Recommended Posts

Hey everyone! I?m planning a new build, I haven?t done one in a while (my current rig is based on an Asrock 775Dual-VSTA motherboard). I?m going to be recycling a lot of the parts from my current rig to save some money. So, video card (GeForce 8500 GT Gigabyte GV-NX85T512HP), PSU (XFX P1-650X-CAH9 650W), hard drive & ssd, mouse & keyboard, sound system, and monitor are all taken care of. Here?s what I?m planning on buying:

The challenge I?ve run into is the heatsink. For $30 more, I can pick up a version of the motherboard which comes with the Thermaltake Frio Advanced. However, this is a large heatsink which might not fit in the case and which has been known to block memory slots. Also, it requires a bit of assembly, which I?m not too happy about. The other option is the Dynatron R14 which is around the same price. It?s much smaller and requires no assembly, but it?s cooling capabilities are dubious. I?m not planning on overclocking, so I just need a heatsink to keep the CPU from meltdown.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/
Share on other sites

Thats some nice choices there.

There is nothing to say about CPU, Motherboard and Case, but I would like to point out something about the RAM

Seriously, I've never heard of this company before. Might be just me, but no, I am reading that name for the first time.

And since, the RAM is so dirty cheap these days, why not buy an already established, reliable brand, like Corsair or Kingston or G.Skill.

Here are some recommendations:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820220571

and

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145218

You should be fine with either one of them

Also, if you don't plan to overclock, you should be more than fine with the stock cooler. There is nothing really wrong with it.

But if you insist on taking some precautionary measures anyway, there are, unfortunately, not many options.

R14 is your best bet, it looks like.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594637990
Share on other sites

Since this processor isn't widespread yet, there's a really limited selection of heatsinks. My recommendation would be to wait for Corsair to come out with a Hydro that will fit the 2011 socket. Maybe it will be a simple bracket you can buy along with one of their Hydro coolers.

It will save a ton of room compared to a fin & fan heatsink, so you won't have to worry about ram and pci slots being blocked. Plus they are nice and quiet, which is a plus.

Just an option. :)

Edit: I also agree that you should get better RAM. Since you're already dropping a pretty penny on the other parts, there's no reason to buy the cheapest crappiest RAM. Spend another few pennies and get the good stuff.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594637994
Share on other sites

Yeah, you should definitely check some offerings from Corsair, G.Skill, Kingston, Patriot e.t.c.

Forgot about that part entirely. My bad.

You should definitely wait for some of the better offerings, from the likes of Corsair and e.t.c

If its really a immediate one, then I'm afraid you don't have a choice.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594638032
Share on other sites

I use my computer to surf the web and watch videos. I do run some games. My current system is adequate for most tasks, but is severely hampered by the GeForce 8500 GT and 2 GB of RAM (limitations of the motherboard). So, even moderately graphically intense games don?t perform well. Any sort of multitasking where one of the tasks is computationally intensive is basically a no go.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594638134
Share on other sites

I?ve looked at LGA1155 systems, but if you start looking at high end boards with features like PCIe 3.0, SLI/Crossfire, USB 3, and SATA 6Gb/s, their prices aren?t that far off from LGA2011 systems. If the i7 3820 comes in around $300, you?re looking at a better value than the i7-2700K. And as far as futureproofing, I found the better choice is a low end LGA2011 system than a high end LGA1155 system.

As far as Intel?s support, they?ve already made comments about Ivy Bridge E, but I don?t plan on updating the CPU, barring some bargain bin updates near the end of it?s life.

Also, I plan on updating the video card somewhere down the road; it?s the next obvious bottleneck. Whether that's 6 months or a year depends how well it handles what I throw at it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594638546
Share on other sites

Nonsense, in my opinion.

I?ve looked at LGA1155 systems, but if you start looking at high end boards with features like PCIe 3.0, SLI/Crossfire, USB 3, and SATA 6Gb/s, their prices aren?t that far off from LGA2011 systems. If the i7 3820 comes in around $300, you?re looking at a better value than the i7-2700K. And as far as futureproofing, I found the better choice is a low end LGA2011 system than a high end LGA1155 system.

This is just not true. Z68 boards are much cheaper than comparable X79 boards.

I have an ASRock Extreme3 Gen3. It has PCIe 3.0, SLI/Crossfire, USB 3.0, SATA III, the works, and it only costs $122 at Newegg. The cheapest X79 board available is $210, and that's a barebones Intel board.

Next up, you simply do not need an i7 for "surfing the web and watching videos". Most hardened gamers only buy the i5 2500K, which is only $230 at Newegg, let alone an i7.

Now, since Z68 only requires dual channel, you wouldn't need to spend as much on RAM.

If you're following, this is already hundreds of dollars in savings.

There are also far more LGA1155 processors on the horizon (Ivy Bridge) than LGA2011 (Ivy Bridge-E), providing you with more options for upgrades in the future, making LGA1155 the smarter choice for the mythical "futureproof computer".

LGA2011 is designed for and targeted towards hardcore enthusiasts, which you've made it clear you are not. However, with all of that said, I'm not going to tell you not to build an LGA2011 system. Sometimes it's fun to spend money (crazy, I know) and build extravagant, beastly computers. But be honest with your intentions; don't tell people it's the more cost-effective option.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594639824
Share on other sites

Nonsense, in my opinion.

This is just not true. Z68 boards are much cheaper than comparable X79 boards.

I have an ASRock Extreme3 Gen3. It has PCIe 3.0, SLI/Crossfire, USB 3.0, SATA III, the works, and it only costs $122 at Newegg. The cheapest X79 board available is $210, and that's a barebones Intel board.

Next up, you simply do not need an i7 for "surfing the web and watching videos". Most hardened gamers only buy the i5 2500K, which is only $230 at Newegg, let alone an i7.

Now, since Z68 only requires dual channel, you wouldn't need to spend as much on RAM.

If you're following, this is already hundreds of dollars in savings.

There are also far more LGA1155 processors on the horizon (Ivy Bridge) than LGA2011 (Ivy Bridge-E), providing you with more options for upgrades in the future, making LGA1155 the smarter choice for the mythical "futureproof computer".

LGA2011 is designed for and targeted towards hardcore enthusiasts, which you've made it clear you are not. However, with all of that said, I'm not going to tell you not to build an LGA2011 system. Sometimes it's fun to spend money (crazy, I know) and build extravagant, beastly computers. But be honest with your intentions; don't tell people it's the more cost-effective option.

100% Agreed!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594640230
Share on other sites

Nonsense, in my opinion.

This is just not true. Z68 boards are much cheaper than comparable X79 boards.

I have an ASRock Extreme3 Gen3. It has PCIe 3.0, SLI/Crossfire, USB 3.0, SATA III, the works, and it only costs $122 at Newegg. The cheapest X79 board available is $210, and that's a barebones Intel board.

Next up, you simply do not need an i7 for "surfing the web and watching videos". Most hardened gamers only buy the i5 2500K, which is only $230 at Newegg, let alone an i7.

Now, since Z68 only requires dual channel, you wouldn't need to spend as much on RAM.

If you're following, this is already hundreds of dollars in savings.

There are also far more LGA1155 processors on the horizon (Ivy Bridge) than LGA2011 (Ivy Bridge-E), providing you with more options for upgrades in the future, making LGA1155 the smarter choice for the mythical "futureproof computer".

LGA2011 is designed for and targeted towards hardcore enthusiasts, which you've made it clear you are not. However, with all of that said, I'm not going to tell you not to build an LGA2011 system. Sometimes it's fun to spend money (crazy, I know) and build extravagant, beastly computers. But be honest with your intentions; don't tell people it's the more cost-effective option.

The LGA1155 system I was considering was the ASRock P67 EXTREME4 GEN3 (which goes for about $160 shipped) if you add the cost of a comparable CPU (i7-2600k) the difference is only $100.

I can understand saying my build is overpowered if I was building a new PC annually or biannually or with Intel?s tick-tock cycle. That?s not the case; the PC will last until it is not able to accomplish the tasks I require of it. If I manage to build a PC that I never overutilize, it will make me quite happy as I will never have to do another rebuild as I am right now. But the fact of the matter is, technology advances, and eventually this build won?t be able to handle the tasks I through at it. That could be 6, 8, 10 years down the road. IMO, paying the extra $100 to get a system that can stand an extra few years is worth it, because that?s one less build I have to do.

A LGA2011 system can run dual channel ram, there is no cost savings there.

I don?t plan on updating the CPU, barring some bargain bin updates near the end of it?s life. But, your right, there is something to be said for having access to low cost i5?s and i3?s. But if I go that route it?s really a guessing game of will I get bottlenecked by the CPU before the i7?s start to come down in price. You run the risk of paying more when trying to save money initially (the cost of an i3/i5 plus the cost of an i7) than just going with a higher end CPU and sticking with it. For reference, I looked at the i5-2500K, which would drop the price another $100 and would provided the performance I need for now, but when it starts to bottleneck, where are i7 prices going to be?

I would definitely encourage people who upgrade every Intel generation to look at LGA1155 systems (and I can even provide a pretty decent shopping list for one). But I think if you?re someone like me who builds a system and just upgrades it until it?s no longer able to do what you want, the better choice is LGA2011.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594640774
Share on other sites

In my opinion, an 1155 socket system will last just as long as a socket 2011 system. the performance gain over an i7 is minimal (unless you are talking about the high end $1000 SB-E processor). Plus you are paying a premium.

Anyways, seems like you are set on your choice :) Best of luck!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594640896
Share on other sites

Yeah dude, I too think you're making a mistake.

The obvious reasons to go with LGA 2011 are the 40 PCI-Express channels and the 8x memory slots. Now unless you plan on using some of those resources (eg, 6x cores OR at least 2 graphics cards OR at least 32GB of memory) you should go with LGA1155, get a 2500K, overclock it a-little (stay comfortable/low if you're new to OC! But Sandy Bridge on either platform demands it IMO!). Use the saved money to get a 28nm graphics card as soon as there is one you like on the market. The 2011 and 1155 are both Ivy bridge capable and neither will be haswell capable if you're thinking about that.

Your concerns about bottlenecking are useless unless you can think of spending $500+ for a six core when the price comes down. Unless you want 6 cores (or the other features), both platforms will be similar until Ivy Bridge. Actually, Ivy Bridge looks like it will come to 1155 6 months before LGA 2011 and that is some advantage.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594642074
Share on other sites

For that usage, won't a Sandy Bridge i7 system perform those tasks for a fraction of the cost? In addition, Ivy Bridge is right around the corner too..

I'd agree; socket 2011 isn't all that impressive unless you must have six cores, and pcie gen 3 now.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1056588-new-build/#findComment-594642086
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!