
While AT&T is well behind both Verizon and T-Mobile in launching its faster LTE based wireless network, the company is finally revealing the first US cities that will benefit from the faster data speeds when the service does go live later this year. In a new press release today, AT&T revealed that Dallas, Houston, Chicago, Atlanta and San Antonio will be the debut locations for the LTE service when it goes live sometime this summer. Furthermore, AT&T says that it will add 10 more unnamed locations in the US in the second half of 2011 to have LTE service. The company claims by the end of the year, the LTE network will cover 70 million people in the US.
In a recent article at GigaOM, AT&T showed off the LTE service's speed, claiming that it will have download speeds of 28.87 Mbps and upload speeds of 10.4 Mbps. That, in theory, will be much faster than Verizon's own current LTE network which it says can push down between 5 and 12 Mbps for download speeds and upload speeds of up to 5 Mbps. However, Verizon has also got a several month head start on its own LTE network with a large number of cities already live and many more going live in the near future. T-Mobile, which AT&T is trying to acquire at the moment, has also just activated a new and fast wireless network in over 50 cities this week with speeds that it says will reach 42 Mbps on downloads.

Comments (9)
ReplyThe T-Mobile speed quoted is theoretical maximum of their DC-HSDPA network. The theoretical maximum of LTE on both Verizon and AT&T is significantly higher than 42.2 Mbps. Also, somebody in another thread put a link to a speedtest from a Verizon LTE phone in New York, and was getting about 35 Mbps down and 5 Mbps up (http://www.speedtest.net/android/55318073.png). So Verizon's 5-12 down is obviously an underestimate on their part.
That would be me. And I love the service. Just for laughs and mostly to show it off to people considering a Thunderbolt or a Droid Charge, I ran the test again this morning. http://www.speedtest.net/android/55819476.png
What does it matter, they will then put caps on it and it will have little value...which they will then spin to people "requesting" slower service.
Exactly.
Damnit why not Phoenix or LA?
Probably because AT&T's networks in the East are far better developed and have better coverage than they do in the West.
Probably because AT&T's networks in the East are far better developed and have better coverage than they do in the West.
I agree. I believe Cingular was primarily in the West Coast and AT&T took them over.
"In a new press release today, AT&T revealed that Dallas, Houston, Chicago, Atlanta and San Antonio will be the debut locations for the LTE service when it goes live sometime this summer."
Okay, let's cover that list.
Eastern cities: Atlanta
Mid-East Cities: Chicago
Mid-West Cities: Houston, Dallas
Western Cities: San Antonio
In Conclusion, The east has 1 city on the list. Mid-East, 1. Mid-west, 2, and west 1. If anything, they are favoring Texas. I don't see the East getting much love at all.