Recommended Posts

A buddy and I are trying to get a ubuntu live usb drive to boot. Boots on our desktops and our laptops, but the surface will see it and try to boot off of it during reboot (telling by light activity on drive).

We turned off secure boot and security options. It shows the Drive under "Boot from CD,USB,etc", ill pick it, the surface reboots, we see activity on the flash drive, a slight pause where it looks like its trying, then boots into 8.

Also, he has light bleed. 2 points at the bottom, and 1 at top. Anyone else notice this? Easiest way to tell is when the surface reboots and the WHOLE background is solid black.

Other then that, its working great, and so far he loves it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1135684-surface-pro-boot-from-usb/
Share on other sites

I've no idea about the surface pro architecture but are you using the right ISO type, i.e. EFI bootloader ISO if it's an EFI system?

Yes made sure of that. Tested by booting it on our UEFI desktops with asus/gigabyte boards and my macbook. Everytime it booted fine. I also see the efi files in the usb root dir. So i know its built correctly.

Make sure drive is formatted FAT32. Had same problem with mine - after changing to FAT32, worked perfectly. For me to resolve issues, I could not use any utilities to build the USB drive. Mount ISO image, format USB thumb drive FAT32, copy over contents of ISO image.

Make sure drive is formatted FAT32. Had same problem with mine - after changing to FAT32, worked perfectly. For me to resolve issues, I could not use any utilities to build the USB drive. Mount ISO image, format USB thumb drive FAT32, copy over contents of ISO image.

Hey thanks for the reply. What flavor did you end up installing.

As far as copying the contents how did you copy them. Like copy & paste, dd, etc.

Thanks again for helping

@Brandon: tried. Nothing. I thought Microsoft was over not detecting NTFS but I guess not. I had a feeling using fat would work but I wanted reassurance.

@Chris: The AMA really got me interested in getting rid of my RT for a Pro. I can justify the price if I can actually get Linux on there cause at work we use all 3 systems.

But if we can get this to work ill happily spend money that's going to pay off in the end.

won't the fact that it requires a secure bootloader stop you from using anything other than windows on it... and even then, only the installed version that it comes with?

Wrong. Surface Pro ships with secure boot enabled. But it can be turned off in the BIOS settings, according to Microsoft. How to access those BIOS settings has yet to be seen since people just got their hands on the Surface Pro so Google cannot help with finding anything on accessing the BIOS settings. I bet the manual or Microsoft has some information on this.

I believe a way to access BIOS settings is by going to PC Settings, then General, then Advanced Startup. Somewhere in those menus allows you to access firmware settings. From there you can turn off Secure Boot. But I have not got my Surface Pro to test that out yet. It should work.

won't the fact that it requires a secure bootloader...

He said he disabled secure boot.

And i've had trouble in the past where some computers don't read boot loaders correctly, I've had to use alternative boot systems on USB keys to make them go. YUMI is a good alernative if you'd like to try that?

@Sionic Ion: What you said* is correct. Ill make a tutorial hopefully tomorrow. Tonight as soon as I get home I'm not going to bed till I figure this out. So ill document everything for my sake and ill post it here.

@Raa: ill try that if B.Wolkens suggestion doesn't work then I was going to try grub 2 with efi support but I forgot all about Yumi actually sounds like a better idea

He said he disabled secure boot.

And i've had trouble in the past where some computers don't read boot loaders correctly, I've had to use alternative boot systems on USB keys to make them go. YUMI is a good alernative if you'd like to try that?

Hehe, fair cop, I missed that line... :)

So status is, ubuntu is installed, now wont boot. Surface gets stuck at grub, but it goes into grub rescue and I cant do anything in rescue.

Cant boot of live installation and install boot-repair cause surface's wifi doesnt get noticed. Ill try live booting the usb key on my desktop hopefully I have better luck at detecting a network and being able to install boot-repair and run it to see if that fixes it.

So status is, ubuntu is installed, now wont boot. Surface gets stuck at grub, but it goes into grub rescue and I cant do anything in rescue.

Cant boot of live installation and install boot-repair cause surface's wifi doesnt get noticed. Ill try live booting the usb key on my desktop hopefully I have better luck at detecting a network and being able to install boot-repair and run it to see if that fixes it.

if you have an windows install disk/iso/usb, I'd repair the windows boot loader then use EasyBCD to add linux to the windows boot loader

that way if you have problems you will know it won't completely break your boot loader :)

@Brando: How would I do that when during the installation of ubuntu, it installs grub and "blesses" the efi to load its bootloader?

Good news is I rebuilt the efi on the windows partition, this included the BCD Store and running "fixboot". After this, reboot the surface to windows 8 instantly!

Now, I have to figure out if I can use EasyBCD, or not.

I will keep this thread updated, at the end I hope to have a nice tutorial written up.

Thanks guys for all you help, anyone else who wants to chime in please do.

I'm not sure about Ubuntu (haven't messed with it outside of wubi or virtual machine for awhile) but most linux distros tend to have the option not to touch the MBR

(that's a thought as well, you could try wubi, it works essentially the same as installing directly but with less hassle on your end, and an easy option to uninstall from windows if you choose)

Wow. I cant believe I havent known about this sooner. I actually think this is the answer unless I can get rEFIt/nd to work, this also is cleaner and simpler.

Thank you very much Brando, im going to give this a try now, ill report back with what I find

Wow. I cant believe I havent known about this sooner. I actually think this is the answer unless I can get rEFIt/nd to work, this also is cleaner and simpler.

Thank you very much Brando, im going to give this a try now, ill report back with what I find

yeah, I've been using EasyBCD for a few years now, i much prefer the windows bootloader over grub and EasyBCD makes working with it a breeze :)

Status: Wubi works on internal ssd. If I install to an SD card (which will be the goal later, so internal is windows, and you can swap installations as you wish), then it fails.

The windows boot manager is to stupid to crawl the files, so it assumes "/ubuntu/winboot/mbr or efi file" is on the default drive and I cant figure out a way to edit the conf file and add "(sd card drive letter or whatever)/ubuntu/winboot/mbr or efi file". Ive googled and have found nothing.

Next I am working on installing rEFIt or rEFInd and i know that will work because my macbook with rEFIt installed will boot off the external sd no problem, be it wubi config or just normal copy and paste iso content config.

I will say, one of the most fun projects i have had lately. This is making me want one even more now

aren't rEFIt and rEFInd specifically for Apple's EFI?

i'm not sure if they're compatible with UEFI on other machines

i think your problem with wubi on external is due to how the entry is made into the mbr, i'm not fully sure as i've never tried it myself

have you tried the full normal install on the external card then using EasyBCD to make the boot entry?

aren't rEFIt and rEFInd specifically for Apple's EFI?

i'm not sure if they're compatible with UEFI on other machines

i think your problem with wubi on external is due to how the entry is made into the mbr, i'm not fully sure as i've never tried it myself

have you tried the full normal install on the external card then using EasyBCD to make the boot entry?

Right when the thread refreshes and I walk, i was sitting here typing that EasyBCD keeps making the entry for "C:" and not "F:"(external sd).

So, i've been try to figure out a way to manually change drive path from C: to F: but I cant find a way, but im not giving up.

rEFIt was made for Apple's EFI but works with UEFI (tested but not meant to be supported).

rEFInd was made for ALL EFI's in mind. Be it Apple or UEFI, actually the author focused heavily on UEFI since he forked rEFIt and it has been working great for Apple's EFI so far.

rEFIt was made for Apple's EFI but works with UEFI (tested but not meant to be supported).

rEFInd was made for ALL EFI's in mind. Be it Apple or UEFI, actually the author focused heavily on UEFI since he forked rEFIt and it has been working great for Apple's EFI so far.

good to know

offtopic: i was never able to get rEFIt to work with my macbook pro :( my best guess was that it's too new and rEFIt hasn't updated in forever. I've got a macbook pro 8,2 btw

Offtopic: i have a retina and rEFIt is support. You need to make sure your not using FileVault 2 or truecrypt, it doesnt have suppose for the. rEFInd does!

So, EasyBCD is ****ing me off because it creates the entry wrong, i change the drive letter and that fixes the drive letter, BUT, the path is "\NST\AutoNeoGrub0.mbr" and i need it to be "\ubuntu\winboot\wubildr.mbr"

I tried "bcdedit /set {uuid} device partition=F:\ubuntu\winboot\wubildr.mbr" but it says "An error has occurred setting the element data. The request is not supported."

If I could change the path to the correct spot, im pretty sure it would work.

Offtopic: i have a retina and rEFIt is support. You need to make sure your not using FileVault 2 or truecrypt, it doesnt have suppose for the. rEFInd does!

odd, i don't use any encryption and i've tried both the automatic install and the manual method and either way i just get that bug where it causes osx bootup to be exceedingly long
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Very fitting name since AI users have air where there brains should be.
    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      532
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!