Kaspersky 7.0.1.321

Kaspersky® Anti-Virus(KAV) provides all types of anti-virus protection: antivirus scanners, monitors, behavior blockers and integrity checkers.

Kaspersky® Internet Security(KIS) provides you with the same proven anti-virus protection as Kaspersky Anti-Virus together with additional features including Parental Control, a personal firewall, an anti-spam filter, Privacy Control and more.

Product Highlights:

  • Integrated protection from all Internet threats
  • Integrated antivirus protection: 1) Hourly automated database updates, 2) Preliminary behavior analysis, 3) On-going behavior analysis. New!
  • Real-time scanning for email, Internet traffic and files
  • Personal firewall with an IDS / IPS system. Improved!
  • Protection from leaks of confidential data. New!
  • Parental Control. New!
  • Protection from spam and phishing
  • Automatic database updates
Additional Features:
  • Protection from viruses, Trojans and worms
  • Protection from spyware and adware
  • Protection from all types of keyloggers. Improved!
  • Detection of all types of rootkits. Improved!
  • Protection from viruses when using ICQ and other IM clients
  • Rollback of malicious changes on your PC
  • Self-defense of the antivirus program from being disabled or stopped
  • Tools for creating a Rescue Disk
  • Free technical support
Download Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.1.321: English Version | Mirror (Shareware)
Download Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.1.321: French Version | Mirror (Shareware)
Download Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.1.321: German Version | Mirror (Shareware)
Download Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.1.321: Russian Version | Mirror (Shareware)
View: Version Comparison | Release Notes
Link: Home Page

Download Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0.1.321: English Version | Mirror (Shareware)
Download Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0.1.321: French Version | Mirror (Shareware)
Download Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0.1.321: German Version | Mirror (Shareware)
Download Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0.1.321: Russian Version | Mirror (Shareware)
View: Version Comparison | Release Notes
Link: Home Page

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

BitComet 0.98

Next Story

Counter-Strike and Condition Zero Update Released

64 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

EL1TE.........maybe you need glasses cause more then once you didnt see what I typed. I have never said KIS. It has always been KAV. And I also never said anything about a power pc that was someone else.

Ok once again its not my pc thats slow its the internet. Disabling proactive changes nothing. Disabling web filtering does.

Hmm, are using Internet Security?

Add your browser to the firewall. That it's simply weird, are you sure you don't have another security application running?

Been there done that EL1TE. Its not my pc thats slow its my surfing. Web pages load very slowly and sometime not at all cause KAV filters the pages. If I turn web filtering on low it still is slow. If I turn it off its fast. I went back to NOD32 along with ZAAS for my firewall. I tried for hours last night to make it work. Not worth but I am sure its a good program.

I never said anything about super computer. That was another poster. The first problem is incompatibility. Why uninstall Comodo or Zone Alarm just to install KAV. I have tried several anti viruses. Most of them that are out there and never had to uninstall a firewall. NOD32 is compatible with all my 200 apps.

As i said before the problem is that because you install Kaspersky with Proactive-Defense (protection in real time against changes on the system made by programs), which i don't use, in fact is THAT what makes the computers slow, and if there's no trojans in my computer why should i need it? I don't need it, just try Kaspersky without Proactive-Defence (deactivate or choose custom installation and remove it) and you'll see if it's slow. :P

@Munk

Then what are doing here? Pointless huh?

@Vett

Your web surf what? omg, the i must have a super computer.

Whatever, use what you want if that do what you need, but please, to flame Kaspersky name because Kaspersky it's not crap, but if you go that way then i say crap is NOD because it doesn't have nothing new hen compared to Kaspersky, what it have has been made by Kaspersky long time ago. PERIOD.

Ok well after uninstalling Comodo just to install this I am disappointed and have the same results as I did 6 months ago before I bought NOD32. My web surfing comes to a crawl. Even when I turn KAV down its still slow. Some pages never show up. Back to NOD32 which makes web pages load very quicky and still protects me.

Elite is one very excitable chap when it comes to AV software

I am wise enough to make no comments about ANY views on antivirus software due to fear of decapitation.

Whatever.

"A donkey will be a donkey forever". ;)

Edit: So tell me one thing, what NOD users have to come here say NOD is better or whatever? Do they die if they don't say it?

*Protects self by hiding behind a basket full of fluffy kittens*

Pointless argument IMO a bit like arguing about which is better FF or IE.

Just for the record I currently don't use an AV. They are often rendered useless by the addition of common sence.

I'm sure, the Final version of Kaspersky appear on this link(s):

[url="http://downloads1.kaspersky-labs.com/"]http://downloads1.kaspersky-labs.com/[/url][u]products[/u]/

While Beta versions appear on this one:

[url="http://downloads1.kaspersky-labs.com/"]http://downloads1.kaspersky-labs.com/[/url][u]devbuilds[/u]/

If you look at this link you can see the old latest final version as well the new Final version:

Anyway, i've checked their web site to make sure, here's a link:

http://www.kaspersky.com/productupdates?chapter=186437046

EL1TE said,
I'm sure, the Final version of Kaspersky appear on this link(s):

[url="http://downloads1.kaspersky-labs.com/"]http://downloads1.kaspersky-labs.com/[/url][u]products[/u]/

While Beta versions appear on this one:

[url="http://downloads1.kaspersky-labs.com/"]http://downloads1.kaspersky-labs.com/[/url][u]devbuilds[/u]/

If you look at this link you can see the old latest final version as well the new Final version:

Anyway, i've checked their web site to make sure, here's a link:

http://www.kaspersky.com/productupdates?chapter=186437046

:)

hmm... that's weird, when i go to their website it still shows 7.0.0.125 as the latest version.

I'll download the new one anyways...

Let me break it down for everyone.
Kaspkersky used to be a resource hog. Version 7 is a huge improvement in that area. Kaspersky has the best detection rates.
NOD32 is known for a small footprint. It has worse detection rates than Kaspersky but much better heuristics.

Both are better than the leading security solutions (Norton, Mcafee etc.) In the end, it doesn't matter which you choose because security applications do not protect against ignorance.

Wow, BMW vs Mercedes.

Use what you like, I choose Kav, cuz it worked wonders for me and never failed me over 10 years.

Ok so I gave it a try for the hell of it. KAV would not install on my machine with Comodo firewall and would not install on my other machine running ZA. What kind of anti virus isnt compatible with a firewall. NOD32 installs with any firewall.

EL1TE said,
The problem is not from the firewall but from the user. ;)

I dont think so when KAV says cannot install with Comodo already installed please remove. So thats my fault. NOT.

Vettetech said,

I dont think so when KAV says cannot install with Comodo already installed please remove. So thats my fault. NOT.


Kaspersky installs, it only warns the user that is another application with proactive-defense.

At least the when i've tried KAV 7 and the first RC of COMODO Firewall 3 it installed without any problems.

Anyway, you can choose Custom Installation and un-check the Proactive Defense, if you are not interested in KAV proactive-defense since you use COMODO.

since when neowin becomes a place that nod32 fans vs kav fans.

my personal use its for nod32 because its very lightweight, BUT i think that kav its good if you have a very good PC to handle it.

well, your statement says that kav needs a strong pc, and you dont with nod. your contradicting yourself, your debating too.

I'm happy they are both there, if one company goes out, I have the other one to use.

Memory usage becomes a problem when software makes a machine crawl like McAfee does. What is the point in buying top of the line machine and getting celeron like performace ? That being said within reasonable memory usage detection rate takes priority. Now that reasonable memory parameter depends on the machine specification. What is the point having the best detection rate if you can't use the machine ? So its all a balance. The software that balances out things well wins.

Thank you for the update news. Do we really this debate here? This post is for Kaspersky users to update their software, and not for others to come preach their crap.

Your screen shot proves nothing but memory usage. So I guess KAV is better cause it uses less memory then NOD32. Mmmm let me think about that for a min. An anti virus protects your pc from viruses. An anti virus doesn't care how much memory it uses thats not what it looks at. AV Comparatives and many other sites rate NOD32 # 1 cause of its DETECTION rate not Memory usage.

First i would appreciate that you write properly.

Second, i'm still waiting for proofs, after 20 messages you haven't give ONE.

Third, NOD has better detection rate than Kaspersky? Prove it.

LOLOLOL

You're just a little kid, just look at what you said "NOD is better", but you give no reasons.

I've posted reasons and a screen shot, are you sure that are not you which are crying?

Anyway, who cares about what other users use? Oh i see, you use NOD because some other users use.

Whatever, a donkey will be a donkey forever. PERIOD.

Bye

th3rEsa said,
A bunch of crap > Vista.

th3rEsa said,

Wrong. Completely wrong.

Vettetech said,
I dont call that much. Hell most sytem have atleast a gig of ram. If you dont then I guess that would be a problem. Hell I use ZAAS and that uses as much as 37k and I dont notice any slow downs.

Before was because NOD uses less memory, now that you got owned you have 1GB and that's everything alright.

To you both:

Wow guys, you guys are so smart that you don't even give a reason for what you say, Just LAME, commonly say by noobs (sorry but it's what you guys are).

----

Whatever, the time i've wasted with you both is enough, if want to see the truth good, if not that's not my problem, seriously. PERIOD.

See you...

I dont call that much. Hell most sytem have atleast a gig of ram. If you dont then I guess that would be a problem. Hell I use ZAAS and that uses as much as 37k and I dont notice any slow downs.

LOL

Why? Because NOD sucks when compared tto Kaspersky and the prove is there?

Don't make me laugh, plus, so, TopTenReviews is a "rogue" site one but the site you provided not? :laugh: :laugh:


Oh no no, wait, i use NOD so it's better, but why? Because i use it.

EL1TE said,
LOL

Why? Because NOD sucks when compared tto Kaspersky and the prove is there?

Don't make me laugh, plus, so, TopTenReviews is a "rogue" site one but the site you provided not? :laugh: :laugh:


Oh no no, wait, i use NOD so it's better, but why? Because i use it. :rolleyes:

That site does not do any real testing themselves. They dont do any detection rate scanning and I wouldnt call KAV getting a silver and NOD32 getting a bronze sucking on NOD32's part. They get there info from other sites. They mainly rate on easy of use. NOD32 is more for advanced users and KAV is more for novices.

Vettetech said,
NOD32 is more for advanced users and KAV is more for novices.


This will be nice :P

can you explain me (novice) why?

EL1TE said,


This will be nice :P

can you explain me (novice) why? :rolleyes:

Although I like KAV/KIS better, av-comparatives is one of the best sites to compare AVs. They do their own testing, therefore they dont copy and paste from somewhere else. Thus, they are well respected. plz dont make us look like fools for bashing that site.

yes, NOD is better in false positives, but IMO thats pretty much it. KAV does have better definitions, better speed, doesnt hog system resources, and so on. for god sake, many companies are using KAV engine to power their own AVs. does not that tell u something?

abulfares said,
KAV does have better definitions, better speed, doesnt hog system resources, and so on.

Wrong. Completely wrong.

That reply is LAME.

Let me translate.

What NOD has so specially that makes it better than Kaspersky? I need proofs, but please, not the ones that we can found in their site ( -.- )

Kaspersky was who bring to users the "proactive-defense", which means real-time protection against virus, was the first to bring updates-per-minute (probably you only know about hourly updates, however if you try to run the updater again after 1 minute the update will download the new definitions that the K. Labs updated in their servers)

Oh yes, i've testes both, NOD is good, but not good as Kaspersky, the Anti-Virus does not have anything new or better, the Smart Security firewall IS crap (no advanced rules).

Maybe i am wrong, but then prove it.

----

@ Xpero (Below)

Oh yes, so true! :P

A software "firewall" generally sucks.

Let's just compare the virus scan engines:
NOD32: Best heuristics, fast, lowest resource usage, no false positives.
Kaspersky: None of them.

th3rEsa said,
A software "firewall" generally sucks.

Let's just compare the virus scan engines:
NOD32: Best heuristics, fast, lowest resource usage, no false positives.
Kaspersky: None of them.


From what you are saying you NEVER tried Kaspersky.

Best Heuristic from NOD? Don't make me laugh, that's on Kaspersky too, by levels.
Fast? Then maybe NOD has problems with Vista which hangs the system some times (which doesn't happen with Kaspersky), on XP i don't know and i'm not interested anyway.
Lower resource usage? how much?
No false positives? You gotta be kidding me, so Firefox is a trojan right? When i installed NOD32 v3.0 and i've run Kaspersky it shows as a Trojan (i haven't updated the definitions)

Please post screen shots (small, thumbnails, or links), as well i'll post if i need.

EL1TE said,

From what you are saying you NEVER tried Kaspersky.

Best Heuristic from NOD? Don't make me laugh, that's on Kaspersky too, by levels.
Fast? Then maybe NOD has problems with Vista which hangs the system some times (which doesn't happen with Kaspersky), on XP i don't know and i'm not interested anyway.
Lower resource usage? how much?
No false positives? You gotta be kidding me, so Firefox is a trojan right? When i installed NOD32 v3.0 and i've run Kaspersky it shows as a Trojan (i haven't updated the definitions)

Please post screen shots (small, thumbnails, or links), as well i'll post if i need. :rolleyes:

I have NOD32 3.0 and FF has never come up in scan as trojan. I ran KAV and it slowed my pc down and I didnt much for the blinking "K".

Vettetech said,
I have NOD32 3.0 and FF has never come up in scan as trojan. I ran KAV and it slowed my pc down and I didnt much for the blinking "K".

Did you read the part "I haven't updated it"? That means NOD was showing a false positive.

See the link i have provided below, then you'll see why NOD is crap.

Oh well, whatever, if you guys don't want to see the truth it's not my problem, but please post screen shots.