New motherboard; 1155 or 2011 (socket)?


Recommended Posts

I'm building a new PC and the first part that I'm picking up tomorrow, is a new motherboard. But the thing is, I'm not yet locked on a CPU, so I don't know which socket I want more.

Was thinking to pick up i7-3770K which requires 1155 socket, but I don't know if in the future CPUs gonna use that socket in case I'll want to upgrade without the need to buy new motherboard. So my other option is to pick up i7-3930K which requires the newer 2011 socket, but then again, I have no idea if future CPUs from Intel gonna use that socket.

Didn't follow the tech development in the motherboards world for the past two years, so I have no idea what to pick. Motherboard with 1155 socket, or 2011?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1096109-new-motherboard-1155-or-2011-socket/
Share on other sites

Next years new consumer CPUs (Haswell) will need a new socket so 1155 isn't future proof in that regard. But 2011 isn't either, according to latest roadmaps Ivy-Bridge-E will be released at the end of 2013 (yes, thirteen) when Haswell for mainstream has already been released. So you'll be able to upgrade but only to CPUs that will technically be outdated and expensive. Go 1155 and use the saved money in two or three years to buy the mainstream-socket that's current then. Only exception would be if you 100% need 6 real cores right now, then of course buy 2011. But I guess if that were the case you wouldn't have asked. ;)

Next years new consumer CPUs (Haswell) will need a new socket so 1155 isn't future proof. But 2011 isn't either, according to latest roadmaps Ivy-Bridge-E will be released at the end of 2013 (yes, thirteen) when Haswell for mainstream has already been released. So you will be able to upgrade but only to CPUs that will be technically outdated and expensive.

Eh, that wasn't really helpful. After Riva's message I already started to pick 1155 motherboard (so far, GA-Z77MX-D3H catched my eye).

You need to ask yourself two questions.

1. Do you need 32GB or more memory?

2. Do you need 6 Cores?

If you answered yes for either of those questions get the LGA 2011 socket. And if you did say yes, get the 3930K. It's an awesome processor with 6 cores and isn't too expensive.

Now something to keep in mind as dr_crabman above me said, Haswell (the next architecture to replace Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge) is coming in 2013 but it uses a new socket called LGA 1150 making it incompatible with todays LGA 1155 and 2011 sockets.

You may notice that LGA 2011 comes with Sandy Bridge-E (E for Enthusiast) processor support whilst 1155 offers the newer Ivy Bridge chips. But don't be fooled, although Ivy Bridge is newer it isn't faster. It is merely a die shrink that hasn't resulted in any performance improvement but it has reduced power consumption from around 95 Watts to 77 Watts which isn't nothing to snuff at.

Unfortunately however this power reduction has not been beneficial to overclockers because Intel simultaneously changed the way they bond the heatspreader (the metal case on top of the processor) to the die beneath which has reduced the upper thermal transfer efficiency when the processors get hotter. What this all means is, it is harder to keep the temperatures under control when performing higher overclocks (4.6GHz and above) this may not be a concern to you but I feel it is worth mentioning just to be complete.

I hope this post helped.

Eh, that wasn't really helpful. After Riva's message I already started to pick 1155 motherboard (so far, GA-Z77MX-D3H catched my ye).

The situation right now is a bit complicated unfortunately and there's no clear answer possible without knowing exactly what you want and what the budget is. Do you want to pay way more for the CPU and mainboard now (and again for the processor when Ivy-Bridge-E is released) only to avoid changing the board in a few years? Do you need 6 cores or a maximum amount of RAM? If yes, 2011. But honestly the mainboard you chose shows me you're not really an enthusiast that wants high end so I'll go ahead and say that you'll be perfectly fine with a 1155-system.

The situation right now is a bit complicated unfortunately and there's no clear answer possible without knowing exactly what you want and what the budget is. Do you want to pay way more for the CPU and mainboard now (and again for the processor when Ivy-Bridge-E is released) only to avoid changing the board in a few years? Do you need 6 cores or a maximum amount of RAM? If yes, 2011. But honestly that mainboard choice shows me you're not really an enthusiast that wants high end so I'll go ahead and say that you'll be perfectly fine with a 1155-system.

First; Why did you cut the "e" from the "eye" in my post :D ? Secondly; what's wrong with the motherboard I linked? Picked it mainly because it supports both SLI and crossfire, as I was thinking to first get another AMD card and run crossfire and later, get two 690s when they get cheaper. And what's with both of you (you and Vice) talking about maximizing the current 32gb ram limit. My current 775 socket motherboard supports 32gb.

I'm surprised that you would want to run two GTX 690's on that motherboard. It will work but those are very fast graphics cards and you'll definitely want to do a lot of overclocking to keep them purring. It's basically like having four GTX 680's in a case. And that motherboard isn't really designed for overclocking. It doesn't even have an 8-Pin CPU power connector which would limit the power delivery to the processor for good overclocks.

I'd recommend instead something like the Asus Republic of Gamers Gene IV - It is X79 though.

Also the reason I said about 32GB of RAM is because the X79 boards can do 32GB at the low end and 64GB at the high end. It can also do 32GB very cheaply by using 8 x 4GB sticks vs 4 x 8GB sticks (which cost more than twice as much as the 4GB sticks and come in much slower speeds).

I doubt I'll need to overclock the CPU (i7-3770K) by much if at all, to not bottleneck two 690s.

Well what resolution do you intend to game at? Because if it's anything less than triple 1920x1200 displays then you will yes. Two GTX 690's is four GPU's at almost the same clocks as the GTX 680. It's the fastest GPU on earth and you'll have four of them. Even a stock 3930K will bottleneck that kind of setup in every game out right now unless you're pushing the resolution quite high.

Of course your FPS will be off the charts anyway but you won't get 100% utilization on those graphics cards in any game with only one display. I'd estimate about 40% even in Battlefield 3 @ 1920x1200.

First; Why did you cut the "e" from the "eye" in my post :D ? Secondly; what's wrong with the motherboard I linked? Picked it mainly because it supports both SLI and crossfire, as I was thinking to first get another AMD card and run crossfire and later, get two 690s when they get cheaper. And what's with both of you (you and Vice) talking about maximizing the current 32gb ram limit. My current 775 socket motherboard supports 32gb.

Really don't know what happened to the 'e'. Strange. :shiftyninja:

But wait, you want to buy 690s and put them on a small ?ATX-motherboard? Something doesn't add up here, the board is fine for a normal to low-budget system but I'm not even sure you'll get the maximum performance out of two graphics cards like that (PCIe-lanes are my main concern there). And no, a not-overclocked 3770K won't be enough. Maybe 2011 and a high-end CPU is indeed better for you but I get the feeling you didn't think this through 100%. ;)

Didn't noticed that the motherboard was micro atx. New pick: GA-Z77X-D3H. How's it?

edit: You know what? **** the SLI plan on 1155. Gonna pick a motherboard with crossfire support and shove another AMD card in it, until the new CPUs that require a different socket you guys were talking about gonna be released.

Any complains on http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/P8B75V/ ?

The B75 chipset is low end and according to Intel meant for "small business". For example you can't overclock with it so a K-CPU is completely useless. Get something with a Z77, the Gigabyte you linked to looks fine. ASRock is good too (way better than they were a few years ago) if you want something solid for a reasonable price, ASRock Z77 Extreme4 would be my choise in this price range.

:/ AMD? nVidia is sort of kicking ass right now, the 670, 680 and 690 are insanely good in every aspect.

As are the HD7870 and 7850 for their current prices. 7970 dito. 670 is of course a great value too but nV has nothing competitve that's cheaper than that, maybe soon the 660.

You're going to pay over 400,- for another 6990 (unless you find a great deal they are still quite expensive) but want to shove off a few Dollars off the mainboard price? I really don't understand your priorities here but okay. The MSI is again ?ATX, the Gigabyte fine I guess. Very barebones featurewise and not fit for great overclocks. I also don't like the layout, could be that the second 6990 will cover some or even all of the SATA-ports, which is a problem most sub-100$ ATX boards have as far as I can tell.

Alright, a few changes: I cut the K out of the CPU (**** the overclocking) and picked a new motherboard with better design: http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4140#ov

And checked this time that it's not micro atx, ffs. Any complains now? I believe it will hold nicely until the end of 2013.

So, purchased the motherboard. Now waiting for the salary to come in to buy the cpu, ram and another gpu. Did some thinking and decided that I don't really need the hyper-threading (the cpu going to be used mainly for gaming), so decided to go for the i5-3570k. After some minor comparing (http://ark.intel.com/compare/65719,65520) thought it's a good idea.

I was just thinking to overclock the i5 to surpass the i7-3770 and be done with it, until the next upgrade. I also doubt all the threads of the i7 going to be used in gaming.

So, any objections from the pros over here?

  • 2 months later...

Hi, I'm hoping I can jump in on this and someone can help me. First off, I'm not a hardware expert so please excuse any ignorance I have in this area (which is why I am here asking the question). I'm looking to buy a new PC and the main reason for it is video editing with Adobe Premiere and After Effects. Here is what I am looking at possibly getting for mobo and cpu...

Socket 2011: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3, i7-3820 and 32gb quad channel ddr3.

or

Socket 1155: GA-Z77X-UD3H, i7-3770 and 32gb dual channel ddr3.

Any thoughts on this or suggestions for a better system. Since my budget is between 1000 and 1300 both of these fit into it nicely.

Don't be fooled, the hyperthreading of the i7 doesn't hinder gaming performance at all, I have one and it's still a very fast gaming CPU, but if gaming is your biggest use you won't see much benefit from having it, it mainly shines for tasks like Photoshop rendering and video transcoding.

As for you scottishbullet, what will the most important tasks be that you're building your setup for?

Javik, I'm looking to buy a new PC and the main reason for it is video editing with Adobe Premiere and After Effects. I do NOT do any gaming so that is not a factor. I'm not too worried about having the fastest beast on the planet. In other words if a render takes 20 minutes compared 17 minutes I'm fine with that. What I don't want is for it to take 58 minutes like it does now on my laptop. LOL. I'm also fine to get a good system now and swap out parts later as I can afford them.

In that case then, you're likely to see no real performance difference with the Sandy Bridge-E platform, it's only really worth spending the extra money if you're going to go with one of Intel's 6 core CPU's. For quad core usage Sandy Bridge / Ivy Bridge LGA 1155 components will suit your needs just fine :)

Thanks Javik, I was leaning in that direction from what I had been reading. Now what about other components? I don't want a bottleneck. Also I'm thinking 16gb might be enough or should I bite the bullet and get 32? As for HD I'm thinking a 120gb SSD (again is cheaper going to mean less performance?) There's such a range that I don't know where to drop the $. I was also thinking of a 1TB Western Digital Black.

For case, Antec Nine Hundred two with a OCX ModXstream 700w power supply. Another big question is video card. There's just so many choices around the same price point.

Is there much difference between the i7-3770 and the i7-3770K. I know one can be overclocked but will that really improve the system by a lot?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!