deletedxyz Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 I want a first person shooter about war in the Middle East, Korea or Vietnam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tech Star Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 Vietnam? LAME I'll skip this like I did WaW in favour of IW's next cod game Agreed...all for the part except the next IW game. **** IW and CoD. MW2 is crap and a let down with all those glitches and ****ty SP. Bring on BF3, Medal of Honor, and BF:BC2. I laughed This. Youre missing out then, i thought the same but then borrowed it from a friend, its a pretty decent game especially by Treyarch. Missing out on what? A direct port of the engine and mechanics and feel of CoD:MW? All that is changed was the story, but to a crappy one, and mutli-player (a little)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g~man Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 Agreed...all for the part except the next IW game. **** IW and CoD. MW2 is crap and a let down with all those glitches and ****ty SP. Bring on BF3, Medal of Honor, and BF:BC2. This. Missing out on what? A direct port of the engine and mechanics and feel of CoD:MW? All that is changed was the story, but to a crappy one, and mutli-player (a little)? hey... why dont u try playing the game before u bash it lol reasons i preferred waw over cod4 more balanced guns... mp40 was a little overpowered but got owned at range much better and more maps a lot less noob tubing and greanade spamming people were using a lot more different playstyles because all types of weapons were good and balanced... mosin nagant bolt action 1 shot killers to rapid firing thompsons, all there zombies was cool inclusion of tanks...changed the game up on levels, but i still think they should have included a non tank playlist in core gametype as for the campaigns... i prefer some real life shyt over some fantasy shyt ... when the russians stormed reichstag and mounted the flag, that was history baby. add in co-op campaign n i know which one i definately prefer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 I want a first person shooter about war in the Middle East, Korea or Vietnam. Probably won't see anything about war in the Middle East for a while. Can't see a game glamourising a war that is still going on going down too well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BajiRav Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 I want a first person shooter about war in the Middle East, Korea or Vietnam. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maeby Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 im very much looking forward to this, a well done Vietnam game has never been done. I remember thinking shellshock nam '67 was gonna be awesome, but other then the kickass soundtrack the game was horrendous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draken Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 Vietcong was a pretty decent game, but this one will be awesome, well OK, I enjoy gaming hehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3ntury Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 Hmm seems likes a decent idea. But dont ya think eventually they will run out of ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunknMunky Veteran Posted February 24, 2010 Veteran Share Posted February 24, 2010 :sleep: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motoko. Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 I wish Activision would get their balls together and stop milking every single franchise with its unoriginality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahmz Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 [attachment] FAKE! :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightEco Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 I'm looking forward to the singleplayer experience. MW2's campaign was just too short and too insane, it didn't come close to the greatness that was COD4's campaign. I actually liked the campaign from WAW better than MW2 as well as Veteran was actually a challenge and the main character didn't die like 8 times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tech Star Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 hey... why dont u try playing the game before u bash it lol reasons i preferred waw over cod4 more balanced guns... mp40 was a little overpowered but got owned at range much better and more maps a lot less noob tubing and greanade spamming people were using a lot more different playstyles because all types of weapons were good and balanced... mosin nagant bolt action 1 shot killers to rapid firing thompsons, all there zombies was cool inclusion of tanks...changed the game up on levels, but i still think they should have included a non tank playlist in core gametype as for the campaigns... i prefer some real life shyt over some fantasy shyt ... when the russians stormed reichstag and mounted the flag, that was history baby. add in co-op campaign n i know which one i definately prefer Aw shucks...you loled me. :laugh: I played the game, otherwise I wouldn't be talking trash about it. It is a POS and DM, Sethos, and many others here would agree with me, as they all have said it was crap too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajputwarrior Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 I laughed i probably laughed harder then you... the game was just a crapy COD4 mod that you had to pay 60 bucks for... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g~man Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 Aw shucks...you loled me. :laugh: I played the game, otherwise I wouldn't be talking trash about it. It is a POS and DM, Sethos, and many others here would agree with me, as they all have said it was crap too. i doubt u gave it a chance.. u prob played it for 1 minute and cried about wanting a red dot sight lol or ww2 not being cool in a surfer radical type of way and theres many people like you, hence cod4 selling more than waw but to each his own... i know which game i prefer if i want a better shooting experience and war feel cod in vietnam gonna put mw2 to shame... hearbeat sensor? wtf!!! at least make it a perk or something. camp for killstreaks, dont care who u are or what u claim, everyone does this to some degree, care packages with ac130's how nooby is that? marathon, lightweight, commando supersoldiers theres a lot more stuff i can say about the game, but even with all these flaws, i still enjoy it and infinity ward deserve all their success and recognition no doubt. all treyarch doing is using infinity wards engine and reskinning the game, i know this, but they make damn good games STILL... dont act like they make rubbish games in treyarch we trust... vietnam here we come Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tech Star Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 i doubt u gave it a chance.. u prob played it for 1 minute and cried about wanting a red dot sight lol or ww2 not being cool in a surfer radical type of way and theres many people like you, hence cod4 selling more than waw but to each his own... i know which game i prefer if i want a better shooting experience and war feel cod in vietnam gonna put mw2 to shame... hearbeat sensor? wtf!!! at least make it a perk or something. camp for killstreaks, dont care who u are or what u claim, everyone does this to some degree, care packages with ac130's how nooby is that? marathon, lightweight, commando supersoldiers theres a lot more stuff i can say about the game, but even with all these flaws, i still enjoy it and infinity ward deserve all their success and recognition no doubt. all treyarch doing is using infinity wards engine and reskinning the game, i know this, but they make damn good games STILL... dont act like they make rubbish games in treyarch we trust... vietnam here we come I played the first couple of missions/chapters and I hated it. I actually really liked Call of Duty 1 and Call of Duty 2, so no I don't have WWII games. I also never said MW2 was good, it's a POS. Glitchy and crappy multi-playerand horrible story. CoD:MW1 on the other hand was a REALLY good game, which is still really good to this date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lamp0 Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 CoD:MW1 on the other hand was a REALLY good game, which is still really good to this date. See, I don't get this. Every one loves COD4 as if it's the best thing ever made and then slams MW2 like is the worst thing ever made. I think COD4 is more over rated than MW2 at the moment. No one likes MW2, even the people who still play it. I feel MW2 simply built on the annoyances of COD4, and made them extra annoying. Still, I am interested to see how this looks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tech Star Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 See, I don't get this. Every one loves COD4 as if it's the best thing ever made and then slams MW2 like is the worst thing ever made. I think COD4 is more over rated than MW2 at the moment. No one likes MW2, even the people who still play it. I feel MW2 simply built on the annoyances of COD4, and made them extra annoying. Still, I am interested to see how this looks. lol wat? CoD:MW did not have any of the crappy stuff like Heartbeat sensor, dual Akimbos, crappy perks, etc. It was also not as glitchy and crappy multi-player wise as MW2. COD4 is overrated, but it still is a good game and better than MW2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spookie Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 See, I don't get this. Every one loves COD4 as if it's the best thing ever made and then slams MW2 like is the worst thing ever made. I think COD4 is more over rated than MW2 at the moment. No one likes MW2, even the people who still play it. I feel MW2 simply built on the annoyances of COD4, and made them extra annoying. CoD4 had some decent ideas on where shooters should go in the future expanding on already established ideas (ranks & unlocks) and introducing things like perks. Adding another level of customization. MW2 they had ran out of ideas and just tried to +1 them selfs, falling flat on their facing in doing so. Treyarch have done nothing but ride the coat tails of someone elses success. If they were to release it as: "GENERIC WW2 SHOOTER IV - UBER NAZI KILLIN BROMANCE" no one would have paid any attention to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g~man Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 I played the first couple of missions/chapters and I hated it. I actually really liked Call of Duty 1 and Call of Duty 2, so no I don't have WWII games. I also never said MW2 was good, it's a POS. Glitchy and crappy multi-playerand horrible story. CoD:MW1 on the other hand was a REALLY good game, which is still really good to this date. im not really talking about the campaign... more so the online component waw was just a more balanced and interesting game to me compared to cod4 and i think infinity did a good job in balancing out cod6 considering all the guns, perks and gun attachments. after the last patch the only gun i would say is a little unfair is the ump. heartbeat sensor should have never been in the game and the commando lunge should not have the range it does. they are my main complaints CoD4 had some decent ideas on where shooters should go in the future expanding on already established ideas (ranks & unlocks) and introducing things like perks. Adding another level of customization. MW2 they had ran out of ideas and just tried to +1 them selfs, falling flat on their facing in doing so. Treyarch have done nothing but ride the coat tails of someone elses success. If they were to release it as: "GENERIC WW2 SHOOTER IV - UBER NAZI KILLIN BROMANCE" no one would have paid any attention to it. cod 4 and infinity ward deserves all the respect... but lets not act like mario 1 was the best mario platformer out of the bunch. treyarch ju+st copy and paste... yes u could argue that, but they do it soooooo good (and add a few extra gems in there) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sethos Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 Makes me cringe every time someone defends World at War, that game was so abysmal. The maps were so poorly structured and most of them were so drab and bland, you were hit with a minor depression every time you played the game. The sounds were awful, the Call of Duty 4 sounds had some of the most bland sounds I heard in a long time, so tinny and boring yet Treyarch manages to outshine them in that department. The net-code in itself couldn't handle all those single-shot and bolt action rifles and it ruined the experience, shoot someone at 5 meters or 500 meters and the bullet travel time was exact the same, that golden 1 second ... So retarded. The ONLY decent thing about World at War was that zombie crap and even that lost its edge 2 hours into it. So they copied a game, made it a lot more bland in a different era and released it - Yay (N) And Treyarch still makes some of the worst Single-player campaigns around, again, words like drab, boring and bland comes to mind and they have never been able to get it right, the Call of Duty 3 campaign was exactly the same. Call of Duty 4 was great for its time, a great shooter with some new aspects. World at War just rode the recipe and did so with no class at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunknMunky Veteran Posted February 26, 2010 Veteran Share Posted February 26, 2010 Treyarch have done nothing but ride the coat tails of someone elses success. If they were to release it as: "GENERIC WW2 SHOOTER IV - UBER NAZI KILLIN BROMANCE" no one would have paid any attention to it. It warms my heart when I see the overall opinion has now grasped this, seeing as I was one of the few people around here 3 years ago trying to tell people the very same thing :p What I didn't see happening was the complete mess IW would turn MW into... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g~man Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 Makes me cringe every time someone defends World at War, that game was so abysmal. The maps were so poorly structured and most of them were so drab and bland, you were hit with a minor depression every time you played the game. The sounds were awful, the Call of Duty 4 sounds had some of the most bland sounds I heard in a long time, so tinny and boring yet Treyarch manages to outshine them in that department. The net-code in itself couldn't handle all those single-shot and bolt action rifles and it ruined the experience, shoot someone at 5 meters or 500 meters and the bullet travel time was exact the same, that golden 1 second ... So retarded. The ONLY decent thing about World at War was that zombie crap and even that lost its edge 2 hours into it. So they copied a game, made it a lot more bland in a different era and released it - Yay (N) And Treyarch still makes some of the worst Single-player campaigns around, again, words like drab, boring and bland comes to mind and they have never been able to get it right, the Call of Duty 3 campaign was exactly the same. Call of Duty 4 was great for its time, a great shooter with some new aspects. World at War just rode the recipe and did so with no class at all. wow... your main coomplaint is ithat its too bland? did someone ever tell u that this game was set in ww2? were u expecting a levl like terminal in this game? i was a fan of that whole merky gritty look anyway, gave a nice war feeling, pitched together with the gore and decapitations when the best fps ever drops (cod vietnam)... are you gonna complain that it looks too green? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spookie Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 I've been saying it since I played W@W. It was poo! :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sethos Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 wow... your main coomplaint is ithat its too bland? did someone ever tell u that this game was set in ww2? were u expecting a levl like terminal in this game? i was a fan of that whole merky gritty look anyway, gave a nice war feeling, pitched together with the gore and decapitations when the best fps ever drops (cod vietnam)... are you gonna complain that it looks too green? Have you tried writing some proper posts instead of sounding like a 12 year old on crack constantly. I played a heap of World War II games and it's my favorite era yet Treyarch managed to butcher it, completely. And don't make it sound like I'm some MW2 fan because I hated that game :rolleyes: And you totally didn't understand the argument, it's the LAYOUT of maps, it's the use of EFFECTS, it's the TEXTURES, it's the DESIGN that looks terrible. It has nothing to do with the era itself, it's just developers who lack passion because World War II offers a lot of awesome scenarios and possibilities, even the pacific theater offered some staggering battles and some amazing possibilities yet Treyarch failed to capture any of it and made a crappy game overall. The only place I remember as being good was the beach landing mission. Treyarch are a bunch of budget developers who were amazingly drafted to do these Call of Duty spin-offs and they suck at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts