Microsoft and others asks for the US government's permission to reveal data requests

Earlier this week, Microsoft offered a new statement on the allegations they have given private data from many of its online services to US government agencies. In summary, the company denied that it gives direct access of that data to the government but also said that it cannot reveal more about its data requests it receives due to current laws, adding, "If we do receive approval to share more information, we’ll publish it immediately."

Today, Microsoft joined with a ton of other technology companies, including Google, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo and AOL, in sending a letter to the Obama administration and Congress. The letter asks for the government's permission to have these businesses reveal more about the data requests they receive from government agencies.

The letter was sent by the The Center for Democracy & Technology, a non-profit group dedicated to more Internet freedoms. The letter wants the government to let "Internet and telephone companies to publish general numerical information about the different types of government requests they receive and the number of people affected." At the same time, the letter also requests the government publish their own reports that offer more information on the kinds of data requests they send out to those same companies.

Tony Soprano would want Microsoft to be more open about its government data requests.

Kevin Bankston, the Senior Counsel and Director of Free Expression for the non-profit group, even brought up a classic TV character in the group's press release, saying:

Basic numerical data about criminal law enforcement surveillance has been published for years without disrupting investigations or tipping off Tony Soprano. Publishing similar data about national security surveillance won’t make the American people less secure—only more informed.

It's highly doubtful that the Obama administration and or members of Congress will make any changes in their policies, at least in the near term, but these kinds of statements from technology companies are designed to show that they are not the bad guys in this tug of war with the government.

Source: The Center for Democracy & Technology via The Next Web | Image via Home Box Office

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Microsoft: $19.90 billion in revenue for Q2 2013; $900 million charge for Surface RT

Next Story

Leap add-on devices now arriving for pre-orders but they can't be used until Monday

10 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

Surely the NSA and co. would have put their equipment directly into the Telco's exchanges, bypassing the need to work with these companies directly? ? Except for EFS keys and other encrypted data, and i guess the association of accounts to peoples names... ?

Didn't Obama get the Nobel peace prize? When will the world wake up!

I meant as a matter of convenience because theoretically they have the ability to sniff and decrypt the data as it passes through the major switches of our beloved internet.

XerXis said,
Most of the IM conversations are encrypted, no way they can read those by sniffing the networks.

Yes the government agency whose name is synonymous with decryption services can't read encrypted messages by sniffing the networks.

It's a nice gesture, but both the U.S. Government and Microsoft have demonstrated they have no problem lying to the people they serve. I believe it's Corporate Fascism at it's finest and now that they've been caught, they'll say anything to appease the public. I'd be interested in knowing all the "favors" that were promised to not only Microsoft, but all the other corporate Benedict Arnolds. Anyone feel any safer? Of course you don't, none of this was ever for terrorism (as was it's declared purpose after 9-11), now it's for "criminals". Let's face it, anyone and everyone can be an Enemy of the State now and excusing this behavior through willful ignorance or forgiveness isn't going to change a damned thing.

While I don't believe Microsoft is completely innocent, don't forget these corporations most likely had gag orders in place issued by the Government.