Vacation Policy Debate!


Recommended Posts

My coworkers and I are having a debate with our HR Department about a vacation policy.

It reads:

Twenty (20) working days vacation with pay in each year commencing in the fourth year until the end of the tenth year, inclusive.

The debate is involving people who are now in their 4th year, and we see the policy as granting 4 weeks of vacation for us. HR says, its for people in their 5th year.

What do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1122818-vacation-policy-debate/
Share on other sites

Well it says "commencing in the fourth year", so I would think it means sometime during the fourth year. I guess it could mean that it could be granted on day 364 of the 4th year, but realistically it sounds like you would be granted it on the first day of the fourth year. I do think HR is wrong in thinking it means during the 5th year. That doesn't make any sense in the context of it.

Well it says "commencing in the fourth year", so I would think it means sometime during the fourth year. I guess it could mean that it could be granted on day 364 of the 4th year, but realistically it sounds like you would be granted it on the first day of the fourth year. I do think HR is wrong in thinking it means during the 5th year. That doesn't make any sense in the context of it.

Yeah were confused as to how they can come to that conclusion.

Could it mean that you accumulate the time in the fourth year and can only use it from the fifth year on?

Also, why do you have to wait four or five years to get four weeks holiday? It seems pretty mean. What happens after 10 years?

Its possible, but for the first 3 years you can use it before youve even accrued it. After 10 years its 5 weeks.

From my experiences when they say in they mean starting that year, sounds to me like someone in HR is being a douche

Before you get into a serious argument get your supervisor and manager involved, I bet it gets resolved correctly real fast if you do that, and threaten to take it higher if necessary, some managers especially can be lazy and that threat will lite a fire under their rear

If anything, the fourth year would be based on your start date in comparison with end of year date. Meaning, if you were hired on December 1st and End of year is December 31, you should not expect 4 weeks of vacation available to you from 2 Dec thru 31 Dec. and then another four weeks starting Jan 1

You should receive a percentage, which would equate to less than half a day paid vacation.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!