Recommended Posts

Just looking for answers for a few things I've always wondered but google hasn't helped.

1. Is a long uptime bad for performance? (google returns talk about servers)

I sometimes dont restart my pc for a week or two on end. Is this bad for performance? Will it make my computer slow down?

I sometimes think it feels more snappy after a restart but may be placebo.

2. Why does restarting sometimes fix errors, especially after installing a program. Also, why do some software require restarts and some dont?

3. Dual core processors, is this like 2 CPU's in one. Is a 2Ghz dual core the same as having 2x1GHz CPU's?

4. Defragging. Why isnt this so important anymore. Also, what "frags" the computer if it needs defragged lol?

5. Whats more important, the amount of ram or the speed at which it works

6. At school we learned how data is stored, 1's and 0's. For numbers and letters.

I dont get how pictures are stored as 1's and 0's. How does colour work lol < got a google answer for this one

Sorry I know these are real basic but I've just always wondered

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1129384-few-basic-questions/
Share on other sites

Long on-times will keep the system heated up -- which could wear parts out faster.

Heat is not good for a drive's magnetic surface.

I would leave it off when you won't be using the PC for a couple of hours -- unless you were doing a download.

A once a day Restart may be good, because it may shut off sneaky programs, running in the background, that may not have completely stopped, when you Exited them.

Fixing errors may require taking out bad Registry entrys -- I use CCleaner, to keep it clean.

Running an Error check may put back missing, bad entrys.

You don't defrag SSD's as far as I know.

I still defrag a regular hard drive.

It gets 'fragmented' because it is a Random Access storage -- the system may write anywhere there is an empty space.

So the larger files may get written 5 or 6 places on the drive.

I believe the File index then needs to record an entry for each fragment location, slowing down the file access.

This can become quite a tangled up mess, over time, cause stress to the mechanical parts of your drive, having to search and reverse, back and forth.

3. Dual core processors, is this like 2 CPU's in one. Is a 2Ghz dual core the same as having 2x1GHz CPU's?

Dual cores should be a little faster than 2 separate processors, since the electrons have a shorter distance to travel, less path switching, etc.

I would just refer to the Benchmarks for the CPUs that you want to compare:

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/

5. Whats more important, the amount of ram or the speed at which it works ?

I would say, both. ;)

1. Is a long uptime bad for performance? (google returns talk about servers)

I sometimes dont restart my pc for a week or two on end. Is this bad for performance? Will it make my computer slow down?

I sometimes think it feels more snappy after a restart but may be placebo.

Sometimes if a program doesn't shut down correctly, some of the resources that it was using will be still taken up even though the program isn't running anymore. A restart is sure to free up those resources. (At least, I think that's correct).

2. Why does restarting sometimes fix errors, especially after installing a program. Also, why do some software require restarts and some dont?

Some updates require a restart of your system because they modify system files that are currently in use. Restarting the computer frees those files, allowing them to be modified.

I can't answer question 3. I've asked the guys here about processors before though, and the guys have been able to explain it to me.

4. Defragging. Why isnt this so important anymore. Also, what "frags" the computer if it needs defragged lol?

You have to understand how a mechanical HDD works. A HDD is made up of separate disks that are always spinning, and a magnetic head that reads and writes information to the disks. However, let's say that you have a file that is 4GB. The magnetic head doesn't wait for the disk to spin to a location that has exactly 4GB of free space. Instead, it will drop parts of the file in to any free space that it comes across first. This means that the file is spread out around the disk; it is fragmented. Defragging the HDD is basically telling the HDD to move the bits of the files around so that the entire file is in one location.

You're right, it's not as necessary as it once was, especially with SSD's, but as I've avoided that technological step for the moment I haven't looked in to why you don't need to defrag them. Again, someone else here should be able to answer that.

5. Whats more important, the amount of ram or the speed at which it works

I've never really understood that myself. I look forward to reading an answer from someone.

thanks for the answers guys! Really interesting

I never knew that HDDs just put the data anywhere! Thats so interesting.

Computers are so amazing, I figure myself tech savvy (as in I can use them quite well) but these things never cease to amaze me.

So i should still defrag on windows 8? I read somewhere it wasn't so important now but I never thought at the time, I guess it was talking about SSD's.

I have a 1TB HDD as my windows install disk with only 30% free now so I think I will do a defrag tonight :)

Just looking for answers for a few things I've always wondered but google hasn't helped.

1. Is a long uptime bad for performance? (google returns talk about servers)

I sometimes dont restart my pc for a week or two on end. Is this bad for performance? Will it make my computer slow down?

I sometimes think it feels more snappy after a restart but may be placebo.

2. Why does restarting sometimes fix errors, especially after installing a program. Also, why do some software require restarts and some dont?

3. Dual core processors, is this like 2 CPU's in one. Is a 2Ghz dual core the same as having 2x1GHz CPU's?

4. Defragging. Why isnt this so important anymore. Also, what "frags" the computer if it needs defragged lol?

5. Whats more important, the amount of ram or the speed at which it works

6. At school we learned how data is stored, 1's and 0's. For numbers and letters.

I dont get how pictures are stored as 1's and 0's. How does colour work lol < got a google answer for this one

Sorry I know these are real basic but I've just always wondered

3 - a single core processor can only process one instruction at a time. A dual core can process two at a time, a tri-core three, a quad core four, a penta-core five, a hexa-core six, etc etc. This means that an application can use "multi-threading" to enable the processor to run multiple things at the same time. A 2GHz dual core processor would be more like having a 4GHz single core processor, assuming that software is written to take advantage of both cores (i.e. it makes use of multi-threading).

The other benefit is that two processing cores running at 50% speed would use less than power than one screaming along as fast as it can.

4. defragging is just as important as it always has been if you want the best performance out of a HDD, it's just that so many HDD's are so fast nowadays that they're pretty efficient even when working with fragmented files. Ten years ago, drives were a lot slower and the overhead of working with fragmented files was more noticeable.

You're right, it's not as necessary as it once was, especially with SSD's, but as I've avoided that technological step for the moment I haven't looked in to why you don't need to defrag them. Again, someone else here should be able to answer that.

SSD's have no moving parts, so it's just as quick to access a file no matter where it is on the disk, whether it's spread into various parts or all in one place.

With a HDD it's quicker to access the file when it's all in one place as the magnetic head doesn't have to keep moving around.

SSD's have no moving parts, so it's just as quick to access a file no matter where it is on the disk, whether it's spread into various parts or all in one place.

With a HDD it's quicker to access the file when it's all in one place as the magnetic head doesn't have to keep moving around.

I knew the part about HDD's, and once I applied some logic to the idea of SSD's I came to the same conclusion. Thanks for clarifying. (Y)

1. See above. It's called memory leaks - due to certain complexity of sharing resources among all the programs OS thinks that some resources are still in use, because software didn't tell that it doesn't need it anymore (because it was terminated prematurely, probably because of an error... or a careless developer just didn't care, as it happens). Eventually, it starts to take while to keep up with all the bogus data.

2. Because some software developers are careless eejits. Save for driver installation and system updates, I allow no restart to take place and it works just fine.

3. It's two cores both running at said 2 GHz in a single package. Kind of like two separate processors, but still sharing certain resources like cache and... how to say it simply... scheduler, the thing that tells processor what to do next.

Beware of hyperthreading, though - it says it has twice as much cores even though it doesn't and gets away with it most of the time, because modern CPUs are very complex devices and actually succeed doing other tasks while waiting for data to arrive for another task.

4. Good answers already by good people above.

5. For general use - the amount. It's already the fastest type of memory, except for CPU's own cache (which is for temporary use, however). Bandwidth of RAM in modern computers exceeds 20 GB/s, access time is several tens of nanoseconds. There's little use in speeding that up, if an average SSD is 100 times slower to read/write.

Case in point, I've been running 8 GB at 1333 MT/s CL6 (so heavily OC'ed). Now running 16 GB at 1600 MT/s CL9 (20% "slower"), and there's no difference whatsoever.

2. Restarting shouldn't fix anything and shouldn't be used to fix anything except an issue with the OS. If a program has a memory leak, just restart that program. Any resources a processes was using or had reserved will be freed when it terminates. If anything, restarting will slow things down because the OS will cache files that have been read in RAM and so after a restart that cache will be empty and things will take (slightly) longer to open which is why bench marks have cold start times for applications and hot start times.

5. More RAM will stop swapping back to the hard drive and so will speed things up when you're hitting the storage limit of your RAM. Faster RAM will speed up operations of storing / reading things in the RAM so both can have an effect on performance. I would always go for the fastest RAM possible and enough RAM plus a bit so your PC won't start swapping daily.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!