I can't find a lean, good looking, stable, WB theme. Please read.


Recommended Posts

I love some of the windows visual style themes that are out and about. Specifically, the MS Media Center "Royale", Luna Element, and some dark variations of the MCE Royale theme. They slip in just perfectly with every app I own, look good, are stable, etc...

However, before I discovered some of these VS's, I plunked down some cash for WindowBlinds. I did my research and read how the engine is actually superior to MS's in certain ways and actually CAN have a smaller foot print than the uxtheme.dll thingy. I've read in some places that WB5 actually uses your graphics card to render the GUI as opposed to the CPU. If this is true, I like that. So, does WB5 really use the GPU to render all of its skins or just the ones that use transparency?

Anyway, I'm on the eve of a clean install of XP. Although I image my OS disk all the time, I've simply accumulated so much bloat from trying various things and have changed a good amount of hardware since my original image that I made after XP activation. Before I go through the annoying process of reinstalling clean and all I want to settle on whether I will be installing WB5 or using VS instead.

I've searched pretty hard on my own but I've found the recommendations of NeoWin users to always be better than what I find. Basically I'm looking for a WB5 theme that's similar to the VS styles I've mentioned above. In other words, I'm not looking for something that radically changes the way everything looks but would love a good looking, USABLE, stable, and low memory usage skin that actually can perform more responsively than the regular MS skins (I'm guessing this would be due to hardware accel). Transparency is acceptable as long as it is tasteful, doesn't interfere with usability, and doesn't bloat the thing too much. No transparency is perfectly fine with me too.

Are my desires unrealistic. I'm not looking for a "minimalist" or "thin" skin. I happen to like the size of the "minimize, maximize, close buttons", the taskbar, and I even prefer the normal sized start menu button over some of the tiny little buggers i see in some skins. My monitor is a 22" widescreen so I'm not pressed for screen real-estate and I have my mouse acceleration turned up to get from place to place which makes those tiny little buttons you see in "aqua" skins and various "thin" skins harder to hit. Can someone point me in the right direction of such a theme? Will WB5 really increase the GUI responsiveness for me or is all I've read really just about the "potential" of WB5 vs MS VS, that doesn't really translate into real world performance?

My comp is a P4 2.4GHZ, 1GB RAM, with a GeForce 6200 256MB GPU. I have no intention of ever putting Vista on it (I'm going to wait until I get a new one), but I fully expect this machine to be able to handle XP with a little flashyness without missing a beat. Just in case someone suggests it, I can't upgrade it any further. I originally ordered this for my youngest sister when she went to college but she went abroad and I needed a computer so I took it over. Since I was ordering it for her, knowing how its a pain to lug around a lot of computer stuff, I got her a small footprint desktop so I'm out of RAM slots and the 6200 is the fastest low-profile GPU I could find. I'm not going to sink any more money into this thing.

Thanks in advance fellas. I haven't really posted here much but I read around a lot and have learned so much here.

Well, I'm a big fan of Eminence.

http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?ski...libid=1&c=1

It does have a fair bit of transparency involved, however for me it's just what I need and require. Won't change for quite a while :)

I have come to like Noire (http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?skinid=5328&libid=1)

Novum OS 1.2 Final (http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?skinid=5788&libid=1)

VisionZero Black Carbon (http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?skinid=6026&libid=1) because I'm a ###### for dark skins. All of which are (at least in my everyday use) stable, solid (finished), detailed, slick-looking skins (IMHO). Hope this helps!

There are so many skins that could fit your request, but I'm going to recommend skins that I use on a day-to-day basis and find them very usable.

I have to agree with the other poster, that Eminence is one of my all-time favorites. Very usable, but is a good use of transparency and style.

Others I like are:

Acrylic - http://www.guichamps.com/skins2006.asp?skinid=709

Vista Plus 2 - http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?ski...814&libid=1

Azenis 2 - http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?ski...969&libid=1

ClearXP - http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?ski...057&libid=1

Chocolate - http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?ski...974&libid=1

I could really go on and on but those are ones that are very popular, and ones that I personally use often. There are so many skins available and everyones "taste" is different, so I would also recommend heading over the to Windowblinds gallery on WinCustomize and browsing through there.

http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?libid=1

Your computer should handle WB fine, and I'm sure you will be happy with the results.

:)

Well, I'm a big fan of Eminence.

http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?ski...libid=1&c=1

It does have a fair bit of transparency involved, however for me it's just what I need and require. Won't change for quite a while :)

Finally a good looking, usable skin that features transparency (Y)

One thing I'd point out is that if you like Royale (the Media Center skin I believe) you could just run it under WindowBlinds.

The advantage is that WindowBlinds running the same visual style gets hardware acceleration and it'll skin non-theme aware applications.

For me, I also use it because if I right-click on the title bar, it'll minimize it (I have it set to do that).

I'd also like to add that you can use your existing visual styles with WB too, and take advantage of WB's performance benefits. Just use SkinStudio to convert.

What he said. ;)

The difference in speed should be pretty noticeable.

For one thing, you get caching. Try this: Run your desktop as the highest resolution you can. Now open say Notepad and move it around while running Windows XP's default style. You'll see repainting. Now, load WindowBlinds 5, any skin should do, now do the same thing. No repainting at all. It's all cached.

Your video card has how many megabytes of memory? In XP, uxtheme's using what? a megabyte? WindowBlinds will cache as much as you have video memory to improve performance.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!