Every black hole may hold a hidden universe


Recommended Posts

Radial motion into an Einstein?Rosen bridge

Nikodem J. Popławskia,

a Department of Physics, Indiana University, Swain Hall West, 727 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA

Received 12 May 2009; revised 8 March 2010; accepted 9 March 2010. Editor: S. Dodelson. Available online 11 March 2010.

Abstract

We consider the radial geodesic motion of a massive particle into a black hole in isotropic coordinates, which represents the exterior region of an Einstein?Rosen bridge (wormhole). The particle enters the interior region, which is regular and physically equivalent to the asymptotically flat exterior of a white hole, and the particle's proper time extends to infinity. Since the radial motion into a wormhole after passing the event horizon is physically different from the motion into a Schwarzschild black hole, Einstein?Rosen and Schwarzschild black holes are different, physical realizations of general relativity. Yet for distant observers, both solutions are indistinguishable. We show that timelike geodesics in the field of a wormhole are complete because the expansion scalar in the Raychaudhuri equation has a discontinuity at the horizon, and because the Einstein?Rosen bridge is represented by the Kruskal diagram with Rindler's elliptic identification of the two antipodal future event horizons. These results suggest that observed astrophysical black holes may be Einstein?Rosen bridges, each with a new universe inside that formed simultaneously with the black hole. Accordingly, our own Universe may be the interior of a black hole existing inside another universe.

<snip>

Both black hole solutions are mathematically legitimate, and only experiment or observation can reveal the nature of the infalling radial motion of a particle into a physical black hole. Since the two solutions are indistinguishable for distant observers, which can see only the exterior sheet, the nature of the interior of a physical black hole cannot be satisfactorily determined, unless an observer enters or resides in the interior region. This condition would be satisfied if our Universe were the interior of a black hole existing in a bigger universe [21]. Because Einstein's general theory of relativity does not choose a time orientation, if a black hole can form from the gravitational collapse of matter through an event horizon in the future then the reverse process also possible. Such a process would describe an exploding white hole: matter emerging from an event horizon in the past, like the expanding Universe. Scenarios in which the Universe was born from the interior of an Einstein?Rosen black hole may avoid many of the problems of the standard Big-Bang cosmology and the black hole information-loss problem [22]. These scenarios, involving gravitational collapse of a sphere of dust in isotropic coordinates, and generalization of the results of the present Letter to Schwarzschild?de Sitter and Kerr black holes will be the subjects of further study.

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing is getting clearer and clearer: Our present day common concept of the universe is inadequate and flawed. To my mind there's just a mess of energy out there and dependent on the mesh you look through all explanations within that mesh are correct.

Change the mesh and that's equally correct.

I always picture it as a badly tuned TV. The snow on the screen. If you take a piece of cardboard and punch holes in it and put in front of the screen you get a consistent view, the same holes will light up every once in a while. The cardboard is your perspective of the universe.?

Change the cardboard and you get a different consistent view, but with the same random data behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm how interesting.

What I can infer from the reading, is that a possible black hole from a different universe created a white hole in this universe, and thus created our known universe through the explosion of matter being thrown out into this visible universe.

Truly interesting theory, hence that would created a whole new way to question the whole chicken or the egg theory. e.g. as Black hole(Chicken) White hole (Egg).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The chicken and egg question to me is very simple:

The only place were anything can just spontaneously happen is a place where there's nothing to prevent it from happening. Avoiding the meatphysical the only place would be: nothing.

If there's nothing, there's also nothing to prevent a big bang developing.

No chicken, no physical laws stating there should be a chicken, so a spontaneous egg materializing out of: nothing

Something similar happens on a quantum level, split particles having momentarily a greater combined energy then it's original particle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are still touching the waters of space exploration. I love this kind of stuff. Just a pity that in our lifetime we will not be able to visit other planets like we are visiting other countries today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

One thing is getting clearer and clearer: Our present day common concept of the universe is inadequate and flawed.

I've known scientists idea of what is real and true is flawed since I was able to think for myself. Scientists are basically educated idiots, making guesses. Half of what we know today will be laughed at in 100 years, just as that is the same today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's interesting about this theory is that if the stuff of our

universe came from another universe... then the other universe

is not only similar to ours, but just like it. Think of moving furniture

from one room to another room to another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's interesting about this theory is that if the stuff of our

universe came from another universe... then the other universe

is not only similar to ours, but just like it. Think of moving furniture

from one room to another room to another.

not really, even a slight variation in physical properties (like the spin of an electron) could dramaticlly change the outcome. molecules that cant be formed or be stable in another universe will be viable and vice versa. kinda like how mixing paints of rgb will give totally different colors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sounds very interesting I love this stuff too. As shame I will never be able to explore space, maybe my grandchildren can^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if all blackholes lead to our universe?

All roads lead to Amber.

not really, even a slight variation in physical properties (like the spin of an electron) could dramaticlly change the outcome. molecules that cant be formed or be stable in another universe will be viable and vice versa. kinda like how mixing paints of rgb will give totally different colors.

That's assuming some kind of change is forced during the passing through.

Without assuming any such change, the theory stands.

Now, if such a molecular change is happening as matter passes through a

black hole, there is absolute nothing we can derive about the other universe.

We can't send a camera through because it would be changed as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been wondering about that since I was a kid. We can't be alone in the universe and there's just too much weird **** going on to have an explanation for everything.

Hell, I still wonder what the Bermuda Triangle really is. I'm sure there's some kind of scientific explanation (e.g. tectonic plates, magnetic field, etc), but you never know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell, I still wonder what the Bermuda Triangle really is. I'm sure there's some kind of scientific explanation (e.g. tectonic plates, magnetic field, etc), but you never know...

Well if were talking about such a things, then... a microscopic wormhole to the parallel universe? AFAIR, all people who get close to the Triangle location dissapeard without any signs. Of course its not an scientific explanation (yet ;p).

I like that kind of stuff. Oh, and by the way:

post-191715-12819102813135.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if were talking about such a things, then... a microscopic wormhole to the parallel universe? AFAIR, all people who get close to the Triangle location dissapeard without any signs. Of course its not an scientific explanation (yet ;p).

To be fair, thousands of ships/planes pass through the Bermuda Triangle everyday without a single issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, thousands of ships/planes pass through the Bermuda Triangle everyday without a single issue.

I think it's just an area of the earth that has a lot of trouble with, currents, hurricanes and perhaps very rarely some methane issues. Also the currents might cause a lot of Rogue waves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the coolest thing I have hared in a long time ... mind you the 3D news about pron was pretty cool ...

Still, I hope that in my lifetime humanity would at lest try to send/ colonize mars, at the same time as maybe start exploring space more with funds from non waged wars ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's just an area of the earth that has a lot of trouble with, currents, hurricanes and perhaps very rarely some methane issues. Also the currents might cause a lot of Rogue waves.

To most people's surprise there are 2 or 3 "triangles" around the planet that have the same volatile strange weather. Japan's Dragon Triangle is one and I know there is at least another just cant remember the name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still, I hope that in my lifetime humanity would at lest try to send/ colonize mars, at the same time as maybe start exploring space more with funds from non waged wars ...

That would be a dream of mine^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh.

To me, colonizing Mars is stupid. There's nothing there!

Sure, we could send a ship to maybe collect materials... but trying to

live there? Why??? That's just asking for trouble. It took us weeks to

get relief to Katrina folks... imagine if they had a problem on Mars.

We need to find an earth-like planet where folks could sustain themselves,

and THEN worry about colonizing. The Space Station is a good start for

viewing space outside the interference of our atmosphere because it's still

relatively close. But as we're noticing an issue now with their cooling element...

imagine if that was a whole society up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That means there are a lot of universes out there.

Yup that's pretty much what String Theory and M-Theory puts forward! M-theory is an extension of string theory in which 11 dimensions are identified. Because the dimensionality exceeds the dimensionality of superstring theories in 10 dimensions, it is believed that the 11-dimensional theory unites all five string theories (and supersedes them).

I recently watched an episode of "Through The Wormhole" What Happened Before The Beginning!

Pretty amazing stuff!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh.

To me, colonizing Mars is stupid. There's nothing there!

Sure, we could send a ship to maybe collect materials... but trying to

live there? Why??? That's just asking for trouble. It took us weeks to

get relief to Katrina folks... imagine if they had a problem on Mars.

We need to find an earth-like planet where folks could sustain themselves,

and THEN worry about colonizing. The Space Station is a good start for

viewing space outside the interference of our atmosphere because it's still

relatively close. But as we're noticing an issue now with their cooling element...

imagine if that was a whole society up there.

So you expect the human species to look for other Earth-like planets when we don't even know how to colonize the planet next to us? Even if Mars has nothing, knowledge gained if we aim to colonize it will help us (probably make even easier) in the colonization of another Earth-like planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you expect the human species to look for other Earth-like planets when we don't even know how to colonize the planet next to us? Even if Mars has nothing, knowledge gained if we aim to colonize it will help us (probably make even easier) in the colonization of another Earth-like planet.

No.

The best way to test colonizing another earth-like planet, by definition, is by practicing on earth.

Anyhow, I'm just saying that to think we can, or even should, try to build a long-term habitat on a planet with

absolutely nothing to offer is a waste of time. Our current technology has us at a point where it's still

wildly expensive just to get TO space. Now we're talking about getting a single ship to a far-off planet and

then drop people off there? Sorry, but they're screwed. Mars cannot sustain human life on its own, and to think

for a second that we have the means to drop people off there and be able to properly support them for any

length of time is absurd.

I would love to think we'll be colonizing planets within my lifetime, but it's not going to happen.

True colonization will require finding a planet capable of sustaining human life on its own. That is to say,

if no other supply ships from earth ever showed up the people would still be able to sustain themselves.

Also, it REALLY needs to happen outside our solar system. We have enough problems with North Korea (for

example) wanting to take over the world. If we tried to inhabit another nearby planet, we'd quickly have

planetary war. Humans are just stupid like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.