Intel chips to shrink to 32-nanometer process

During a keynote at the Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco, Intel announced it will ramp up performance and energy efficiency in its microprocessors by using a 32-nanometer process technology starting in 2009. Intel president and CEO Paul Otellini showed a 300mm wafer built using the 32-nm manufacturing technology which will house more than 1.9 billion transistors and Ottelini touted that its increased performance will enable "true to life entertainment and real-life graphics capabilities." Intel isn't the first to announce 32-nm chip technology: in May, a group of chipmakers (Freescale Semiconductor, Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing, Infineon Technologies, and Samsung Electronics) led by IBM agreed to further collaborate to jointly develop 32-nm semiconductor production technology.

Intel currently uses a 65-nm process to manufacture chips, but the company's future processors built using the 45-nm include its Penryn processor, due in November, and Silverthorne and Nehalem processors, slated to appear early and in the second half of next year, respectively. In the first public demonstration of the Nehalem processor, Otellini said it will deliver better performance per watt and better system performance through its QuickPath Interconnect system architecture, which will include an integrated memory controller and improved communication links between system components. Otellini also announced a Penryn dual-core processor operating at 25 watts that will be available on the upcoming Montevina platform, which will also include WiMax technology. To meet multiple computing needs, Otellini said Intel also plans to introduce 15 new 45-nm processors by the end of the year and 20 in the first quarter of 2008.

News source: InfoWorld

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

VUPlayer 2.49

Next Story

USB 3.0 To Boost Peripherals to Multi-Gigabit Speeds

17 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

Does anyone else see the Irony in intel's statement of "true to life entertainment and real-life graphics capabilities."?
Since when have general CPU's ever outpaced a dedicated graphics card? Even intels fastest Quad Core would get trounced in graphical operations by whatever ATI/Nvidia has out at the moment. And they're still on 90nm.

32nm??? but the blitz extreme says it'll support the 45nm cpus when they come out... things are moving along too quickly.

Well this gives ASUS a chance to make a board like the Blitz extreme and Striker extreme, but better! They'd better put the street lights back in their next board The blitz is ugly. Oh oh and it should come with a cpu water block this time, cuz the blitz only came with water cooling for the chipset bridges. I can't wait!!!!

MioTheGreat said,
Jeez. 32nm. If they get much smaller, they'll be dealing with quantum weirdness in their CMOS circuits....

After Montevina, Intel's next line will be called TARDIS.

Intel is just so far ahead, its amazing. I love my core 2 duo, but I can't imagine what a 32 nm processor would be like. They'll probably overclock like mad.

yeah intel is far ahead now... but from around the time athlons came out (2000-2001ish?) til about mid 2006 AMD was king.

hopefully by the time i build my next pc... amd will be back on top ;)

cause it aint like intel needs the money.

ThaCrip said,
yeah intel is far ahead now... but from around the time athlons came out (2000-2001ish?) til about mid 2006 AMD was king.

hopefully by the time i build my next pc... amd will be back on top ;)

cause it aint like intel needs the money.

I've never understood brand loyalty... go with whatever is the best...