Hardware or Software RAID 1? What best fit for my need?


Recommended Posts

Hi guys, currently I have a machines with these spects below which is running as a server with Windows Server 2012 R2 Std:-

Intel Core2Duo E6750

Asus Commando

4 GB

500 GB X 2 (In RAID 1)

As I meantioned above, the system is currently running in RAID 1 throw the hardware configration. What I am worried about is since this motherboard is old if would be extremly difficult for me to find another motherboard that has the same configration to start the hard drives with it again. With this thought I am starting to think that it would be better for me to switch from the hardware to the software RAID 1 since it will be not throw the hardware and easy for me to start again incase of hardware failer.

Please advise me and tell me what you think before I decide.

Thank,

I'm quoting this but have long held the view that "software" raid is actually better than so called "hardware raid"!

It?s a commonly held myth that hardware RAID is unconditionally better than software RAID. That claim is not true in all cases and is particularly wrong at the low end.
There is no "hardware" RAID. RAID systems are computers running code. All RAID is software RAID. The real issue is where the RAID code is running. In hardware RAID it is running on a dedicated processor. In software RAID it is running on the system processor.
Cheap hardware RAID doesn?t have write-back caching and therefore can?t give any significant performance benefit over software RAID. Note that there are different options for how RAID stripes are laid out which can affect performance, so if a cheap hardware RAID device gives any significant performance benefit over software RAID then it?s probably due to where the blocks happen to be stored working well with your filesystem. Which is of course a benefit you could get from tuning software RAID.

The Mythical CPU Benefits of Hardware RAID:

It?s widely regarded that hardware RAID is faster due to taking the processing away from the CPU. But the truth is that for at least the last 10 years CPUs have been fast enough and in fact it?s often the case that RAID controllers are the bottleneck.

CPU benefits aside, if your OS crashes, hardware RAID will have a better chance at retaining data integrity than software.

Precisely this. In a software RAID setup you're dependent on the drivers and software alone whereas a hardware server level RAID card is engineered and tested for reliability.

"2012 R2 Std"

Really R2 -- when did that come out ;)

Booting off a software raid comes with its own issues btw. Sure if you want to mirror some data partitions, that's pretty straight forward - but actually booting off a software mirror that is done in the OS your booting bit more difficult ;)

Keep in mind that if you use software to create a RAID environment you probably won't be able to access your drives when you boot from some other media like a CD or USB drive. This can really cause havoc if you store you backup files and/or disk images on the software RAID. When the time comes and you need to restore a drive, especially your boot/system drive, you find out that your backups are nowhere to be found. A hardware RAID doesn't have this problem.

I'm quoting this but have long held the view that "software" raid is actually better than so called "hardware raid"!

"It?s a commonly held myth that hardware RAID is unconditionally better than software RAID. That claim is not true in all cases and is particularly wrong at the low end."

You seem to be reading a lot of FUD. I actually addressed a lot of this back in 2009. Of course that statement isn't true in all cases - if you can't afford hardware RAID, it's not true. If you don't need hardware RAID, it's not true. It's great if your CPU can achieve 3 GB/s of ECC calculations - unless you need that memory bandwidth and CPU cycles to actually do something useful. But if all a system does is store data, then it is useful.

"Real" hardware RAID controllers perform the ECC calculations in dedicated hardware. "Real" hardware RAID controllers leverage hardware, firmware, and software to deliver features that will be unmatched in software RAID. A reasonable analogy for a layperson is dedicated vs. onboard (now onchip) graphics. Sure, onboard will give you a desktop, but dedicated will give you gaming!

Also, you're going to need drivers for hardware RAID cards just like you're going to need drivers for software RAID arrays. Drivers for hardware have just been historically easier to come by, but any Linux rescue CD worth the CD it's burned on should be able to activate and mount (if nothing else, read only) your fakeraid/software/hardware RAID arrays.

Sounds like what you need is something cheap, so either fakeraid or software RAID will be a good choice for you. Just be sure that you:

1. Document your configuration

2. Have a recovery procedure in the event a disk fails

3. Have a spare hard drive on hand or as a hot spare (preferably more than one)

4. Periodically verify the array to ensure the contents are correct

5. Perform regular, safe, and secure backups

With a RAID 1 it doesn't matter which hardware/onboard RAID controller you use because both disks are EXACTLY THE SAME, you can freely move between any controller.

WITH RAID 1 in WINDOWS, this is a real PITA. You will need to convert to Dynamic Disk. Dynamic Disk is not a common setup and if you need to use some 3rd Party Tools to repair your Windows installation then your options are going to be very limited in what you can do.

Above all else, BACKUP. RAID is not a replacement for a backup and only a BACKUP will save your ass, a RAID will only get you keep you running temporarily until you replace a broken drive but it does not save you from anything else.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Deal for those who want 1900 size electronics in their house? with 2026/7 hardware mhm.. not nice
    • Cheap labour, the same as the U.K. China pays their people pittance.
    • Those people that come over here on boats are already in a safe country, if they want to come over here then do so correctly though the right channels. I was born in the U.K, my family that came over here came so via the proper means. My partner came here via the correct channels, she also became a British citizen, she knows more about this country than most of them that was born here, including myself, she worked hard to do what she does. She will stick up for this country and have done a few times, when people from her own part of world have put the U.K down. We are not going to agree, all I said to start with is that maybe Trump has the right idea with this America first thing and maybe we should start doing the same. Maybe not as drastic as what he is doing, but we do need to sort this country out, we need to sort out tech instead of relying on the U.S and others. Again you have not shown why you are so annoyed that we have left the E.U and this is what it is all about? If you don't live in the U.K and live in the E.U are you annoyed that we left your little club? If you live in the U.K and is pro-E.U, then fair enough then I can see how it annoys you. Are you one of these people who lives in the U.K and have a holiday chalet in the E.U and can now only stay there for so long? If so, then that is bad luck. As I have posted before, I have no problem with people coming here to work, as long as they do if via the proper channels. We are out of the E.U, people voted out, and maybe if more people had voted instead of sitting on their backsides the results would have been different. But they like the E.U and our government thought no we would not vote to leave. How wrong they were, surprised me. I expected to wake up in the morning and hear on the radio that we voted to stay. As I said, we are out and have been for 10 years, we are not going to go back in anytime soon if we ever do, so we all need to make the best of how things are. Anyway, this is supposed to be a tech site.
    • Tim Cook: "The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills." What's the point of wasting time getting those skills if you can't get a job with them? Good Lord, maybe he and his cohort of CEO's who exported all these jobs to China should just shut the f**k up :D
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      215
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!