Server 2003 as Wireless Access Point / Router


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

[in Brief]

Currently I have a wireless router in the living room with a laptop connected to it, the laptop has a 160gb network share on it.

My question is this, can I just scrap the wireless router, connect my cable modem direct to my laptop, add a USB wireless dongle, install Windows 2003 server and somehow make a PC based Wireless Access Point / Router??

It seems a bit pointless to have 2 items drawing umpteen amount of watt-age when 1 could do....

Ideas?

A guide to perform this would be much appreciated!

Thanks,

SilverB.

It is possible, I've been doing it for the last six months. It's not really worth it IMO. You will have to run special hardware and software for it to work. I use this card and run a program named "Marvell 802.11g SoftAP Configuration" on my rig. It works well enough on a stable pc but the range isn't quite as good an actual wireless router. I'm saving up now to buy me a decent router.

  • 3 weeks later...

It is possible, I've been doing it for the last six months. It's not really worth it IMO. You will have to run special hardware and software for it to work. I use this card and run a program named "Marvell 802.11g SoftAP Configuration" on my rig. It works well enough on a stable pc but the range isn't quite as good an actual wireless router. I'm saving up now to buy me a decent router.

I have the same card under a different label. Mine is an Encore ENLWI-G. Any chance you could point me to a source for that "Marvell 802.11g SoftAP Configuration" utility? I haven't found it anywhere but the Marvell website, which looks like it requires some kind of company affiliation or something to get the files (I didn't bother trying to obtain a copy from them - I'm an individual, not w/ a company).

This SoftAP utility wasn't included with Encore's driver CD either. :(

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

It seems a bit pointless to have 2 items drawing umpteen amount of watt-age when 1 could do....

So the point of this is to save money on your power bill? Have you calculated how much power a wireless router uses?? Your talking pennies!!

From a quick search, looks like a linksys wrt54g uses less than 6 watts

http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54GS

total power is always arround 5.3 W

Using this calc

http://www.csgnetwork.com/elecenergycalcs.html

the lowest they have 6 watts, but even running that for 720 hours in a month your looking $0.44 in your being charged the national average of $0.10120 per KWH)

Figure out what the power consumption of your router is -- and do the math.. But its PENNIES!!

So you want to run a wireless Card in your server.. This card will draw power as well! Really about the only thing drawing power in the router is the wireless card.. Open one up.. pretty much a wireless card with some added circuitry.. So where is the cost savings?

Can a computer with a wireless card be used as a wireless router/bridge -- sure with the correct hardware and software.. But to do such a thing when you have perfectly good router as a cost saving measure is just, well crazy! ;)

BTW - if you do find software that runs on 2k3 and a wireless card.. There's a good chance its not going to be FREE, nor would I think it would support all the bells and whistles of a dedicated wireless router, or one running some 3rd party firmware..

Edited by BudMan

Not to mention that routers have NAT, firewall, dhcp and mac filtering in a very easy to use format. You don't have to worry about updates, AV and the likes. There is also less chance of the device being hacked.

Look at the newer routers. You can have NAS, usb sharing (ie printers), web servers, ftp servers and even a bittorrent client/server. All for less than the cost of a set of hard drives and wi-fi card.

There are also a lot better solutions to Server. Look at ZoneCD or Zero-Shell for that "wi-fi hotspot" setup.

Ummmm, I'm just lookin' for a utility that's compatible with my wifi card (Marvell 8335 chipset). I'm well aware of the plethora of routers which are plenty capable of being both very useful, and efficient on power consumption.

If anyone can help me out, great! If not, oh well. Thus far, two replies and no help.

Ummmm, I'm just lookin' for a utility that's compatible with my wifi card (Marvell 8335 chipset). I'm well aware of the plethora of routers which are plenty capable of being both very useful, and efficient on power consumption.

If anyone can help me out, great! If not, oh well. Thus far, two replies and no help.

So you try an hijack a thread, and then complain when nobody helps you ;)

What chipset is that card? Marvell W8300 ? If so - thats the same as the WL-138g, is it not? Which they provide the softap in their driver download

WL-138g

ftp://dlsvr03.asus.com/pub/ASUS/wireless/...8g/Eng_2265.zip

Description The ASUS WL-138g WLAN PCI Card utility release note and utility progrm in English, version 2.2.6.5.

a. The ASUS WL-138g WLAN PCI Card utility progrm in English.

b. Utility release note(2.2.6.5)

1. Update: SoftAP Driver v.2.5.0.6.

Which should work -- I would assume.. here some info on setting it up from a search for WL-138g softap

http://www.nat32.com/nat32e/htm/asus.htm

Yeah, I'm apparently hijacking a thread. Sorry. :D

Chipset is Marvell 8335 - identical NIC to the person who posted post #2 in this thread. His post is the main reason I'm posting in this thread - he claims to have a utility which I require, and the only difference between his card and mine is the sticker over the metal shielding.

The Asus drivers won't work (been there, done that, no go). I've tried drivers from a lot of places, some with SoftAP, some without, and with few drivers working (the Marvell generic drivers seem to be best, providing WAP2 capability, where the manufacturer's drivers don't). Aparently the SoftAP utility is embedded with the Asus driver/config utility, as it will not run - it says "hey, I don't see an Asus card, I'm exiting," because I don't have an Asus card.

I'm hoping "Mr. Dick C. Normous" might still have a copy of this utility approximately 3 weeks after his post in this thread.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!