TechSpot: Intel Core i7-3720QM: Mobile Ivy Bridge Review

Ivy Bridge didn’t create the splash we hoped for on the desktop, providing a modest performance increase over existing Sandy Bridge processors. That said, looking back on it, Intel only anticipated a 10 -15% boost, so many enthusiasts -- including us -- probably had unfairly high expectations.

Instead of breaking new ground in performance, Ivy Bridge improves efficiency, marking the arrival of Intel's 22nm design process which uses new 3D transistors. This allows the flagship quad-core 3.5GHz Core i7-3770K to consume less power than the more modest Sandy Bridge i5-2500K.

Granted, the 19-watt power savings we recorded in our tests probably won't excite desktop users, but it does present a tangible benefit for battery-bound mobile machines. Ivy Bridge's improved fuel efficiency should grant laptops a little more mileage away from wall chargers.

Read: Intel Core i7-3720QM: Mobile Ivy Bridge Review

These articles are brought to you in partnership with TechSpot.

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Comcast refuses to identify alleged BitTorrent pirates

Next Story

Online retailer Kogan slaps 6.8% tax on IE7 users


Commenting is disabled on this article.

Q6700 max tdp is 105watts.

Even though 105w is only at full pelt, I'd assume that ASUS tool is measuring incorrectly unless you just had it sat at desktop doing nothing at all.

'Granted, the 19-watt power savings we recorded'
I've got a quite outdated Q6700 and ASUS EPU reports it as using 9watts... Err?

"the 19-watt power savings we recorded in our tests probably won't excite desktop users" speak for yourself... when power costs a good bit of money every watt saved counts.. that's why I am currently researching on highest performance for lowest wattage desktop components

Thank God... I was very much worried if i should wait for Ivy bridge chipsets or right away buy the Sandy bridge i5-2500K. (for my medium budget gaming rig)