Personal Audio LLC files patent lawsuit against Apple

Personal Audio LLC has filed a second lawsuit against Apple. The first lawsuit that was pushed by the company, almost two weeks ago, resulted in a loss for Apple, to a cost of $8,000,000, as Ars Technica reported. Personal Audio LLC alleges that Apple has been responsible for stealing patents it holds. The Texas-based company holds patents and makes its profit by licensing these patented ideas to other companies. This is not the first time Personal Audio LLC has filed lawsuits against bigger companies; in 2009, they filed lawsuits against Apple, Sirius XM Radio, Archos and Coby Electronics over one of their intellectual properties. The property? The method of how a playlist is managed.

Having debuted in 2001, the iPod made use of a playlist system where users downloaded their playlist from their computer to the device. Personal Audio alleges that the company has been making use of their patented idea ever since this and sought an astronomical $84,000,000 over the event. Apple tried to change the flow of the case, though in 2010, all other companies targeted by the lawsuit bowed out and simply paid a settlement to Personal Audio. Late in the trial, Apple presented a 6,300 page document proving that they had developed the iPod playlist system alone. This displeased the judge and he gave the Cupertino-based company a monetary sanction of $10,000 for a late filing of evidence. His reasoning for the action was worded as below:

"in order to deter future similar conduct both by Apple and by other litigants"

This was the result of the first lawsuit filed by Personal Audio LLC. As Ars Technica reports, the company has chosen to file a second lawsuit against Apple, less than two weeks after having won their first. The reasoning for the lawsuit is the same as it previously was; music playlists. The only major change is that this lawsuit targets different Apple devices. Devices targeted by the lawsuit consist of newer Apple products, such as the sixth-generation iPod Nano, fourth-generation iPod Touch, iPad 2, iPhone 4, and the iPod Shuffle. Personal Audio's first lawsuit covered only the first six generations of iPod, the iPod Mini, and the first five generations of the iPod Nano. Apple argued that the newer products should be filtered out of the lawsuit; likely because they must handle playlists differently. The opportunity is one that means significantly more to Personal Audio LLC than to Apple. According to Apple's third quarter earning call, they have $76.2 billion in cash reserves, meaning that another strike for $8,000,000 from Personal Audio LLC would be insignificant at best.

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Google adds malware warning to search

Next Story

Android Market welcomes multiple APK applications

10 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

Ugh, I can't stand patents tbh... So you can't even develop something completely on your own and individually, just because someone else had the same idea and patented it? What a load of rubbish. This kind of thing doesn't promote innovation, it stifles it.

Also, I don't like Apple using their patents against others either, so please don't start calling me a fanboy...

d4v1d05 said,
Ugh, I can't stand patents tbh... So you can't even develop something completely on your own and individually, just because someone else had the same idea and patented it? What a load of rubbish. This kind of thing doesn't promote innovation, it stifles it.

Also, I don't like Apple using their patents against others either, so please don't start calling me a fanboy...


+1
Patent System need a complete remake, most patent are so vague that's it's impossible to really knew if you break one...

+1
Hell yea!! Apple deserves every lawsuit levied against them. I mean c'mon, how many people has Apple sued on past 6 months alone?

After Apple's patent lawsuits of late, I want every possible company with patents to start suing Apple. See how they like it.

Yagi said,
After Apple's patent lawsuits of late, I want every possible company with patents to start suing Apple. See how they like it.

Which is ultimate hypocrisy. If Nokia or Personal Audio LLC file lawsuits to protect their patents against Apple then its ok, but if Apple files lawsuits to protect it's patents its wrong or evil?!

You either agree with how the patent system is currently run or you don't. You can't treat companies differently who are doing the exact same thing, even if you hate Apple.