Microsoft parody VMware with "VMlimited Man"

After the recent success of the previous Microsoft parody videos, Microsoft have made a third video that pokes fun at virtualization software company VMware with a character called “VMlimited Man”. The video features a guy called Tad, working at VMlimited, who attempts to sell clients limited virtualization packages from the past; a number of funny scenarios ensue. Microsoft encourages you to “watch what happens when you try to buy a cloud solution from the wrong company”.

The video has come out on the same day that the VMworld conference has started in Las Vegas, and is an attempt to sway users away from virtualization solutions that are “stuck in the IT past” like VMware are portrayed as being. At the VMlimited website, Microsoft conveniently links you to the Microsoft Server and Cloud Platform that they are pushing as the better solution.

Microsoft seems committed to making funny videos at the expense of other companies, and as Microsoft’s Frank Shaw mentions on the TechNet blog, “you can expect to see us continue to find ways to tell our story… using ads, tweets, video, infographics, and, we hope, more than a dash of humor”. If you haven’t checked out the previous internal parody videos (that leaked to the public), take a look at Gmail Man; the other featuring Microsoft executives car-pooling to work seems to have been removed.

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Rumor: HTC Omega for Windows Phone 7 on auction site

Next Story

Star Wars: The Old Republic beta weekends to start Friday

44 Comments

View more comments

MS is what 2 or 3 years behind VMware...? Since when are they stuck in the past? Not to mention MS's Office 365 (office cloud) service outages. Hilarious ad though.

Krieg said,
MS is what 2 or 3 years behind VMware...? Since when are they stuck in the past? Not to mention MS's Office 365 (office cloud) service outages. Hilarious ad though.

Uhm, ok, you're in the past.

dotf said,

Uhm, ok, you're in the past.

Perfect example why this is probably the most unfriendly forum I've ever seen, suppose it's time to go back to trolling. But before I go, let me say this: Even though your comment makes no sense whatsoever, yes, VMware is way ahead of MS's Hyper V products. Granted, MS' product is cheaper, VMware's is tried and true. Spending some time and doing a little research would prove my point. But sadly, I feel like I'm just talking to someone who doesn't understand visualization much less, VMware.

http://www.vmware.com/files/pd...atures-comparison-ch-en.pdf (for 4.1) but 5.0 has been announced and is again...dare I say...ahead of MS.

http://www.vmware.com/files/pd...ware-vSphere-vs-Hyper-V.pdf (5.0)

Edited by Krieg, Aug 29 2011, 5:54pm :

Krieg said,

Perfect example why this is probably the most unfriendly forum I've ever seen, suppose it's time to go back to trolling. But before I go, let me say this: Even though your comment makes no sense whatsoever, yes, VMware is way ahead of MS's Hyper V products. Granted, MS' product is cheaper, VMware's is tried and true. Spending some time and doing a little research would prove my point. But sadly, I feel like I'm just talking to someone who doesn't understand
visualization much less, VMware.

Nah it's not years ahead, and since hyper-v r2 and csv, it became the most obvious choice when clustering is concerned.

http://www.vmware.com/files/pd...atures-comparison-ch-en.pdf (for 4.1) but 5.0 has been announced and is again...dare I say...ahead of MS.

http://www.vmware.com/files/pd...ware-vSphere-vs-Hyper-V.pdf (5.0)


Krieg said,
Not to mention MS's Office 365 (office cloud) service outages. Hilarious ad though.

Unless im mistaken 365 was down for a few hours... Thats still 99.9% up-time (which i think is 8-9 hours of down time in any given year)
i think...

Krieg said,
....

Kudos to you for finding vmware brochureware on vmware's site.

I'm sure I read a similar piece of fluff from a Microsoft commissioned study which says the opposite.

I want to see some real independent source that says my dollars would be better spent with vmware.

Yes you can, and are actually encouraged to do just that.

Install Windows 2008 R2 as Server Core, rather than Full Installation, then install HV from the powershell console.

EDIT:
This was supposed to be a reply to Tony a couple of posts up, but I hit the wrong button...


Actually, your reply is to "Shining Arcanine", which replied to Tony's post. It is Shining Arcanine that made the comment about not being able to run Windows 2008 R2 without the graphical shell.

I grant it that MS hyperV server still needs some improvement to catch up with WMware server, but the video is about WMWare announced 'Cloud' services, not the servers themselves. I've been looking in their website and it does appear like the video points out that they are really selling you the servers, not cloud services. Cloud services are about you buy the 'service', and another company operates the software and hardware and gives you tools to manage them. You are not supposed to be buying a physical server, that's just having a server running virtual machines, which we've been doing for years now. So, as far as I can gather from WMware site, if you have to buy the hardware, that's not cloud, and MS Cloud is a real cloud.
Regarding the use of comedy, well, MS has tried with the serious approach, never mentioning a competitor and Apple came up with the very damaging Mac vs PC ads, which started the hate and mockery that has become fashion these days. Unfortunately, with the short attention span of people today, seriousness and honor is boring, so if MS has to hit back a little to get attention, so be it. I'm tired of MS being so low profile in his marketing, they have so many products and so many features that most people ignore. For instance, Hotmail has many features and many thing Gmail is better... but have you seen the quick views for shipping updates with an active view that when it sees a tracking number in an email it displays tracking right there? Or when you compose an email how you can quickly insert movie showtimes, clip art, events and maps using the From Bing menu?

I don't really use Microsoft's Server offerings, but when I had to do some work with Hyper-V earlier this year it was pretty horrific. VMware/VirtualBox is where it's at for me. Wouldn't want to touch Hyper-V ever again, the way it handles networking is such a pain in the bum.

Guess I don't understand the IT server market at all so am not sure why Microsoft is picking on VMWare. I purchased VMWare Fusion and a license to Windows 7 to run on my Macbook...seems like cooperating products, not competing products.

The thing is, Windows Virtual PC is much more inferior than VMWare, for instance VMWare can run on any Windows machine, Virtual PC can only run on Windows 7 Pro, Enterprise and Ultimate, arbitrarily locking it into a different edition of the same OS. Also talk about being stuck in the past, VPC 2007? Really?

Azies said,
The thing is, Windows Virtual PC is much more inferior than VMWare, for instance VMWare can run on any Windows machine, Virtual PC can only run on Windows 7 Pro, Enterprise and Ultimate, arbitrarily locking it into a different edition of the same OS. Also talk about being stuck in the past, VPC 2007? Really?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper-V

coth said,

Do you able to run Android x86 with Hyper-V? And do you able to use Hyper-V on your current operating system without constant switching between Windows 7 and Windows Server?

It's rather silly to even talk about desktop virtualisation, as that's not what this is all about. Virtualbox and Vmware workstation probably will be dead in the water anyway as hyper-v will be included in Windows 8, as Hyper-V is a hypervisor, the performance increase will be immense, so I wouldn't want to run either Vmware workstation or virtualbox anymore.

Please MS you are more that that, I work with VMware and It is ewesome, the interfaces, the administration, the performance, I just remember that the first time that I saw a HyperV presentation the presenter said, sorry guys we have problems with our virtual servers and we will give you access to our lab if you sent us an email, please MS If you want respect, you should be respect your competitor and demostrate that your product is better that VMWare Leader in innovation, remenber that you just arrived, and with this ticks and wiles, I hate all this kind of things, be more responsable and work to give everybody best solutions instead of tarnish the name of others. I thing all of this MS stuff is a Joke, Why Bill Gate let's his people do this ? ....

this is just hilarious, someone has a pretty distorted sense of reality, and it's just like boumboqc said....

Not used Hyper-V yet but I hear nothing but bad things. I use VMware ESX a lot and love it to bits.
Still, I like these videos!

I think a lot of you are missing the point here. They are poking fun at vSphere 5's ram capacity limits where you buy the software but you are limited in how much ram you can use per server per the license and as you hit those built in ram limits by adding more memory to a server you need to buy more licenses even if you are not buying more servers. Thats really all they are poking fun of. These restrictions are NEW to vSphere 5 and Hyper-V has no licensing ram restrictions only up to what the hypervisor technology currently supports. In short they are saying with vSphere 5 the more ram you have in your server the more you are going to pay which is true. With that said vSphere 5 is still a bit ahead of Hyper-V from a feature and functionality perspective but Hyper-V is pretty solid nowadays and superior in some ways with the right management tools (System Center Stack).

Commenting is disabled on this article.