• 0

[C#] File Digital Signatures/Verification


Question

So, for work I am developing an entire framework completely written in C#, though with the way it is written, I support the loading of DLLs written in any .NET 4 language (VB.Net, C++.Net, etc). The way it is written would be similar to Android, or iOS in such that people (customers) can create their own modules (dlls) and publish them in a market, download modules, etc, etc.

The way it is written is that I have a framework of DLLs which hold 90% of the functions, loading addons, network connection clsses, basically things that modules can have access to without having to re-write an entire class to support it each time. This also allows for me to update 1 DLL and have the change reflect on all modules that reference it.

There is then a base program which generates instances of classes, and provides the graphical interface for modules to be loaded into. What I want to do, is more or less verify the framework DLL's and verify the modules that I have written, as I include an Author as part of the module, I need to ensure that the Author is who the program says it is. Modules are fully controlled by the server so I am not worried about copying DLL files, though I would like to add in some form of protection to them. I am considering having random bytes throughout the DLL hold parts of the registered serial when the module is downloaded from the server.

So, in essence my question is two parts, I have searched on google but couldn't find anything related to what I want.

Part 1. A way to read a digital signature on the framework DLL files to validate the Authenticity of them, if this is not possible, then lump it with part 2.

Part 2. A way to protect / link DLLs to a specific registered copy of the core program. As the modules themselves aren't licensed, I need to figure out a way to sign them (however I would need a way to check the signature programatically), or have them be checked for

a) Validity

b) The core they are linked to when downloaded (to prevent copying). As I say it is server controlled, but cut the internet connection and there is no way to validate. Due to the nature of the market this is for, not everyone has an active internet connection, and those that do can be veyr tightly controlled, so a pure internet requirement is not possible.

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Very fitting name since AI users have air where there brains should be.
    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      532
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!