SaltLife Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 To bad they couldn't have had them identical - in terms of character placement - but in regards to the 'blurry', looks to me as it's developers doing the same old PS tricks to alleviate issues with the jaggies. I remember they used to do crazy tactics to get the 'jaggies' to work in their favor on PS2. That will always be Xbox(360) advantage over PS#, it has superior AA. Something I never paid attention to until I purchased my first Xbox. I do not own a 360, only a PS3 And on a side note, why does it look like one image is set to the color profile 'warm' (xbox) while the other is set to 'cool' (ps3) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massiveterra Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Not one legit link in this thread? Kind of disappointing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedon Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 I wouldn't bother with the ps3 version if you have both consoles. So far not so good. Lens of truth ftw soon I hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massiveterra Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 I wouldn't bother with the ps3 version if you have both consoles. So far not so good. Lens of truth ftw soon I hope. Well it's my rule to get 360 versions for multiplat multiplayer anyways but I just smell some major BS in this thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minifig Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 I wouldn't bother with the ps3 version if you have both consoles. So far not so good. Lens of truth ftw soon I hope. You're also a known 360 fanboy.. (no offense Brian! and I don't mean to get this tagged for flaming.. honestly.).. of which I respect your opinion, but.. as it is if I'm going to pick this up (eventually) I might have to pick it up for the PS3 .. The free online -really- makes a difference for someone on a budget. Pablo2008jedi 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
what Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Yes. And from that stand point, I can say I quite like the PS3 version.. Night isn't supposed to have a yellow tint to it. The blue of the PS3 version actually looks decent. They're probably taken at different times. I don't think you can say either looks worse than the other though. They're different, but they both look good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spookie Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Not one legit link in this thread? Kind of disappointing Those sites haven't received their copy for analysis yet. Can't imagine why. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djnv2010 Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 from those 2 shots, all i see is xbox 360 appears greenish and Ps3 is blueish... :x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soniqstylz Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Those sites haven't received their copy for analysis yet. Can't imagine why. :p IGN PS3 review - 9.7, same as 360, no mention of major visual differences. And that's even with an article stating they got the 360 version first, would put up a PS3 review when they got a chance to play it. http://ie.ps3.ign.com/articles/109/1090380p1.html - Review http://ie.ps3.ign.com/articles/109/1090130p1.html - "Where's the PS3 RDR review?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spookie Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 IGN PS3 review - 9.7, same as 360, no mention of major visual differences. IGN is full of ****, much like any of Murdoch's companies, they are the gaming equivalent of Fox News. At least they are consistently full of it though! :p Minifig and Elliott 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massiveterra Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Spookie, #1 hater Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo2008jedi Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 tbh unless a reputable source does a side by side comparison, using the same equipment (i.e. cables and TV) taken at the same reference point at the same "time of day" in game, then I will care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minifig Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Spookie, #1 hater Spookster speaks the absolute 100% truth though, IGN has been known to be paid off for their reviews and has been called out on it before. Spookie and Elliott 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedon Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Lol at calling me an Xbox fanboy. First time I have been called that in the 7 years I have been here. Couldn't be further from the truth. In fact I can't stand ms (nor Sony). However, I am a fanboy of Chevrolet. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spookie Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Spookie, #1 hater Keepin' it real bro. Spookster speaks the absolute 100% truth though, IGN has been known to be paid off for their reviews and has been called out on it before. *high five for following the news as well* :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corris Veteran Posted May 18, 2010 Veteran Share Posted May 18, 2010 Spookster speaks the absolute 100% truth though, IGN has been known to be paid off for their reviews and has been called out on it before. Source? I'm not questioning you, I would just like to read about it and Google didn't turn up anything obvious besides some PS3 fanboys moaning about some adverts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soniqstylz Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=246930 Red Dead Redemption review roundup - PS3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fourjays Veteran Posted May 18, 2010 Veteran Share Posted May 18, 2010 I find all these console graphics comparisons pretty pointless for anything but the ridiculous "my console is better than yours" wars that obsess people so much. You buy it on whichever console you have (and if you own both, usually buy it for a feature-based reason such as Xbox Live) and then never see the other version. I remember frequently reading that the PS3 version of GTA IV wasn't as good graphically as the Xbox 360. I even found some screens (that are fairly similar to these here in the differences) and was a bit worried. But I worried about nothing as it looks great! It's not that there aren't differences, just that once you play a game it is usually of no real consequence what graphical differences there are. Roll on Friday! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawkMan Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 tbh unless a reputable source does a side by side comparison, using the same equipment (i.e. cables and TV) taken at the same reference point at the same "time of day" in game, then I will care. So you think at a slightly earlier time of day the PS3 version will magically have less jaggies ? and magically then not run on a sub HD resolution as has been confirmed it does ? :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motoko. Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 IGN is full of ****, much like any of Murdoch's companies, they are the gaming equivalent of Fox News. At least they are consistently full of it though! :p I don't see how they're full of **** tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massiveterra Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 So you think at a slightly earlier time of day the PS3 version will magically have less jaggies ? and magically then not run on a sub HD resolution as has been confirmed it does ? :p but the problem is that it has not been confirmed (plus he means night time in-game) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyLarry Veteran Posted May 18, 2010 Veteran Share Posted May 18, 2010 You're also a known 360 fanboy.. (no offense Brian! and I don't mean to get this tagged for flaming.. honestly.).. of which I respect your opinion, but.. as it is if I'm going to pick this up (eventually) I might have to pick it up for the PS3 .. The free online -really- makes a difference for someone on a budget. Not that I disagree on your observation, but I do not see nor can I think of a single scenario where one can be called a fanboy and that is a positive thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawkMan Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 but the problem is that it has not been confirmed (plus he means night time in-game) I know he meant nightime in the game. and while I don't think the PS3 version looks horribly much worse, it is obviously running at a lower res than the 360 one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo2008jedi Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 So you think at a slightly earlier time of day the PS3 version will magically have less jaggies ? and magically then not run on a sub HD resolution as has been confirmed it does ? :p Actually I care about gameplay 1st, story 2nd and graphics 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minifig Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Source? I'm not questioning you, I would just like to read about it and Google didn't turn up anything obvious besides some PS3 fanboys moaning about some adverts. http://www.gamespy.com/articles/108/1082347p1.html http://www.joystiq.com/2008/05/02/ign-responds-to-concerns-over-exclusive-gta-iv-review/ You seriously bet they weren't paid to write a favorable review of this? http://ps3.ign.com/articles/105/1056419p1.html : quote: Either that or we're all getting bribed to give games slightly higher scores. http://horizonshadow.org/ign-you-redefine-biased/ OR.. the biggest incriminating link I have for you to read.. http://www.vgmwatch.com/?p=1111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts