Trivia Tuesday: The day Carl Sagan sued Apple

These days Apple might have a reputation for taking people to court, but it hasn't always been that way. Back in 1994, Cupertino found itself faced with a very strange situation – it was being sued for libel by popular scientist - and brilliant astronomer - Carl Sagan. It all started when some brilliant engineer working on the Power Macintosh 7100 decided to make ‘Carl Sagan’ the devices internal codename, this was in hopes that Apple would end up making ‘billions and billions’ off of it, just like Sagan’s catchphrase.

It just so happened that the ‘Carl Sagan’ was being developed alongside the Power Macintosh 6100 (‘Piltdown Man’) and 8100 (‘Cold Fusion’). That didn't sit well with Sagan (or he just didn't want to be associated with the Power Macintosh 7100, depending on which story you believe), who sent Apple a cease and desist letter, ordering them to find a new internal codename. Apple did just that, and all was well, right? Wrong.

Beyond being a famous science advocate and astronomer, Carl Sagan was also an award winning Sci-Fi author

You see, we're just getting to the fun part. The part where Apple decides to change the codename from ‘Carl Sagan’ to ‘BHA,’ an acronym for ‘Butt-Head Astronomer.’ Ouch. If you're thinking that now would be the time to call in the lawyers, then you’re on spot. What happened next was a pretty straightforward legal proceeding that left one of America’s most well-known scientists looking a bit stupid: Apple appealed to its First Amendment right to free speech, and got the case thrown out.

The court gave this rationale for dismissing the case (taken from the original case file, which you can read here):

Furthermore, the tenor of any communication of the information, especially the phrase "Butt-Head Astronomer," would negate the impression that Defendant was implying an assertion of fact. The complaint states that Defendant changed the name of its personal computer from "Carl Sagan" to "Butt-Head Astronomer," and that "[t]his change was published by Apple, and it appeared in numerous newspaper articles and in other media." Any reader exposed to such a publication would likely have knowledge of the context in which the language was used. A reader aware of the context would understand that Defendant was clearly attempting to retaliate in a humorous and satirical way against Plaintiff's reaction to Defendant's use of his name.

A reasonable reader would further conclude that the use of the term "astronomer" did not imply that Plaintiff was a less than able astronomer, but that the word was a merely a means of identifying Plaintiff. Finally, a reasonable reader would conclude that the phrase "Butt-Head Astronomer" did not imply that Plaintiff was legally wrong in asking Defendant to cease using his name.

Despite this, Sagan went on to sue Apple again, this time for using his name and likeness. He also lost again. But it’s not all bad for him – while appealing this ruling, he reached an out of court settlement with Apple, and Apple officially apologized: 'Apple has always had great respect for Dr. Sagan. It was never Apple's intention to cause Dr. Sagan or his family any embarrassment or concern.’

The Power Macintosh 7100, which cost $2,999 at launch, did not, in fact, make Apple 'billions and billions'

This story’s not quite over yet, though; Apple still got the last laugh by giving the 7100 one last codename: LaW, short for ‘Lawyers are Whimps.’  

Images via Wikipedia & Wikimedia Commons

Previous Trivia Tuesday articles
Got ideas for future Trivia Tuesday articles? Let us know in the comments section below!

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Adult material accessible on the Xbox 360, soon.

Next Story

EU pushing for faster rollout of 4G LTE networks

11 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

Nowadays your house can be broken into and you thrown in jail without a hearing for invoking America's free speech right.

Oh how times were better back then.

And 18 years later they never did grow up.

"YOUR rectangular object looks like OUR rectangular object. SUE!"
"Why wont't we licence LTE? Because **** you, that's why!"

Ilys said,
And 18 years later they never did grow up.

"YOUR rectangular object looks like OUR rectangular object. SUE!"
"Why wont't we licence LTE? Because **** you, that's why!"


Yet they're one of the richest companies in the world...

They're doing just fine the way they are.

And yet it could have easily gone the other way, or at least stayed the other way. Apple only managed to survive the turn of the century thanks to Jobs taking the (interim) reigns and M$ "donating" a ******** of money in the late 90s.
However, none of that should distract anyone from how Apple used to (and still does) operate. It's only thanks to M$ calming down on their asshatishness that people can see what kind of company Apple truly are.

King Mustard said,

Yet they're one of the richest companies in the world...

They're doing just fine the way they are.

Ilys said,
And 18 years later they never did grow up.

"YOUR rectangular object looks like OUR rectangular object. SUE!"
"Why wont't we licence LTE? Because **** you, that's why!"


In all fairness, Carl Sagan was the whiner in this case, and I'm going to [very] uncharacteristically side with Apple.

Code names aren't marketing terms or IP. They're just internal ways of referring to a project in development. For completely and utterly failing to grasp this remarkably simple concept, Carl Sagan fail.

Very true. Sagan did overreact to the use of his name as a Code Name, for which most people would have felt honoured, but Apple's handling of his disapproval was very childish. Name-calling does not win any argument.

Joshie said,

In all fairness, Carl Sagan was the whiner in this case, and I'm going to [very] uncharacteristically side with Apple.

Code names aren't marketing terms or IP. They're just internal ways of referring to a project in development. For completely and utterly failing to grasp this remarkably simple concept, Carl Sagan fail.