Programming vs Networking


Programming vs Networking  

45 members have voted

  1. 1. which career field do you think has the brigtest future in America?

    • Programming (C++, Java, Web Development)
      25
    • Networking (MCSA/MCSE, CCNA/CCNP)
      20


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Over the last 5-6 months I've been debating which career field I should try to pursue and am having a little trouble making up my mind. I've been told to stay away from programming, that all (or at least the big majority) of the programming jobs are being outsourced to India. I've also been told that getting a decent networking job is no easy task, that most employers these days require at least a Bachelor's degree, 3-5 years experience, and a plethora of certs (A+, Net+, MCSE, CCNA, Etc..). Even seeing past the catch 22 of "how do I get experience if they won't hire me without experience", as well as the dwindling economy, it would seem that (good) jobs in IT are becoming harder and harder to land. I've even considered changing my major to something easier like Accounting, simply because there are so many job openings for them and the pay is still decent (40-50k). Anyway, what is your personal outlook on the IT field and what do you think the best career path would be if I decide to stick with an IT major?

Thanks,

Grunt

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/426395-programming-vs-networking/
Share on other sites

I voted programming, but if those jobs really are being outsourced to India (I only know of Microsoft doing this) then go for networking.

Someone in India wouldn't be able to set up and maintain a network for an American company. If you can troubleshoot well, you will always be in demand.

I am studying Comptuer Systems Engineering + Computer Science and i am overloading in some communications engineering units

personally i think (and i am studying to work in) the feild of portable and integrated computing is the way to go, this would require new networking technologies, however with those network technologies comes the programming of the packet structures and the protocols with which to access the networks.

if you are talking about network set-up and maintainance i believe programming is growing at a faster rate.

But if those jobs are going to other countries (I am just going by what he said) then it is hopeless. I can't argue with you though as I don't know enough about it.

I do know however that every business in the western world needs computers, networks and people to set up and run them.

Networking in my opinion isn't as important as programming. In most cases networking is simply knowing how to use some programs to do what you want. Programming allows you to build networking tools and much more.

Also, you don't need to go into a pure software company to do programming. There are a lot of non technical companies that need software automation.

Finally, networking is just as suseptible to "outsourcing." Instead of a person in india taking your job, a more robust computer program will allow a company to hire a much less qualified person with less pay to manage the program.

the portable and integrated computing i was talking about is like the development of the 'smart phone' which has grown rather quickly in recent years, also the networks required to communicate between smart phones and increase the bandwidth throughput capable with wireless radio networks (CDMA GSM '3G & 4G' networks)

programming jobs are being outsourced to india and the likes because of lower cost per programmer, however another reason is around the clock development cycles, cram the most man hours into one day.

given that the programming and pure computer science workforce is flooded with applicants (computer science is one of the most popular individual degrees) of average skills, unless you stand out from the crowd it would be hard to find a decent job. for that reason i suggest doing what i have done and taking a double degree, it may take a year or two longer, however in the end the job you will get will be a higher pay and there will be more oppertunities in the market for you

Thanks for the replies, guys. Really appreciate it. Perhaps I should just keep studying programming and spend a year or two longer in school and take some networking certificate classes (mcse, ccna). That way I'd have both bases covered. I'll just have to get over the fact that I hate this town and can't wait to get out of it :cry: Hopefully it will be worth it in the end.

I went for Networking, like you said its hard to start out in a networking position without experiance. I would research your area and see what they are hiring for as entry level positions and focus on that. Keep your education broad to don't be to specific because if you have knowledge in one thing and not another you are limiting your job search. Also you could always look into enter the market in a support position, like a help desk or somthing and then work your way up to something bigger.

Programming is fun and exciting, get to create new things and actually make something worthwhile.

Networking is dull and boring, oo lets connect a few cables together, badda bing badda boom. BOOOOORING.

So i choose programming.. :)

I would have to say "To each their own" on this one. I find programing boring and I have tons of fun with networking. You can run into some big challanges with networking and it is not just simply plugging cables in. Ever try configuring a Cisco Router? But like I said, it is a "To each there own" on this one.

I would have to say "To each their own" on this one. I find programing boring and I have tons of fun with networking. You can run into some big challanges with networking and it is not just simply plugging cables in. Ever try configuring a Cisco Router? But like I said, it is a "To each there own" on this one.

I agree with what you say, its just i'm not a fan of networking, it just doesn't interest me. :p

Coding grunts will always be needed. I don't mean grunts in an insulting way at all. :) I'm just saying that you sit there and grunt it out, coding everyday. I started out a CS major, then quickly changed. There's no WAY I was going to code 8 hours a day. I'm in networking. It's a versatie, changing environment, especially with VoIP on the rise. (Speaking of which, I may want to get certified for that! :)) However, both will be equally needed, but more coders are needed than network engineers, so it's a difficult question to answer. If you were to answer it by how many are needed, then programming wins. I null voted.

Surly that suggests that there is more of a future in programming as 'not as many' people can do it well?

No. He's saying that, since not as many people can do it as well, they are in high demand. However, like I said in my previous post, these points are...beside the point. (That sounded a little redundant of me.) BOTH are needed. What's the use of having good programs if they can't work with other machines? What's the use of having programs to function across networks if there's no functional network?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!