2006 Corvette Z06


Recommended Posts

Z06_3.jpg

Chevrolet introduced the 2006 Corvette Z06 at the North American International Auto Show. It is the fastest, most powerful car ever offered by Chevrolet and General Motors. It is comprised of an unprecedented level of capability and technology, making it one of the greatest performance values on the market. And with an unmistakably muscular appearance, the ?06 Z06 has a visual attitude that always looks ready to demonstrate Corvette?s winning attitude to any challenger around the globe.

Review

Specs

It affordable also... $89,900 CDN...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/381184-2006-corvette-z06/
Share on other sites

am i alone on this...

i hate the corvette.. the new design looks like they ripped off a ferrarri for the front end.. its not the fastest thing on the street.. with that price tag, i'd rather buy a mustang cobra.

what is it about the corvette that makes people go bannanas? i don't get it.

So the 2005 Z06 was a C5 and this one is the C6?

586627273[/snapback]

No, they were both C6, the 2006 though has a newer engine, and more horses, even with the new standard for measuring them.

@vice king: Off the line, there is nothing that can really compare with the Vette, without significant modifcations, at that price tag. 40-50grand for the base model, which alone can run around anything near that price tag. The new Z06, with it's higher price tag competes with muscle cars twice as expensive, and can even hang with the Viper, yet offer a smoother ride overall then the viper. The Viper was built from the ground up as a power car, the Vette was designed as a luxary sports car, which was evolved into a muscle car (just look at the 70's vette's numbers, through today's, they don't improve much until the mid-90's).

If I could afford a Z06, I would definitely buy one. As it is, I can't afford my '85 yet, gotta wait for graduation (it's paid off, but insurance for a student...)

am i alone on this...

i hate the corvette.. the new design looks like they ripped off a ferrarri for the front end.. its not the fastest thing on the street.. with that price tag, i'd rather buy a mustang cobra.

what is it about the corvette that makes people go bannanas? i don't get it.

586627367[/snapback]

You're not alone but one of the few. True it's not the fastest thing but find me a car for cheaper that is faster. It's runs with Ferrari's and Porsche's that cost twice as much, a mustang cobra is hardly the fastest thing on the street. Other than the new lights I don't see as much in common with ferrari's as with previous corvette's, I would hardly call it ripping off ferrari for a front end, would that be such a bad thing anyway since ferrari's look nice. I've never been much of a corvette fan but if they keep producing car's like this I might become one in a few years.

am i alone on this...

i hate the corvette.. the new design looks like they ripped off a ferrarri for the front end.. its not the fastest thing on the street.. with that price tag, i'd rather buy a mustang cobra.

what is it about the corvette that makes people go bannanas? i don't get it.

586627367[/snapback]

I'm not a big fan of either Corvettes or Mustangs...but this Corvette would suck a Mustang up and spit it out. I think it's a pretty sharp looking design, and considering it will run with Vipers, Ferrari, and other exotics the price tag isn't too bad. And it's only $65,000 USD....half the price of other cars at the same performance level. It's a 7.0 liter V8 and I think it ended up being a little lighter than last years model?

No, they were both C6, the 2006 though has a newer engine, and more horses, even with the new standard for measuring them.

@vice king:  Off the line, there is nothing that can really compare with the Vette, without significant modifcations, at that price tag.  40-50grand for the base model, which alone can run around anything near that price tag.  The new Z06, with it's higher price tag competes with muscle cars twice as expensive, and can even hang with the Viper, yet offer a smoother ride overall then the viper.  The Viper was built from the ground up as a power car, the Vette was designed as a luxary sports car, which was evolved into a muscle car (just look at the 70's vette's numbers, through today's, they don't improve much until the mid-90's). 

If I could afford a Z06, I would definitely buy one.  As it is, I can't afford my '85 yet, gotta wait for graduation (it's paid off, but insurance for a student...)

586627411[/snapback]

:no: I have to disagree with that statement, look at any L88 corvete, they have much more HP than the newer ones and were designed to be a pure muscle car, granted they don't have the handling the newer ones have, but they certainly had the HP. If I could afford a '68 L88, I would buy it in a second, but they are going for around $250,000 and up depending on condition, but it would be hard to find one, as they only made a total of 216 from '67 thru '69. but I'd rather have that than a newer one. :D . plus it was made the year I was born, so maybe I'm a little partial to that year, and that was when they changed the body style to the newer sexier one. I've been obsessed with the L88 series even since I started to drive.

OT: Does anyone know what year they didn't make a corvette? I remember when I worked for a parts store, when things got slow, we would call other parts stores and ask for parts for that year, and would get "I don't have a listing for that year vette", and we would say "Are you telling me that I don't have a **** sitting in my driveway that needs an alternator, or whatever part. lol.

:no: I have to disagree with that statement, look at any L88 corvete, they have much more HP than the newer ones and were designed to be a pure muscle car, granted they don't have the handling the newer ones have, but they certainly had the HP. If I could afford a '68 L88, I would buy it in a second, but they are going for around $250,000 and up depending on condition, but it would be hard to find one, as they only made a total of 216 from '67 thru '69. but I'd rather have that than a newer one. :D . plus it was made the year I was born, so maybe I'm a little partial to that year, and that was when they changed the body style to the newer sexier one. I've been obsessed with the L88 series even since I started to drive.

OT: Does anyone know what year they didn't make a corvette? I remember when I worked for a parts store, when things got slow, we would call other parts stores and ask for parts for that year, and would get "I don't have a listing for that year vette", and we would say "Are you telling me that I don't have a **** sitting in my driveway that needs an alternator, or whatever part. lol.

586628391[/snapback]

Yeah, I knew someone would call me out with the C2's. But look at the C1's first. They were more of a luxary car then a true sports car. The C2 stopped that for a while, but then with the C3 and the gas crisis, they went back to the luxary line. It wasn't until recent that they came back out with raw power. Now, they've never been a weak car by any means, just saying.

And for your quesiton, I believe your referring to the '83 corvette, which was indeed produced, just never sold due to the high number of problems. It was corrected, but not until late, and turned into the 84 model.

what is it about the corvette that makes people go bannanas? i don't get it.

586627367[/snapback]

Neither do I. The only reason I would want a Corvette is so I could drive recklessly without feeling guilty for beating the crap out of the car.

The headlights were blatantly ripped off Ferrari. While they look good on a Ferrari on a Chevy they look retarded.

Yeah, I knew someone would call me out with the C2's.  But look at the C1's first.  They were more of a luxary car then a true sports car.  The C2 stopped that for a while, but then with the C3 and the gas crisis, they went back to the luxary line.  It wasn't until recent that they came back out with raw power.  Now, they've never been a weak car by any means, just saying.

And for your quesiton, I believe your referring to the '83 corvette, which was indeed produced, just never sold due to the high number of problems.  It was corrected, but not until late, and turned into the 84 model.

586628806[/snapback]

I would have to agree. You know your vette's, most people can't answer that question. :) And there is nobody that owns an '83 vette, except maybe someone you designed and/or built it. I wish I was that lucky :) . That would be worth a fortune.

Yeah would love a Sagaris and thats about the same money as this.

586628494[/snapback]

The Sagaris is a beautiful car compared to the "American Crap" or whatever someone called it...but you can't buy them here in America (to my knowledge). Besides that there is about a $25,000 price difference and both do 0-60 in 3.7 seconds. I'm not saying I love the design or the car in general (not a corvette fan) but it packs more punch for the money...

Beautiful - Ferrari competitor at a fraction of the cost.

I'd take this over some snobby Euro sports car.

And to the guy that rather have a Shelby Mustang...well, I'll take this and be the one laughing at you in my rear view miror.

Not to say I don't love the Shelby's, but its a different class.

Gotta love the Pushrod OHV motor.. 2 valves per cylinder, displaces 7 liters but physically smaller than a 4.6 liter DOHC motor, gets better gas mileage than most v6's, has a big fat torque band that can be used anytime, about a thousand times more reliable than italian makes in the same class and it makes 505 hp. There is a version of the Corvette coming out at some point (so they say) called the blue devil and that is supposed to run over top of the Z06 performance wise.. I can't even imagine how fast the Ligenfelter version of this car would be!

C6 Z06 = the monster

There's nothing to compare with it in its price range. Amazing, amazing car. I've seen it dyno 430rwhp/410 ft-lbs torque without even being broken in.

With a header and redline oil, 490rwhp/470 ft-lbs torque.

Not only does it have amazing power, it can actually handle. If i had the money, I'd buy this instantly.

I would have to agree. You know your vette's, most people can't answer that question.  :) And there is nobody that owns an '83 vette, except maybe someone you designed and/or built it. I wish I was that lucky  :) . That would be worth a fortune.

586629297[/snapback]

While I am a Vette enthusiast, the only reason I knew that was because it's my birthyear.

The year I was born was so important, that Chevy had to stop production of the car I was destined to own.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!