Recommended Posts

Im in the process of rebuilding my home network atm and replacing my cisco 1701 that had its wan card killed in a thunder storm with a Cisco 877W to prevent this happening again im running it off the server's UPS and ive installed a surge protector on the phone line.

That just leaves the console port, Considering its a home network ive disabled SSH/telnet and all management will be done through the console port. I plan on plugging it into my KVM/IP switch (HP IP Console)

eea07602.jpg

Which has a male serial port, I have tested it on a dell switch and it works. So the problem is wiring the console port.

i was thinking running a cat-6 upstairs to where the router will be placed and then wireing a socket on one end (t568B) and connecting a patch cable between the routers console port. On the other end i have one of these (with a male end)

b7dec191.jpg

And thats where im lost converting t568B wiring coming in to a rollover serial cable . Should i stick with t568B or wire the whole thing as a rollover cable ?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1105021-cisco-console-cable-kvm-ip/
Share on other sites

why not enable ssh (ssh is disabled by default)...the average person isn't going to know that they need a specific software that isn't included in windows nor are they going to understand anything....on top of that you can specify to only allow ssh connections from 1 ip address and give your machine a static IP which would be the IP/machine that would manage it....do you really think that people don't open that port and only allow access from certain IP's on the internet? You don't match the limitation, you don't get access to a logon prompt... Instead you choose to do it the most difficult way possible to do such a simple task.

Id prefer to do the management via console to ensure access to the router while its booting or upgrading etc plus i find it simpler to manage multiple devices using the console rather than software inside an os.

I with sc302, the fact that your on a home network by very nature of "home" makes opening up ssh/telnet really a non issue. Now in a work/edu/public network sure limiting access ssh/telnet because a security problem.

But who exactly in your home would be accessing this other than you?

You seem to be making it harder on yourself vs easier. To be honest how often would you really need console access? Even on firmware upgrade, this can be done via ssh. Do it all the time, only if something goes wrong would you need console access. And then if it did happen, your what like 20ft from the thing?

If you doing it for a fun thing to do, that is one thing. But to be honest I don't see how console access via a kvm is easier than just opening a ssh session directly would be easier. Are you running some software in your OS to access these devices via console, or are you switching over your monitor/keybord to control said device? Because if the later, that is clearly less productive than a simple box open on your current desktop that allows you to freely multitask between your desktop (docs, internet access, copy/paste, etc.) vs console type access pushing a button on keyboard or device to switch what is displayed.

Good luck with your project, but seems wrong direction to me to be honest.

Yeah you are right i was going to do it to cut down on passwords and just have one enable password. Anyway i did put in a dedicated console line i was getting confused with the serial port wireing i just used t686b to extend the console cable they gave and used a gender changer on the serial port.

O_o....cut down on passwords by doing it the most difficult way possible, yep makes lots of sense.

ssh = 1 enable password btw, there is no telnet password. enable ssh.

Your thinking...

you have to get to the other side of the forest, you are given a hand saw, a plane, a car, and a very large digging machine. You have chosen the hand saw to complete your task of getting to the other side of the forest..but once done you have a clear view of what you need to access, but getting there is the most difficult process possible.

O_o....cut down on passwords by doing it the most difficult way possible, yep makes lots of sense.

ssh = 1 enable password btw, there is no telnet password. enable ssh.

Yeah in still learning cisco,

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      256
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!