Server 2003 as Wireless Access Point / Router


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

[in Brief]

Currently I have a wireless router in the living room with a laptop connected to it, the laptop has a 160gb network share on it.

My question is this, can I just scrap the wireless router, connect my cable modem direct to my laptop, add a USB wireless dongle, install Windows 2003 server and somehow make a PC based Wireless Access Point / Router??

It seems a bit pointless to have 2 items drawing umpteen amount of watt-age when 1 could do....

Ideas?

A guide to perform this would be much appreciated!

Thanks,

SilverB.

It is possible, I've been doing it for the last six months. It's not really worth it IMO. You will have to run special hardware and software for it to work. I use this card and run a program named "Marvell 802.11g SoftAP Configuration" on my rig. It works well enough on a stable pc but the range isn't quite as good an actual wireless router. I'm saving up now to buy me a decent router.

  • 3 weeks later...

It is possible, I've been doing it for the last six months. It's not really worth it IMO. You will have to run special hardware and software for it to work. I use this card and run a program named "Marvell 802.11g SoftAP Configuration" on my rig. It works well enough on a stable pc but the range isn't quite as good an actual wireless router. I'm saving up now to buy me a decent router.

I have the same card under a different label. Mine is an Encore ENLWI-G. Any chance you could point me to a source for that "Marvell 802.11g SoftAP Configuration" utility? I haven't found it anywhere but the Marvell website, which looks like it requires some kind of company affiliation or something to get the files (I didn't bother trying to obtain a copy from them - I'm an individual, not w/ a company).

This SoftAP utility wasn't included with Encore's driver CD either. :(

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

It seems a bit pointless to have 2 items drawing umpteen amount of watt-age when 1 could do....

So the point of this is to save money on your power bill? Have you calculated how much power a wireless router uses?? Your talking pennies!!

From a quick search, looks like a linksys wrt54g uses less than 6 watts

http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54GS

total power is always arround 5.3 W

Using this calc

http://www.csgnetwork.com/elecenergycalcs.html

the lowest they have 6 watts, but even running that for 720 hours in a month your looking $0.44 in your being charged the national average of $0.10120 per KWH)

Figure out what the power consumption of your router is -- and do the math.. But its PENNIES!!

So you want to run a wireless Card in your server.. This card will draw power as well! Really about the only thing drawing power in the router is the wireless card.. Open one up.. pretty much a wireless card with some added circuitry.. So where is the cost savings?

Can a computer with a wireless card be used as a wireless router/bridge -- sure with the correct hardware and software.. But to do such a thing when you have perfectly good router as a cost saving measure is just, well crazy! ;)

BTW - if you do find software that runs on 2k3 and a wireless card.. There's a good chance its not going to be FREE, nor would I think it would support all the bells and whistles of a dedicated wireless router, or one running some 3rd party firmware..

Edited by BudMan

Not to mention that routers have NAT, firewall, dhcp and mac filtering in a very easy to use format. You don't have to worry about updates, AV and the likes. There is also less chance of the device being hacked.

Look at the newer routers. You can have NAS, usb sharing (ie printers), web servers, ftp servers and even a bittorrent client/server. All for less than the cost of a set of hard drives and wi-fi card.

There are also a lot better solutions to Server. Look at ZoneCD or Zero-Shell for that "wi-fi hotspot" setup.

Ummmm, I'm just lookin' for a utility that's compatible with my wifi card (Marvell 8335 chipset). I'm well aware of the plethora of routers which are plenty capable of being both very useful, and efficient on power consumption.

If anyone can help me out, great! If not, oh well. Thus far, two replies and no help.

Ummmm, I'm just lookin' for a utility that's compatible with my wifi card (Marvell 8335 chipset). I'm well aware of the plethora of routers which are plenty capable of being both very useful, and efficient on power consumption.

If anyone can help me out, great! If not, oh well. Thus far, two replies and no help.

So you try an hijack a thread, and then complain when nobody helps you ;)

What chipset is that card? Marvell W8300 ? If so - thats the same as the WL-138g, is it not? Which they provide the softap in their driver download

WL-138g

ftp://dlsvr03.asus.com/pub/ASUS/wireless/...8g/Eng_2265.zip

Description The ASUS WL-138g WLAN PCI Card utility release note and utility progrm in English, version 2.2.6.5.

a. The ASUS WL-138g WLAN PCI Card utility progrm in English.

b. Utility release note(2.2.6.5)

1. Update: SoftAP Driver v.2.5.0.6.

Which should work -- I would assume.. here some info on setting it up from a search for WL-138g softap

http://www.nat32.com/nat32e/htm/asus.htm

Yeah, I'm apparently hijacking a thread. Sorry. :D

Chipset is Marvell 8335 - identical NIC to the person who posted post #2 in this thread. His post is the main reason I'm posting in this thread - he claims to have a utility which I require, and the only difference between his card and mine is the sticker over the metal shielding.

The Asus drivers won't work (been there, done that, no go). I've tried drivers from a lot of places, some with SoftAP, some without, and with few drivers working (the Marvell generic drivers seem to be best, providing WAP2 capability, where the manufacturer's drivers don't). Aparently the SoftAP utility is embedded with the Asus driver/config utility, as it will not run - it says "hey, I don't see an Asus card, I'm exiting," because I don't have an Asus card.

I'm hoping "Mr. Dick C. Normous" might still have a copy of this utility approximately 3 weeks after his post in this thread.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
    • eSound Music 3.0.0 by Razvan Serea eSound Music is a free music streaming app that gives you access to over 150 million tracks from all genres. It allows you to search and listen to your favorite songs, create personalized playlists, and explore trending music. With an intuitive interface and smart search, discovering new artists and hits is fast and easy. You can even stream music in the background while using other apps. One of eSound’s standout features is its offline mode, letting you download and listen without internet access. eSound is widely compatible, working seamlessly across Windows, macOS, Linux, iPhone, iPad, Android, HarmonyOS, Amazon Fire devices, CarPlay, Android Auto, and more. eSound Music key features: Over 150 million tracks available Smart search for songs, artists, albums, and playlists Personalized song recommendations Continuous playback with auto-generated playlists Offline mode with song and playlist downloads Daily-updated trending charts and top songs Sleep timer to auto-stop playback High-quality audio support Customizable playlists and favorites Support for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto Works on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, HarmonyOS, Amazon Fire, and more Cross-device sync via account login Background playback while using other apps Download: eSound Music 64-bit | Portable | ~160.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Download: ARM64 | 116.0 MB Links: eSound Music Website | Screenshot | Web Player | Other OSes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!