Trivia Tuesday: 5 Apple products you've probably forgotten

Love ‘em or hate ‘em, Apple has made a lot of products over the years. Needless to say, not all of them were hits, and not all of them are on display in the Museum of Modern Art. We thought it might be interested to delve back into the annals of Apple history and take a look at some of the less famous of Cupertino’s gadgets, and one of the first ones to catch our eye was the…

Apple QuickTake: Despite being early to the digital camera game and being a pretty solid product, Apple's line of QuickTake cameras are pretty much forgotten today. From 1994 to 1997, four models of the QuickTake graced the market, before being axed by Steve Jobs upon his return to the company he co-founded.

The QuickTake 100, pictured here, cost $749 when it was released in 1994, came with 1MB of flash memory, and was the first digital camera priced under $1,000

By and large, these were really simple devices, and crude by our standards - one of the great things about digital photography is being able to see your image as soon as it's taken, but you won't be doing that with a QuickTake. Remember that we're in the '90s here, so LCD technology wasn't exactly in its prime yet, and even though cameras from the QuickTake line featured fairly spacious displays, they weren't good for much, other than keeping track of your battery and memory.

iPod+HP: This just might be the weirdest product on our list. Even though it sounds like something that would make Steve Jobs, Jonny Ive and every single person with a love for Apple in their hearts collectively cringe and vomit, it was produced (and quietly killed) under their watch: an HP branded iPod.

What in the world could compel Apple to let one of their greatest products be defiled by a competitor? Distribution, believe it or not. Back in 2004, there weren't quite as many Apple Stores, and Apple really didn't have a very solid distribution network for the rest of the market. HP did, however, and it was because of HP that Apple was able to get the iPod into Wal-Mart.

HP offered a range of iPod models, ranging from the Classic to the Shuffle

HP branded iPods really weren't very different from regular iPods; at first there was talk of having them be colored 'HP Blue', but that fell through early on and they came out looking like regular iPods, but with an HP logo on the back. And even though Apple still handled the design and manufacturing, HP ended up providing support for them. Needless to say, this ended up creating a whole lot of confused customers.

As part of the deal, iTunes would come preinstalled on all of HP and Compaq's consumer desktops. It's more than a little ironic that Apple ended up contributing to the mass of pre-installed bloatware that comes with HP products, considering how they abhor the practice. 

PowerCD: Before the iPod, there was the PowerCD. It was really just a Philips CD player, but it had a cool Apple logo on it, included a horrendous remote, and let you plug it into your Mac. Cool, huh?

The PowerCD also supported Kodak Photo CDs!

The PowerCD did have one other feature that the competition didn't; taking advantage of its computer connectivity. It was marketed by Apple's 'Mac Like Things' division (we're not making this stuff up) as the perfect companion for the PowerBook line, so you could have access to your CD-ROM collection while you were on the go. So long as you didn't mind, y'know, lugging around eight pounds of plasticized crap everywhere you went, along with your 6 pound Powerbook.

Network Server: Just to give you an idea of how confused Apple was in the mid-'90s, here's the Network Server. Nowadays people like to complain about Apple not showing enough support for the pro-market by updating the Mac Pro, but back in 1996 Apple had a product that was even more professional.

The high-end 700/200 model retailed for $19,000

The Network Server wasn’t a Mac; instead, it ran IBM’s AIX OS, which was their version of Unix. The low-end Network Server 500/132 (catchy, no?) packed a whopping 32MBs of RAM and a 2GB hard drive – all of which were vastly expandable, for the record - into a conveniently portable 2 foot tall, 85 pound encasing, all for the low, low price of $11,000. Needless to say, they go for a lot less than that on eBay nowadays.

Macintosh TV: A TV set designed and manufactured by Apple? Been there, done that. Well, sort of. It was really just a black Performa 520 with a cable port. Actually, despite including a TV tuner inside the computer, the functionalities were completely separate, forcing you to take your pick between watching TV or using the ‘powerful’ 7.1 Macintosh. If it hadn’t been such a lazy execution, the Macintosh TV could’ve been revolutionary. Instead, Apple ended up dropping it after a 10,000 unit production run, and now it’s a highly sought after collectible.

The Macintosh TV could even save your favorite TV programs for posterity as individual, frame by frame .pict files

For interested parties, there’s still a wide range of bizzare Apple products to go around, and we could probably keep this list going for a while longer. And that’s not even touching prototypes. Still, we hope that this sampler was at least somewhat amusing, and that you’ll join us again next Tuesday!

Images via: Wikimedia Commons | IDG

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Microsoft still using Metro when talking about Windows 8 apps

Next Story

THQ cancels Volition's InSane

19 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

forgot all about the pippin, I remember liking the way the controller looked though never actually had the opportunity to try one.

Tha Bloo Monkee said,
I can't believe the Apple Pippin (video game console) wasn't mentioned!
Interesting read though

Damn! You beat me to it!

Tha Bloo Monkee said,
I can't believe the Apple Pippin (video game console) wasn't mentioned!
Interesting read though

Good point you've got there, but since I did this (http://www.neogamr.net/news/re...d-story-of-the-apple-pippin) fairly recently, I felt like it was played out Then again, that was from a defunct column on another site, but feel free to dig it out if you want to read about the Pippin. Can't fit everything into every article.

seeing this craptastic stuff makes me thankful I live a very long long way from the US and thankfully none of it ever made it here

Athlonite said,
seeing this craptastic stuff makes me thankful I live a very long long way from the US and thankfully none of it ever made it here

The irony of your post is that nine times out of ten, people gripe and moan over every tiny US-only anything. Especially on this site, for some reason.

A contest for US citizens? Hardware coming to the US first? Anything, anywhere, ever mentioning the US for any reason whatsoever? O lawdy, here come the euros with their pitchforks and mopeds.

Joshie said,

The irony of your post is that nine times out of ten, people gripe and moan over every tiny US-only anything. Especially on this site, for some reason.

A contest for US citizens? Hardware coming to the US first? Anything, anywhere, ever mentioning the US for any reason whatsoever? O lawdy, here come the euros with their pitchforks and mopeds.

I am not a EURO I'm a kiwi

"So long as you didn't mind, y'know, lugging around eight pounds of plasticized crap everywhere you went"
EPIC
----
I wonder what HP would have to show us regarding prototytes.

Seeing these old products reminds me of what a great time we're living in. These products are not even 2 decades old, and they already look ancient, compared to what we have today.

Can't wait to see how the tech world will be in another decade.

letmesee said,
Seeing these old products reminds me of what a great time we're living in. These products are not even 2 decades old, and they already look ancient, compared to what we have today.

Can't wait to see how the tech world will be in another decade.

I don't know... But I think the less we do or the more we're productive, the more boring life gets. But maybe that's just my impression.

Luis Mazza said,

I don't know... But I think the less we do or the more we're productive, the more boring life gets. But maybe that's just my impression.

To an extent, but if technology takes a 5hr job and turns it into a 5 second job, that is an extra ~5 hours for you to spend doing things you enjoy. If you don't enjoy anything aside from doing that job, then yes, you may be bored lol.

On dialup, i would spend 30 minutes waiting for my email to load. Now I can do that in a split second. A lot less wasted time!

darkpuma said,
To an extent, but if technology takes a 5hr job and turns it into a 5 second job, that is an extra ~5 hours for you to spend doing things you enjoy. If you don't enjoy anything aside from doing that job, then yes, you may be bored lol.

Technically speaking it would only be 4h55s but who's counting right

On dialup, i would spend 30 minutes waiting for my email to load. Now I can do that in a split second. A lot less wasted time!

For me, the older I get, the less I use my computer. Gone are the days where I spend time and money to upgrade my computer, dual/triple booting multiple OSes, or downloading every shareware/demo that catches my eye.

Nowadays, I use my (home) computer only to read the news, visit some blog sites, and watch YouTube videos. And many of my peers/friends are the same. And I also find myself using my phone more often.

The tech world have begun shifting towards ubiquitous/portable computing. I reckon next up is the rise of augmented reality (Project Glass, Google Goggles, Bing/Google maps, Pixelsense, Kinect, etc).

darkpuma said,
To an extent, but if technology takes a 5hr job and turns it into a 5 second job, that is an extra ~5 hours for you to spend doing things you enjoy. If you don't enjoy anything aside from doing that job, then yes, you may be bored lol.

On dialup, i would spend 30 minutes waiting for my email to load. Now I can do that in a split second. A lot less wasted time!


When five hour jobs turn into five second jobs, people start to panic about job security.

I dig progress, but this stuff is more exciting to the observer than the people immediately affected, sometimes. It requires a scramble to train yourself faster than others so you can show your company you still have value. Even then, if there were 10 employees hired for those five hour tasks, only one is really necessary anymore, and the rest will need a new job description (or a new job).

It's easy to say not to let your skills stagnate, but when today's necessary skills that are perfectly worth honing for a living become tomorrow's unnecessary fluff, stagnation isn't the problem--you suddenly need a whole new, entirely different, starting from the ground up skillset. What's more, people simply can't anticipate these events--predicting shifts in technology is a comically failure-prone practice.

darkpuma said,
To an extent, but if technology takes a 5hr job and turns it into a 5 second job, that is an extra ~5 hours for you to spend doing things you enjoy. If you don't enjoy anything aside from doing that job, then yes, you may be bored lol.

On dialup, i would spend 30 minutes waiting for my email to load. Now I can do that in a split second. A lot less wasted time!

But if you're an employee and your productivity increases, then you're immediately turning your remaining hours to spend more time with other things to do or making your job cheaper until it disappears.
If you're an employer, then a "harder" job turned "easier" makes more competition available by people who can do the same job cheaper.
So... It all comes to a temporary illusion of "more productivity is always better" or "easier is always better", because it also creates much more competition and less jobs available.