US House passes an amendment which would remove funding from the NSA's backdoor searches

The United States House of Representatives voted in favor today of an amendment which would cut funding to the NSA's controversial "backdoor search" programs, which critics have long bemoaned as unconstitutional and even illegal.

The amendment, co-sponsored by reps Zoe Lofgren and Thomas Massie, sought to change a provision in the 2015 Defense Appropriations Act which would provide funding to the controversial backdooring which the NSA has installed on consumer products for years. Additionally, the amendment would remove the funding which enabled the NSA to warrantlessly search users' personal information, which includes emails, browsing history, and chat logs.

Proponents of the amendment, like representative Justin Amash, say the bill would go a long way in slowing down what they claim to be "expansive government overreach" conducted by the NSA. The EFF released a statement on the passage of the amendment, saying:

Tonight, the House of Representatives took an important first step in reining in the NSA. The House voted overwhelmingly to cut funding for two of the NSA's invasive surveillance practices: the warrantless searching of Americans' international communications, and the practice of requiring companies to install vulnerabilities in communications products or services. We applaud the House for taking this important first step, and we look forward to other elected officials standing up for our right to privacy.

The amendment still has to pass the senate, but with overwhelming support from the House (293 in favor and 123 opposed), it may not experience much opposition. And as NSA spying remains a major issue for many voters, we may see less and less public support for controversial NSA spying programs, especially during future election years.

Source: @EFF on Twitter | Image via Shutterstock - rally against mass surveillance

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Twitter's "GIFs" are actually MP4s

Next Story

Sharp has created a new Free-Form LCD panel

14 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

NSA wil simply say they do this to use it in Foreign countries, and get the fundimgmfrom there. Then they will continue to do the same to you americans as well.

Congress makes the laws. So... Congress gave the NSA the green light to do all this domestic spying (aka: taking a crap on the 4th Amendment). Congress needs to kill those laws. Don't 'defund', REPEAL. Every day I see what comes out of the elite in DC and every day I see less & less freedom and more and more tyranny.

No matter what they say or even do, the NSA will still have those powers and will also continue spying, despite the lies that they tell you. You cannot escape it.

Escape what? I understand that we have rights and nobody likes being spied but its not like they harrass you. Without the media, you wouldn't even know you have a backdoor in your system, a gov. made one too.
Moreover, NSA is far from winning the Gestapo title now.

Decebalvs Rex said,
Escape what? I understand that we have rights and nobody likes being spied but its not like they harrass you. Without the media, you wouldn't even know you have a backdoor in your system, a gov. made one too.
Moreover, NSA is far from winning the Gestapo title now.

That's like saying its ok to steal a few thousand bucks from someone super rich because they wouldn't even realize its missing if you didn't tell them. Its a crime to steal, just as much as it is a crime to invade someone's privacy without their knowledge. Such a farcical argument.

still_rookie said,

That's like saying its ok to steal a few thousand bucks from someone super rich because they wouldn't even realize its missing if you didn't tell them.

No, it's not. Stealing property is very different from privacy.

It's more like breaking in and photocopying some super rich dude's money. He's be upset you broke in (if he ever found out), but more confused than anything on why they wanted the photocopies which are basically useless.

I can't imagine how many crimes the NSA uncovers and ignores because 1) they don't care, and 2) that evidence may be inadmissible. They are looking for security threats, not criminals.