Alex Collier


Recommended Posts

The problem with your statement here is that you compared Charles Manson to an innocent. Charles Manson is a murderer.

So, Manson killed those people? I thought he convinced a group of people to go and kill them? Who's the murderer?

Manson was insane, brainwashed people to believe things, that turned out to be a bad idea. Collier seems insane, seemed to brainwash you that UFO's exist, hopefully this doesn't turn out to be a bad idea.

Let's see how insane I am.

1. I do not drink or do drugs.

2. I do not eat meat.

3. I do not watch television.

4. I read plenty of books.

5. I get plenty of exercise

6. I have never even THOUGHT about harming anything, and IN FACT I get rid of bugs in my house using a glass jar and release them.

7. I have never experienced sex yet.

If you still think I'm insane, you my friend are insane.

These reasons you have listed shows you haven't experienced life.

1. Drinking isn't a bad thing, and to be experimental with drugs isn't bad either, just not recommended. Not saying I do drugs, because I've only tried weed once and hated it.

2. Why not? God put cows on this planet to be ate. But, I'm sure if you believe in UFO's you don't believe in God.

3. You don't watch television on a TV, or at all (Hulu, Boxee, or channel websites)?

4. That's cool. I'm sure the smart insane people like Ted Bundy read a lot of books.

5. I'm sure there are insane people out there like in American Psycho, staying extremely fit.

6. You're telling me you never got into a fight? Or been picked on or anything that made you want to hit someone to stand up for yourself? But still that doesn't prove anything.

7. That definitely has nothing to do with being insane or sane. But, you should experience it sometime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They don't want your useless money.

What does this have to do with the thread?

If they dont charge money (Alex Collier), how in any way does that mean it should be considered more truthful?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Manson killed those people? I thought he convinced a group of people to go and kill them? Who's the murderer?

Manson was insane, brainwashed people to believe things, that turned out to be a bad idea. Collier seems insane, seemed to brainwash you that UFO's exist, hopefully this doesn't turn out to be a bad idea.

Logic, it doesnt belong in threads like this. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont think so, Im sure he will find my money pretty useful to buy alcohol. I wont give him a penny, ever :laugh:

You won't have to because he won't ask you for a penny at all, and never will.

Pretending that he wants money from you doesn't change the reality.

Alex Collier is a spiritually inclined person, and doesn't drink, smoke or do dumb things like most people.

I don't care if manson killed people or told people to kill people, it's still genuine insanity.

There's no reason people should believe that UFO's or E.Ts do not exist, and I don't see how it could be a bad idea at all. it's absolutely harmless. In fact It would probably be more acceptable to call someone crazy who does not believe that these things exist, because that person is pretty much living in denial.

As for experiencing life, I have certain beliefs, just like you do. You need to respect that.

If I do not want to experience sex without love (it is an addiction for most people, look at porn), drugs, violence or do all the other things that are pushing this planet into the **** hole, then so be it. An example of me experiencing life, is going on a walk in nature.

God did not put cows on this planet to be eaten, and we were not put on this planet to experience violence or all these other negative things. To my research we were vegetarians in the FIRST PLACE. Our intestines are so long that by time the meat gets through our systems, it's already purified.

Humans on this planet have become idiots and pretty much almost always have been, and assume the universe revolves around them, when in reality it's just a sad, sad misconception.

We also aren't fast enough to catch animals or anything like most carnivores, we don't have the nails or carnivore teeth to rip animals apart. It's just not our nature.

To my belief our sole purpose on this planet is purely to express consciousness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to debate the original point of this thread; my own views have already been expressed by others, but this

We also aren't fast enough to catch animals or anything like most carnivores, we don't have the nails or carnivore teeth to rip animals apart. It's just not our nature.

simply isn't true. As a species we are quite able to catch and eat animals. Always have been. I can quite easily kill an animal with my bare hands, and my incisor teeth are there to help me rip flesh apart before chewing.

Your lifestyle choice is your choice, and I respect that, but that doesn't make everyone else wrong. That's their choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to debate the original point of this thread; my own views have already been expressed by others, but this

simply isn't true. As a species we are quite able to catch and eat animals. Always have been. I can quite easily kill an animal with my bare hands, and my incisor teeth are there to help me rip flesh apart before chewing.

Your lifestyle choice is your choice, and I respect that, but that doesn't make everyone else wrong. That's their choice.

I don't care if people eat meat, and I respect their choice and give them their space.

We can catch pigs and cows and such because they are slow and easily controllable for the commercial industry, but you can't go out and catch anything more than that like a deer or a bear without using anything intelligent such as equipment like a rifle or a knife etc. Most of us wouldn't dare of eating meat raw either, we always cook it in some fashion. So even if you did have claws and whatnot to rip flesh apart, it wouldn't go down very well.

Meat-eaters: have claws

Herbivores: no claws

Humans: no claws

Meat-eaters: have no skin pores and perspire through the tongue

Herbivores: perspire through skin pores

Humans: perspire through skin pores

Meat-eaters: have sharp front teeth for tearing, with no flat molar teeth for grinding

Herbivores: no sharp front teeth, but flat rear molars for grinding

Humans: no sharp front teeth, but flat rear molars for grinding

Meat-eaters: have intestinal tract that is only 3 times their body length so that rapidly decaying meat can pass through quickly

Herbivores: have intestinal tract 10-12 times their body length.

Humans: have intestinal tract 10-12 times their body length.

Meat-eaters: have strong hydrochloric acid in stomach to digest meat

Herbivores: have stomach acid that is 20 times weaker than that of a meat-eater

Humans: have stomach acid that is 20 times weaker than that of a meat-eater

Meat-eaters: salivary glands in mouth not needed to pre-digest grains and fruits.

Herbivores: well-developed salivary glands which are necessary to pre-digest grains and fruits

Humans: well-developed salivary glands, which are necessary to pre-digest, grains and fruits

Meat-eaters: have acid saliva with no enzyme ptyalin to pre-digest grains

Herbivores: have alkaline saliva with ptyalin to pre-digest grains

Humans: have alkaline saliva with ptyalin to pre-digest grains

A popular statement that meat eaters say is; ?In the wild, animals kill other animals for food. It?s nature.? First of all, we are not in the wild. Secondly, we can easily live without eating meat and killing, not to mention we?d be healthier. Meat and seafood putrefies within 4 hours after consumption and the remnants cling to the walls of the stomach and intestines for 3-4 days or longer than if a person is constipated. Furthermore, the reaction of saliva in humans is more alkaline, whereas in the case of flesh-eating or preying animals, it is clearly acidic. The alkaline saliva does not act properly on meat.

The only reason we eat meat, is because we have been influenced and conditioned to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also evidence to suggest that the reason we as a species evolved more quickly compared to our close cousins is because we started to intake a more protein-rich meat-based diet. This made us stronger, and helped our brain to develop. Whether this was "as nature intended" is irrelevant; we did and do eat meat, and here we are now. Vegetarianism is a relatively recent lifestyle choice.

But where is this thread going now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also evidence to suggest that the reason we as a species evolved more quickly compared to our close cousins is because we started to intake a more protein-rich meat-based diet. This made us stronger, and helped our brain to develop. Whether this was "as nature intended" is irrelevant; we did and do eat meat, and here we are now. Vegetarianism is a relatively recent lifestyle choice.

But where is this thread going now?

You can have a very high-protein diet without meat. Vegetarianism has always been around, and is not a recent phenomenon.

In fact, the meat eating would be the more recent phenomenon.

Our omnivorism means we're capable of eating meat (cooked) (useful from a survival standpoint if that's all that's available), but our bodies aren't geared for it to be a normal, significant part of our diets.

We sleep about the same amount of time as other herbivores, and less than carnivores and true omnivores.

The most common cause of choking deaths is eating meat. Real carnivores and omnivores don't have that problem.

I would also like to see this evidence of yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/99legacy/6-14-1999a.html

Took only a few seconds with Google. I'm sure there is more if I cared to look further into it.

"Milton said that her theories do not reflect on today's vegetarian diets, which can be completely adequate, given modern knowledge of nutrition."

They only ate meat because they had to for survival. The nutritional value of meat can be met by vegetarianism today, without the negative health effects of the meat and added hormones and "meat glue" etc now used by commercial meat vendors.

"Since plant foods available in the dry and deforested early human environment had become less nutritious, meat was critical for weaned infants, said Milton. She explained that small infants could not have processed enough bulky plant material to get both nutrients for growth and energy for brain development."

In todays society meat eating isn't needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In todays society meat eating isn't needed.

I don't dispute that. As I said, it's a lifestyle choice. You asked for evidence of my claims and I presented some. I have no intention of arguing about the pros and cons of vegetarianism, so I'm not sure where you're going with this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You won't have to because he won't ask you for a penny at all, and never will.

Pretending that he wants money from you doesn't change the reality.

Alex Collier is a spiritually inclined person, and doesn't drink, smoke or do dumb things like most people.

Alex Collier does not exist.

Alex Collier is a character portrayed by Ralph Amagran. You believe in his lies, by calling him Alex Collier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alex Collier does not exist.

Alex Collier is a character portrayed by Ralph Amagran. You believe in his lies, by calling him Alex Collier.

I hope you do know that he gave himself that name to hide his identity so naysayers wouldn't try to hunt him down.

Your wrong, I respect his choice that he wants his real name to be of non-importance so he can still live a daily life without extreme amounts of interference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You won't have to because he won't ask you for a penny at all, and never will.

Pretending that he wants money from you doesn't change the reality.

Alex Collier is a spiritually inclined person, and doesn't drink, smoke or do dumb things like most people.

And none of that means anything to how sane someone may or may not be. So your point is moot.

There's no reason people should believe that UFO's or E.Ts do not exist, and I don't see how it could be a bad idea at all. it's absolutely harmless. In fact It would probably be more acceptable to call someone crazy who does not believe that these things exist, because that person is pretty much living in denial.

My guess is your young based on some of the responses you have made and continue to make. With that said, there is absolutely ZERO reason to believe UFO's and ET are in any way one in the same. UFO's do not equate ET. As for the comment that its harmless to believe in that stuff, you clearly havent done all your research. Let me give you a hand. "Heaven's Gate" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven%27s_Gate_%28religious_group%29

Educate yourself before continuing retarded comments.

God did not put cows on this planet to be eaten, and we were not put on this planet to experience violence or all these other negative things. To my research we were vegetarians in the FIRST PLACE. Our intestines are so long that by time the meat gets through our systems, it's already purified.

We also aren't fast enough to catch animals or anything like most carnivores, we don't have the nails or carnivore teeth to rip animals apart. It's just not our nature.

The parts in bold are the important parts. You clearly have done little to no research on this subject. There is no proof that cows and other animals are not part of the natural design to be part of the food consumption for man. Many animals are natural carnivores. Man is unique in that our digestive track is more then capable to make use of both plant and animal, omnivores. Lack of claws or pointed teeth is not an indicator that we shouldnt eat meet. Man has made use of our brain to be able to hunt with other means as well, as proven in the video below. So please stop make ignorant statements to which you have little knowledge about.

I hope you do know that he gave himself that name to hide his identity so naysayers wouldn't try to hunt him down.

Your wrong, I respect his choice that he wants his real name to be of non-importance so he can still live a daily life without extreme amounts of interference.

Do you have any idea how retarded that sounds? If people know what his other name is, how in any way does that keep people from "hunting him down"? Talk about retarded comments. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.