- 0
[C#] File Digital Signatures/Verification
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Posts
-
By ad47uk · Posted
Cheap labour, the same as the U.K. China pays their people pittance. -
By ad47uk · Posted
Those people that come over here on boats are already in a safe country, if they want to come over here then do so correctly though the right channels. I was born in the U.K, my family that came over here came so via the proper means. My partner came here via the correct channels, she also became a British citizen, she knows more about this country than most of them that was born here, including myself, she worked hard to do what she does. She will stick up for this country and have done a few times, when people from her own part of world have put the U.K down. We are not going to agree, all I said to start with is that maybe Trump has the right idea with this America first thing and maybe we should start doing the same. Maybe not as drastic as what he is doing, but we do need to sort this country out, we need to sort out tech instead of relying on the U.S and others. Again you have not shown why you are so annoyed that we have left the E.U and this is what it is all about? If you don't live in the U.K and live in the E.U are you annoyed that we left your little club? If you live in the U.K and is pro-E.U, then fair enough then I can see how it annoys you. Are you one of these people who lives in the U.K and have a holiday chalet in the E.U and can now only stay there for so long? If so, then that is bad luck. As I have posted before, I have no problem with people coming here to work, as long as they do if via the proper channels. We are out of the E.U, people voted out, and maybe if more people had voted instead of sitting on their backsides the results would have been different. But they like the E.U and our government thought no we would not vote to leave. How wrong they were, surprised me. I expected to wake up in the morning and hear on the radio that we voted to stay. As I said, we are out and have been for 10 years, we are not going to go back in anytime soon if we ever do, so we all need to make the best of how things are. Anyway, this is supposed to be a tech site. -
By JohnnyQ55 · Posted
Tim Cook: "The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills." What's the point of wasting time getting those skills if you can't get a job with them? Good Lord, maybe he and his cohort of CEO's who exported all these jobs to China should just shut the f**k up :D -
-
By +pmrd · Posted
I made a new Cinematic/Trailer for the game, this will be the intro, still a work in progress! I also updated the Steam page with a ton of new screenshots! 👀 https://store.steampowered.com/app/3925340/Incoherence_Dark_Rooms/
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
jessse3334 earned a badge
Conversation Starter
-
JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
Reacting Well
-
Excellence2025 earned a badge
One Month Later
-
Excellence2025 earned a badge
Week One Done
-
flexorcist earned a badge
Week One Done
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Tell a friend
Question
firey
So, for work I am developing an entire framework completely written in C#, though with the way it is written, I support the loading of DLLs written in any .NET 4 language (VB.Net, C++.Net, etc). The way it is written would be similar to Android, or iOS in such that people (customers) can create their own modules (dlls) and publish them in a market, download modules, etc, etc.
The way it is written is that I have a framework of DLLs which hold 90% of the functions, loading addons, network connection clsses, basically things that modules can have access to without having to re-write an entire class to support it each time. This also allows for me to update 1 DLL and have the change reflect on all modules that reference it.
There is then a base program which generates instances of classes, and provides the graphical interface for modules to be loaded into. What I want to do, is more or less verify the framework DLL's and verify the modules that I have written, as I include an Author as part of the module, I need to ensure that the Author is who the program says it is. Modules are fully controlled by the server so I am not worried about copying DLL files, though I would like to add in some form of protection to them. I am considering having random bytes throughout the DLL hold parts of the registered serial when the module is downloaded from the server.
So, in essence my question is two parts, I have searched on google but couldn't find anything related to what I want.
Part 1. A way to read a digital signature on the framework DLL files to validate the Authenticity of them, if this is not possible, then lump it with part 2.
Part 2. A way to protect / link DLLs to a specific registered copy of the core program. As the modules themselves aren't licensed, I need to figure out a way to sign them (however I would need a way to check the signature programatically), or have them be checked for
a) Validity
b) The core they are linked to when downloaded (to prevent copying). As I say it is server controlled, but cut the internet connection and there is no way to validate. Due to the nature of the market this is for, not everyone has an active internet connection, and those that do can be veyr tightly controlled, so a pure internet requirement is not possible.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1060826-c-file-digital-signaturesverification/Share on other sites
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts