"Windows 98 + ME *still* alive" campaign


Recommended Posts

Hello again!

An colleague told me to write this because he/she isn't registered here I think:

Windows 98 + ME *still* alive campaign

Spread the word

Actually, Windows 98 (FE = First Edition), 98 SE (Second Edition) + ME (Millennium Edition) are *still* alive and well.

Please keep in mind that Windows 9x [95/98/ME] based OSes are installed on over 70 million computers, out of which 50 million are running Windows 98, 98 SE or ME.

Most small companies, charities, schools and a lot of individuals cannot afford to upgrade to Windows XP or any other OS, even Linux, because they don't have the necessary resources and/or knowledge.

True, Linux distros are free, but someone needs to install, service, repair and maintain [in many cases] a large number of [eventually networked] computers, no matter what OS they may run, and those IT technicians must get paid.

Sure, the KDE/Gnome interface may look familiar to most Windows users, but there will be a learning curve to make use of it.

Do you think people are willing to go through such pain just to upgrade their good-working 98/ME computers? Ask them yourself.

Besides, those good ol' 9x based OSes are fairly easy and cheap to maintain and troubleshoot, even if Microsoft won't help anymore. ;)

The point is that...

Enthusiast power users, programmers and IT specialists provide *free* support in their spare time at various web sites, forums, blogs etc.

MSFN.org is the best known support forum for Windows 98, 98 SE + ME, and all updates, service packs, fixes, patches, enhancement packs etc... are free:

Unofficial 98 SE Service Pack forum:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showforum=91

95/98/98 SE/ME forum:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showforum=8

Your questions + comments are usually answered in a timely fashion by knowledgeable forum members.

This way Windows 98/98 SE/ME OSes can be safely used even on modern, fast computers for every conceivable purpose, including playing hardware demanding games [if you have the necessary hardware that is ;)], desktop publishing, 3D graphics rendering, high-end A/V editing, CD/DVD burning, programming, internet browsing etc.

* System Updates:

98 SE SP2:

http://exuberant.ms11.net/98sesp.html

98 FE SP1:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=44732

ME SP1:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=61407

Native USB Drivers for 98 SE:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=43605

MS IE 6.0 SP1 Updates Pack:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=77706

98/98 SE Upgrade Pack:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=72297

98 SE Cumulative Update:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=50611

98, 98 SE + ME updates + (hot)fixes:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=46581

* Enhancement + Transformation Packs:

98SE2ME:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=46349

98SEMP10:

http://www.mdgx.com/wmp.htm#98MP10

Revolutions Pack:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=58357

Kernel XP:

http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=71476

* Individual OS Updates:

98:

http://www.mdgx.com/web.htm#W98

98 SP1:

http://www.mdgx.com/web.htm#SP1

98 SE:

http://www.mdgx.com/web.htm#98SE

ME:

http://www.mdgx.com/web.htm#WME

95 FE (First Edition) + OSR1:

http://www.mdgx.com/web.htm#WIN

95 OSR2:

http://www.mdgx.com/web.htm#OSR2

* Essential System Add-Ons + Tools:

http://www.mdgx.com/add.htm

DirectX Fixes, Updates + Tools:

http://www.mdgx.com/dx.htm

Internet Explorer Fixes + Updates:

http://www.mdgx.com/ietoy.htm

Windows Media Player Fixes + Updates:

http://www.mdgx.com/wmp.htm

Drivers + Tools:

http://www.mdgx.com/drv.htm

* Security, Firewalls, Anti-Spyware + Anti-Virus tools [free(ware)]:

Security:

http://www.mdgx.com/modem.htm#TS

Firewalls:

http://www.mdgx.com/fw.htm#FWL

Anti-Spyware:

http://www.mdgx.com/fw.htm#ASP

Anti-Virus:

http://www.mdgx.com/vir.htm

* Tips, secrets, guides + troubleshooting:

All Windows OSes:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip.htm

98, 98 SP1 + 98 SE:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip98.htm

ME:

http://www.mdgx.com/wme.htm

Registry:

http://www.mdgx.com/reg.htm

W95-11D.EXE:

http://www.mdgx.com/95.htm

MSDOS.SYS:

http://www.mdgx.com/msdos.htm

SYSTEM.INI:

http://www.mdgx.com/lastweek.htm#SYSINI

DOS:

http://www.mdgx.com/secrets.htm

Easter Eggs:

http://www.mdgx.com/egg.htm

* Free(ware) software:

95/98/ME + NT4/2000/XP/2003:

http://www.mdgx.com/toy.htm

Diagnostic, Testing + Benchmarking:

http://www.mdgx.com/speed.htm

Backup, Recovery + Hard Disk:

http://www.mdgx.com/secrets.htm#FDPT

CD + DVD:

http://www.mdgx.com/drv.htm#CDR

Video + Audio:

http://www.mdgx.com/drv.htm#DRV

http://www.mdgx.com/toy.htm#MED

Internet:

http://www.mdgx.com/toy.htm#WEB

DOS:

http://www.mdgx.com/dos.htm

* Other related web sites + forums:

98/ME web sites:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip98.htm#98L

95/98/ME forums:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip98.htm#98F

Enjoy.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/478640-windows-98-me-still-alive-campaign/
Share on other sites

These people AREN'T asking for support from Microsoft:

Enthusiast power users, programmers and IT specialists provide *free* support in their spare time at various web sites, forums, blogs etc.

There's a lot of support on the web for almost all issues.

you wont get my support, i personally believe this should have been done a long time ago

I agree with this . . Xp is already 5 years old . . . and it can run on nearly any computer configuration. . . if people haven't adopted this standard, then sorry . . but a line must be drawn.

So guys just let it die already and move on

i've had a guy call me (i do tech support :x) with a pentium 4 3.4ghz and 1.5gb ram running Win98 because he didnt want to fork over the money for an OEM copy of XP and he was wondering why his system wasnt as fast as he was expecting lol (he built the computer himself.....prolly used some tape to make sure everything is staying together lol)

I agree with this . . Xp is already 5 years old . . . and it can run on nearly any computer configuration. . . if people haven't adopted this standard, then sorry . . but a line must be drawn.

So guys just let it die already and move on

Please consider that some operatings systems are still supported by Microsoft that came before Windows ME.

And that Windows 98 +ME are still used by 70 Million users.

just wondering, how many people have you got to surport you so far?

the office count, not guess or fake number .

I agree with cooljerk_dv. just let it die and move on. just use your windows 98 system for music, or something . why waste time. microsoft wont listen to you. it was orgnaly gona end in 2003 but extended it till 2006.

I agree too, just let it die already. I am personally glad I wasn't using 98 anymore when I switched over to XP Home, then XP Pro in 2004-2005.

those who say win98 is for dinosaurs and so on.. mind your own onions! (er, probably not something usually said in english? :D)

I used win98SE till one year ago and it had some advantages (on my XP2400+, which had 768MB RAM at the time). much faster boot time (a few seconds), instant shutdown, near perfect DOS support (native speed, sound and working IPX networking. unmatched by DOSbox, where anything more demanding than doom is unplayable). exit windows to pure DOS mode, and you can flash BIOS and firmware without even technically rebooting.

and I could do anything (gaming, browsing, audio, video, etc.). I played doom3 (not for long as it was boring, but I'm playing it again now) and could run the hl2 demo.

immune to the worms that striked windoze NT. it even can have some holes but lack the infection vector (WMF hole). don't use IE and don't execute viruses in your mail, and the OS is secure.

Biggest issue I had was the limitation to 64K GDI resources, from the 16bit days. it's a problem with a few apps that leak such resources such as old phoenix/firebird versions (but that got fixed later, and you could prevent it with a setting in about:config), and steam.

now I wouldn't go back from NT 5.x (better kernel, task manager, some NT only things installed, and comparable UI experience once you've spent time learning to disable the crap). but still lacking the easy and excellent DOS compatibility. (sucks to have great old games collecting dust)

I understand that it might be faster, but if you go back to dos i bet thats even faster!

Please keep in mind that Windows 9x [95/98/ME] based OSes are installed on over 70 million computers, out of which 50 million are running Windows 98, 98 SE or ME.

Am I the only one that can't get their head round this sentence? :s

Maybe i'm just tired!

I understand that it might be faster, but if you go back to dos i bet thats even faster!

Am I the only one that can't get their head round this sentence? :s

Maybe i'm just tired!

lol no it does not make sense. so 20 million pc's have windows 98/me installed. there just not working lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!