Recommended Posts

so I can play sc2 in the morning but then the same day at night it lags really bad.Now it is not my pc because my pc would have the same problems all the time so I ask around and I am told that my 3g may be trottled.What does that mean?My 3g is the cheapest in the country I get lots of MB's for very litle money.

why is it that 3g connection can be fast in morning but later that same day your ping is suddenly higher and can your ping be higher because of peek times?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1126778-3g-unstable/
Share on other sites

Mobile broadband based on UMTS, HSPA, LTE etc are all shared. You can't fit an infinite amount into data into a specific spectrum.

Wired connection is superior if you're looking for low latencies and consistent quality.

Wired is shared much further away from you and is more stable due to travelning in metal wires and fiber optics.

I would never settle for a mobile connection at home.

Your connection gets a specific amount of time to send and recieve. When the wireless network has a high amount of users, then latencies will increase and your maximum speed will decrease.

Think of it like sharing a wired connection with other people. You're all trying to use the same cable and once the cable is saturated, everyone will suffer. The air between your computer and the nearest tower is one cable and everyone wants to use that single cable.

Barely anyone uses their home connection in the morning. People go to work in the middle of the week, they sleep longer and chill on weekends and don't use their connection until they come home from work or have done their daily chores.

Internet usage peeks when the general population is free from work and other things.

Cheaper means that the carrier has more users per slice of capacity.

Companies pay a lot of money but that's due to them paying for a higher capacity, a guarantee of how much capacity they can get at any given time and how stable it is.

So the cheap service you pay for is on the other side of the spectrum where the corporate services are on the opposite end.

You get what you pay for.

Also, mobile connections are bad for gaming where latencies are relevant to the performance of the game.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1126778-3g-unstable/#findComment-595403908
Share on other sites

OK can one ISP be a lot faster perhaps 1 that is not so cheap.And adsl is a lot slower that 3g right?I have a family member that uses another ISP but it is also 3g so I am thinking why that it maybe be a good idea to randomly test its ping several times and then compare it to mine.It is a lot more expensive so hopefully it works better.I am not even sure what other tecnologies are avaible in south-africa or my general area in the middle of nowhere.But a adsl connection should be a lot worse for gaming than any 3g right?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1126778-3g-unstable/#findComment-595403946
Share on other sites

ADSL is NOT slower.

Maximum speed might be lower, but the overall average speed and latency is very likely to be superior to cheap 3G.

Don't look purely on the maximum speed advertised.

I'm not in any way, shape or form familiar with internet services in South Africa.

But here, in Sweden, ADSL is superior to mobile broadband, hands down, even if you have a lower maximum speed over an ADSL service.

Mobile broadband speeds that are advertised are what's possible to achieve under perfect conditions.

Get ADSL, it's worth a try, trust me. However, if the phone lines where you live are bad, then ADSL is bad. But it's worth a true. Give it a shot, maybe you can get a few weeks or months of testing before you sign up for a long period.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1126778-3g-unstable/#findComment-595403960
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Playing video games on 3G isn't the best anyway. As your broadband package is cheap, are you sure your ISP doesn't have peak times where you just get throttled. The fact that 3G is shared too may be the answer to your question of why it lags so much during the day.

What kind of speeds are you getting on 3G to be able to game on it? It would drive me mad with the fluctuating pings.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1126778-3g-unstable/#findComment-595423146
Share on other sites

You get what you pay for. The less you pay for more likely it is that your provider will attract other customers also looking to pay as little as possible.

When cost is the main driving force, this makes it more likely that the ISP are also looking to cut their own costs resulting in lesser quality product (eg: spend less to get inferior networking equipment, spend less to have less backhaul that connects all their customers to the internet, spend less on staff and get less knowledgeable employees in the pool).

Even if you have an ADSL connection, your connection between you and your ISP will be fast, but then the connection between your ISP and the internet can be very slow at peak times if they are a budget ISP because all the ISP's customers will be sharing the same internet connection which goes from your ISP to the internet (this is called Backhaul).

A good ISP would buy a fast enough connection between themselves and the internet to ensure that even at peak times, it's still going to be enough for everyone, even if it is still probably going to be shared.

I would look at reviews for ISPs in your area for your area to see which are the good ones.

Generally ADSL, particularly ADSL2, ADSL2+, VDSL2, Fibre, etc. or other fixed services are going to be faster, because this speed is mostly constant between you and the ISP regardless of other users, it's just a matter if the ISP can handle the speed from their end with THEIR internet suppliers. With Wireless solutions, as said above, it is completed shared with all the other users connecting to the same radio tower in your area, regardless of how great the backhaul is from the Tower to the internet there is still this bottleneck.

Wireless radios work on different "frequencies" so that the wireless signals from other wireless radios do not interfere with each other. There is a finite amount of frequencies available for use because wireless radios are so common, from Radio Stations, Walky Talkies, CB Radio, Cordless Phones, Wi-Fi internet, Mobile Phones, TV, Radio, Military uses, Police/Emergency services, it is endless. A continuous group of frequencies is called spectrum (eg: all frequencies between 850mhz & 890mhz could be one spectrum).

The spectrum is auctioned off by the government to the highest bidder, and if it is your Wireless ISP who won it, then they only have between 850mhz and 890mhz to support all the Wireless internet connections in your area at once. In this example, 40mhz of spectrum (890mhz - 850mhz = 40mhz) can only possibly support a certain amount of users at maximum speed.

If you have more users than the 40mhz can handle, there are going to be slow downs unless your Wireless ISP can get new spectrum, which is a very long and expensive process to get the winning bid from the next government auction, and these auctions don't happen very often.

This is why fixed connections will always win over wireless. With a fixed connection, if the cable is not fast enough, the ISP can just dig up the ground and put in another. There is practically no speed limit (just have to pay for more digging and more cables) With Wireless, it is not so easy to add spectrum because there isn't much available to use, and when there is, it is an expensive long process to get it. You can't just start using someone else's spectrum without asking, because it will cause interference to their signals, it is extremely illegal and most likely would be hunted down by the government for doing it (Wireless radios can easily be traced to where they are coming from, just keep going in the direction where the signal is getting stronger).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1126778-3g-unstable/#findComment-595423174
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!