• 0

Definitive Best Backup Software 2011


Definitive Best Backup Software 2011  

105 members have voted

  1. 1. For Home?

    • Acronis TrueImage
      50
    • EMC Retrospect
      2
    • Nero BackItUp
      0
    • Norton Ghost
      6
    • Norton Save and Restore
      1
    • Windows Backup
      25
    • NTI Backup Now
      0
    • Other (Please specify below)
      21
  2. 2. For Work?

    • Acronis TrueImage
      51
    • EMC Retrospect
      4
    • Symantec / Veritas
      16
    • Windows Backup
      11
    • Other (Please specify below)
      23


Question

An updated "Best Backup Software" poll for 2011. Please use this as a reference when researching backup utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Please choose one app or N/A per category when voting.

Happy Voting!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/972816-definitive-best-backup-software-2011/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

People always mention Acronis when asked about best app for file backup. Acronis is more of an imaging/disaster and recovery product in my opinion. Very expensive and bloated just for backup purposes. I think of apps like Super Flexible File Synchronizer and SyncBack for personal data backup applications.

  • 0

I primarily use a program called SaftBackup.

  • It handles versions better than any other backup software I've tried.
  • It stores files in SQLite databases. I prefer this because it reduces the number of files created, and is much faster when you have to backup thousands of tiny files.
  • Backups can be encrypted and compressed.
  • Utilizes volume shadow copy for backing up locked / in use files.
  • It has a built-in file browser for extracting files. It's not great, but it works.
  • Technically doesn't need to be installed. I extracted the files from the installer, and I can run it from a BartPE CD if needed.

There's one thing I hate about this program: When deleting old versions, it vacuums the databases to free up space which takes forever.

  • 0

I'd vote for SyncBackPro by a company called 2BrightSparks.

It appears to have every conceivable option and setting you could desire.

I found it very complex, and I loved it because I had total control. The help file also explained everything so that I could understand how all the options worked before deciding how or if I'd like to use them.

It also backed up many gigabytes of files very quickly. More quickly than Windows 7 would have copied them, so I was impressed with the speed.

It's also not bloated at all.

I liked it so much that I bought a license very soon after trying it.

  • 0

Windows Backup and Restore does the job well enough for me :)

It didn't do the job for me....

1. No compressed image so backups are twice the size they need to be.

2. If you use Win7 libraries referring to data on drives other than C:, then the image of C: INCLUDES this data so it can be absolutely HUGE. If I want C: backed up then that's all I want!

I use Acronis True Image 2010 for now until I find something better (interface is a bit naff and illogical). It compresses and can do incremental image backups as well.

  • 0

For imaging HDD's Acronis True Image is the absolute best.

To make regular backups, I use Second Copy, a little program with tons of features and different types of backups and sync settings.

I keep my daily backups scheduled with it and also I use it to update/sync personal info and my USB stick with my portable apps.

Totally recommended. It's worth every penny.

  • 0

Can anyone suggest any software that allows for incremental backups as files are changed? I've seen a few options but they all work based on intervals rather than on change.

Also, I really want something that could do this from my server so I don't have to have an extra piece of software running in the background on my workstation. Ideas?

  • 0

for drive imaging i prefer 'Macrium Reflect' (it's FREE) and works well. that's pretty much all you need if you just want to do a simple image of a partition and then can restore it from a bootable disc which the program can create for you. it's pretty easy to use and straight forward.

download here (from official site)... http://goo.gl/urZO (also shows screenshots if you scroll down page)

the problem with 'Acronis True Image' is that it's not free.

p.s. for partition resizing i recommend the free EASEUS Partition Master... http://goo.gl/rIkv (i used that a while ago to resize my C partition as it was getting a little low on space so i took the space from D and added more to C (my C and D are on a single 250GB hard drive). i have Windows 7 x64.)

  • 0

Norton Ghost was good but now the dominant is in my opinion and it seems other's opinion is Acronis Image.

And my both votes went to Acronis.

  • 0

Was using GFI Backup Freeware until a few days ago have now switched to Easeus to do backup.

One of the cons of Easeus is that it doesn't use VSS.

One of the main pro's I like is you can just double click the backup file and it mounts and you can see the contents in explorer.

  • 0

Are there any backup solutions that:

* Can be setup to backup an entire drive

* Can be setup to automatically backup periodically (daily for instance)

* Incremental backup support

* Ability to restore previous versions of files (if there is a backup of them)

* Automatically manages the space on an external drive by deleting old backup files and doesn't hassle me about this

Basically, I'm looking for Time Machine (Mac OS X backup utility) for Windows. Hate to say it, but I've yet to find anything close to Time Machine for Windows. Sure, it lacks options... but it just works and I like how it doesn't bother me about disk space issues on my external backup drive. On top of that, you can boot from the external drive and restore files...its really top notch for a consumer oriented backup utility.

I've tried the default Windows 7 Backup & Restore. Blah, I don't want to delete my backup file every time I want to make a new backup. What if my new backup sucks? Am I suppose to have a stack of external drives in order to use Windows 7's backup utility efficiently?

Thanks for your input.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!