Will Google +1 answer Facebook's "like"?

Yesterday Google introduced the so-called +1 button. It is Google’s attempt to create its own social annotation so that it can improve on search, recommendation, and targeted advertising.

For now, the +1 button is put right next to each search result. When you click the button, you tell that you like this specific result – and this is logged into your Google profile. This can be used to improve search relevance. Also if you do a Google search while logged in your Google account, the recommendations can be crossed checked so that your connections’ +1 clicks are shown near the search results. This also could be taken into account for search ranking.

Google +1

At first glance the principle seems sound, but under scrutiny, that may become yet another failed attempt for Google to “get social”.

The most obvious flaw is that you don’t know whether a search result is relevant until you actually click on the link and look at the result page. Assuming the result page is relevant, would you go back to the search page to push the +1 button? Obviously no.

So this means that to be clicked, the +1 button will eventually have to move to the result page itself. People will put a +1 button on their page, hoping that users will click it if they like the page. But then, what’s the difference between a +1 button on a page and a Facebook “like”, or a Tweet button, or a Buzz button for that matter?

It makes a difference for Google: it owns the +1 button, thus it can derive plenty of information with the click logs without relying on Facebook or Twitter data. But there is no clear benefit to the user. A Facebook account captures the circle of people that you already share your status and photos with. Tweeting a link to a page is already a public recommendation. So why using a different circle – your Gmail or Buzz buddies instead of your Facebook friends or Twitter followers — for yet another sharing pool?

It looks that Google is frantically trying to make social search less dependent on Facebook and Twitter. With its social graph, Facebook could produce search results that are ranked according to people’s connections and friends’ recommendations -- Microsoft's Bing uses Facebook's social graph to better its search relevance. Many users already use Facebook as their main portal to the web, accessing friends’ updates and news from their Facebook page. There is only one step before they use Facebook’s future search platform preferably to Google’s.

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Twitter officially kills the #Dickbar

Next Story

Hotmail adds notifications for IE9 in Windows 7

22 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

It's no wonder that Bing's popularity is increasing with all the useless clutter that Google keep adding to their search results.

Hope this crashes and burns... If this take of we'll have websites that won't let you in until you "like"/"+1" them just with likes on pages/groups on facebook...

Really hope this is a april fools joke ^^

Let their organised Indian SEO companies exploit this feature.

Before we know it's there will be paid jobs online in order to get 10,000 likes.

PotatoJ said,
It's not a huge update, I think users will accept it (like blocking websites, or other things added to search).

I see "like" and "share" Facebook buttons everywhere, lots of Twitter button as well, and some buzz button to some extend. Truth is though, people rank the popularity of their page mostly via Facebook and Twitter.

Olivier Coudert said,

I see "like" and "share" Facebook buttons everywhere, lots of Twitter button as well, and some buzz button to some extend. Truth is though, people rank the popularity of their page mostly via Facebook and Twitter.

People rank the popularity of their page based on twitter and facebook? No.

Intresting argument! Google could easily have another failed attempt at social unless they don't market it like a maniac.

FMH said,
Intresting argument! Google could easily have another failed attempt at social unless they don't market it like a maniac.

Yes. But unless the advertisers back it up strongly, and the users adopt it, this may follow what happend to Google wave (at worst), or Google Buzz (at best, meaning, not a lot of people care).

Olivier Coudert said,

Yes. But unless the advertisers back it up strongly, and the users adopt it, this may follow what happend to Google wave (at worst), or Google Buzz (at best, meaning, not a lot of people care).

I wish Google Wave got adopted by people, it was awesome

Celestial Being said,
HAHAHAHA, side note, didn't people in Neowin complained about the +1 in the forum post a while back?

The other post doesn't explain why the "+1" is unlikely to work out...

Olivier Coudert said,

The other post doesn't explain why the "+1" is unlikely to work out...


Yeah, they were whining about how it wasn't contributing to the discussion. I think it's just a good way to say you agree quickly.