• 0

What should I start to learn for Web Designing: Photoshop or Fireworks?


Question

19 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I personal don't use Photoshop or Fireworks. I believe in Illustrator because of the layout structure you need to do in html/css.

  • Like 2
  • 0

Photoshop has more options and the most tutorials are available for it. I prefer to use Fireworks though. It's like a hybrid of Photoshop and Illustrator. It gives you also more control over the objects.

Smashing Magazine got some good tutorials on it http://fireworks.smashingmagazine.com/

And I think this is a good thing to read: http://fireworks.smashingmagazine.com/2012/07/03/interactive-prototypes-timesavers-adobe-fireworks/

Edited by hotosega
  • 0

i've never used illustrator much, but between photoshop and fireworks, i found back when i still used them that fireworks was much better suited for web design because you can manipulate everything as objects (so you can draw a box and easily change the width/length by just typing in the values you want) whereas in photoshop you can't do that to the same degree.

  • 0

Fireworks is about a kazillion times better than Photoshop for web design. The absolute control of objects with or without the use of layers is amazing. Fireworks dosent have the learning curve required for Photoshop, but almost reaches the same levels of awesome in terms of raster graphics when you reach the levels of awesome. Plus of course Fireworks has vector, which already gives it a jump on Photoshop. I guess Fireworks is the brain child of Macromedia and Photoshop is the brain child of Adobe. Photoshop = digital art, Fireworks = web / UI design/ general purpose. A few years ago I did a university project where I switched away from Photoshop to Fireworks for design in a flash app and everyone else used Photoshop, five years on they are still using my project to show off what is possible in the Interactive Media class.

  • 0

I love Illistrator, but I'll probably go the Fireworks route soon for webdesign.

I especially like how it manages all graphics files and there's no immediate need to switch programs.

Glassed Silver:ios

  • 0

See, personally I'm a Photoshop guy, but that's because I was doing this long before Fireworks came out. I never got in with Fireworks interface.

These days, I'm an Illustrator + Photoshop guy for web work.

  • 0

Fireworks, because that's what its made for, prototyping/wire framing and creating vector graphics primarily for web use. Photoshop is for editing/creating images (bitmap) with some features for exporting to web.

  • 0

I use Fireworks, Photoshop and Illustrator all together. For the majority of the web design I use Fireworks, create some elements (and edit photos) in Photoshop and illustrations in, well, Illustrator. I don't know what I'd do without either! :)

  • 0

I'm not a big fan of designing a web site using a raster image editor. In fact i'm actually against it. Specially with responsive web design. I'd go with something like Fireworks or Xara web designer if you are on a budget for web design.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!