Recommended Posts

It's not about me not liking the members in question. It's more about calling out the main trolls because their behaviour disgusts me.

Just my 0.02 ?.

It is subjective at the end of the day. Some might say what you just did is pretty horrible behaviour.

I mean if I went and made a list of all the people I hate..

Let me see..

1. Rap... err nevermind. :rofl:

Just wondering out loud here, but how do other forums implement a rep system and avoid the problems we've seen here?

Maybe those forums have different ideas than us.

Thank you! (see, looks much better when it's written down, not clicked)

But please don't forget you also promised me a white / silver / light-gray forum skin few weeks ago. ;)

The dev responsible for that is slacking unavailable at the moment.

It is subjective at the end of the day. Some might say what you just did is pretty horrible behaviour.

I mean if I went and made a list of all the people I hate..

Let me see..

1. Rap... err nevermind. :rofl:

I edited/deleted several posts while writing them because they were much harsher then what I ended up posting today. In the end I scrapped them because it's not worth it being warned because certain members have to be jerks.

So in the political section and the news section these things are not going to be implemented.

As I said, what I listed only covers a small number of the ideas we're throwing around. Of the ones I listed, maintaining a 0 warning level applies across all forums :p

We are currently looking at designing a new system, where reputation points would mainly be handed out to members automatically for certain things. A few ideas off the top of my head, that may or may not be included in the system: maintaining a 0 warn level whilst being active on the board, providing the 'solution' to a 'problem' posted by a member (akin to Experts Exchange) and so on.
Doesn't sound perfect, but it is a step in the right direction.

Do we all start fresh with the warning level?

Actually not a bad idea: General amnesty while enforcing stricter moderation guidelines. The troublemakers will be back on their normal warning level in no time.

We are currently looking at designing a new system, where reputation points would mainly be handed out to members automatically for certain things. A few ideas off the top of my head, that may or may not be included in the system: maintaining a 0 warn level whilst being active on the board, providing the 'solution' to a 'problem' posted by a member (akin to Experts Exchange) and so on. We have many more ideas, but I don't want to list a whole load of things that may not end up included in the final product.

Sounds good to me. I'm sure that whatever you guys implement will be leaps and bounds better than the old rep system. I've seen reputation/karma systems like the old one used on many different forums, and to this day, I've never seen one of them implemented adequately when the users are given complete control. In about 10% of instances the system is used for its intended purpose (rewarding positive contributions to the community), and in the other 90% of instances, it's used for people to prop up opinions that they happen to agree with.

So all the people with warning level's before this system came in place wont be able to get rep points.. That sucks.

You mean that all the people who have caused trouble in the the past will have to wait to get rep points.

Remember, warning levels go down automatically for non-rulebreaking behavior.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.