Recommended Posts

ok, i'm SICK of hearing about the supposed spyware that microsoft includes with windows xp. i am now a paranoid user (sarcasm). someone please show me the light. tell me where it is, what it does, and how i can stop it. please, i want to know. someone tell me exactly what spyware is included in xp.

Edited by gameguy
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/134566-spyware-in-windows-xp/
Share on other sites

The only thing I ever heard of was in SP1 it was an ALEXA...run spybot it picks it up and removes it. There are quite a few non-essential programs, error reporting, windows messenger, etc. You may use these though...

check out: http://www.answersthatwork.com/Tasklist_pages/tasklist.htm

to see what processes you're running.

ah man.. i never thought i'd see gameguy making a thread like this

:rofl: it's just that people keep talking about it and i know they're talking nonsense. i am quite knowledgable about windows (edit: at least xp, i forget a lot about win9x :blush:), and to my knowledge, there is NO spyware in xp. however, some things can be interpreted as spyware (sending hardware/network info with bug reports, etc) but those things are either anonymous or there's another explanation for that particular thing.

There are bits it does send. Most of which don't ID you or your PC. Sometimes it will ask, but usually not (most are set to send by default).

All in all, nothing to worry about, but when I had XP, I disabled all of them out of habit. :)

Now I am a Linux user, and my data goes to Linus Torvalds! :pinch: lol

There are bits it does send. Most of which don't ID you or your PC. Sometimes it will ask, but usually not (most are set to send by default).

All in all, nothing to worry about, but when I had XP, I disabled all of them out of habit. :)

Now I am a Linux user, and my data goes to Linus Torvalds! :pinch: lol

This is an excellent example of someone asking for specific answers to the question "what spyware, where is it, tell me exactly", and some idiot spews forth the same old crap "oh, it's there dude..."

Congradulations, thanks for taking a dump in the thread.

Now...would someone be so kind as to answer the question?

I guess it depends what you define as spy ware, if you class bug reports and program crash?s sent to Microsoft as spy ware then most os's do this take linux bug-zilla, that sends bug reports but it doesn?t contain your name or anything like that.

At the end of the day we don?t really know what ms and other company?s really know about us. And you could go mad thinking about it, so look at it this way is it really a problem, granted I don?t like to think that a company such as ms would know so much about me but lets face it people like to think there?s a conspiracy behind things 99% of the time there isn?t.

My view is there?s no real spy ware in xp there might be error reporting tools but nothing that would send anything incriminating.

I hope my post is ok njlouch as I remember last time you posted it wasn?t well thought out, sorry about that im 15 and grated not very bright I did get an E in English on my mocks, so sorry if it doesn?t meet your standards.

Dan

This is an excellent example of someone asking for specific answers to the question "what spyware, where is it, tell me exactly", and some idiot spews forth the same old crap "oh, it's there dude..."

Congradulations, thanks for taking a dump in the thread.

Now...would someone be so kind as to answer the question?

Excuse me, but I was confirming that although WindowsXP does send out some information, it can all be disabled. Some of it is enabled by default, and none of the data personally identifies you or your PC.

The last comment was a simple joke (as it was ridiculously juxtapositioning Linus Torvalds into Bill Gates' position). I think you took it a bit more seriously than you should have.

so... there's only been one example? :huh:

alexa is just doing it's job. for it to be activated, the user must click the "related links" button in IE, which for some reason, i can't find right now :blink: anyway, YOU have to start it, and it's just doing it's job. it looks at the page you're viewing and searches for similar/related websites. if you don't want this functionality, just don't click related links and remove the button. some people use it.

It looks like everyone agrees that there really isn't any true "spying" going on with Windows XP. The bits of data are relatively trivial (unless you specifically give permission to, as in when prompted to send your configuration information along with error data).

The only ones who believe differently are the fringe radicals (who, unfortunately, tend to scream the loudest and most repeatedly).

there is another major spyware in Windows XP, its in WMP9

i have also heard that too. apparently, it connects to the net and sends the information of the media to ms.

also, there was an article on ntfs/neowin, i cant remember, it was about sending all your copy/paste information to them.

We don't know if there is spyware or not in xp without the source so either opinion may be correct

I think that WMP just sends track data out for cddb lookup... maybe. Not like Microsoft would find out that I listen to They Might be Giants very interesting. Now, Vanilla Ice would be a different matter... :blush:

As for saying that you can't tell without the source, that isn't true. A packet sniffer just listens to all traffic, and you can 'tune in' to the ones going to Redmond, if you wanted to. I think that they even make packet sniffer programs that can run in Windows (it requires a different driver that talks to the NIC on a more fundamental and direct level).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!