What is it with home.live.com?


Recommended Posts

Okey... I'm pretty fed up with the ugly and NOT useful design of the live services. What is it with the live and the design? Is the live team from another planet or something? I just saw the new home.live.com page and man how ugly. A huge area on top with bad weather graphics and the date in the largest font avaiable :( Take a look at the windows button and how guly the graphics are. And what are you supposed to do with the home.live.com page? Is NOT useful at all! Take a look at the iGoogle page instead. Has everything AND the great looks! home.live.com lacks the news and stuff so are we supposed to switch beween the live.com page and the home.live.com page??? By the way, the live.com personalised page is so awful and ugly to use that someone should loose their job! Come on MS. Windows Vista looks so stunning beautiful so why can't the live services look good as well? I really want to only use MS products, but i can't. Still using iGoogle.

What is it with live services? Is it coded by aliens or something? It's not typically MS style :(

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/580431-what-is-it-with-homelivecom/
Share on other sites

Okey... I'm pretty fed up with the ugly and NOT useful design of the live services. What is it with the live and the design? Is the live team from another planet or something? I just saw the new home.live.com page and man how ugly. A huge area on top with bad weather graphics and the date in the largest font avaiable :( Take a look at the windows button and how guly the graphics are. And what are you supposed to do with the home.live.com page? Is NOT useful at all! Take a look at the iGoogle page instead. Has everything AND the great looks! home.live.com lacks the news and stuff so are we supposed to switch beween the live.com page and the home.live.com page??? By the way, the live.com personalised page is so awful and ugly to use that someone should loose their job! Come on MS. Windows Vista looks so stunning beautiful so why can't the live services look good as well? I really want to only use MS products, but i can't. Still using iGoogle.

What is it with live services? Is it coded by aliens or something? It's not typically MS style :(

If you actually cared about MS's services, used your eyes and your brain, AND did your research, you would realise that http://home.live.com is actually in BETA stage (meaning it has not yet been released!) and is not complete!!

There WILL be slight changes to the user interface (the user interface is what you refer to as the "design") and there will probably also be the inclusion of feeds (what you call the "news and stuff"). Gadgets and pages will also more than likely be implemented.

http://www.live.com (Live.com) will be replaced by http://home.live.com (Windows Live Home). Again, you would have known this if you had read articles on the Internet!!

^^^ All this means that when the final version of Windows Live Home is released, it will be much better than Live.com in both looks and functionality.

How can you say iGoogle is better when the UI of iGoogle is ugly and bland!?!?! The new Windows Live Wave 2 UI is absolutely brilliant, modern and professional in my opinion! As are the graphics they use for the weather feature on Windows Live Home.

Did you happen to notice that the colour of the Windows Live Home BETA UI changes with the time of day (e.g. becomes darker when it is night)?? If you didn't notice it, check it out and then come back and tell me that it is poorly coded by aliens from another planet!!!!

Bloody n00bs!!

If you actually cared about MS's services, used your eyes and your braAND did your research, you would realise that http://home.live.com is actually in BETA stage (meaning it has not yet been released!) and is not complete!!

ThWILL be slight changes to the user interface (the user interface is what you refer to as the "design") and there will probably also be the inclusion of feeds (what you call the "news and stuff"). Gadgets and pages will also more than likely be implemented.

http://www.live.com (Live.com) will be replaced by http://home.live.com (Windows Live Home). Again, you would have known this if you had read articles on the Internet!!

^^^ All this means that when the final version of Windows Live Home is released, it will be much better than Live.com in both looks and functionality.

How can you say iGoogle is better when the UI of iGoogle is ugly and bland!?!?! The new Windows Live Wave 2 UI is absolutely brilliant, modern and professional in my opinion! As are the graphics they use for the weather feature on Windows Live Home.

Did you happen to notice that the colour of the Windows Live Home BETA UI changes with the time of day (e.g. becomes darker when it is night)?? If you didn't notice it, check it out and then come back and tell me that it is poorly coded by aliens from another planet!!!!

Bloody n00bs!!

You been haveing a bad day or something? Lost your girlfriend? My god you are angry.

PLEASE read my post before you attack me with stupid stuff. Of cource i know it's beta. Like 80% of the live stuff. B E T A! But it doesent take years to make a design man. Coding and gadgets 'n stuff takes time. Make the windows button nice DO NOT take years. And please read my post and say something about the live.com page THAT IS NOT IN BETA! Ugly. Compare it to the iGoogle page.

Wow... the home.live.com page changes with the time of day. Big deal! iGoogle changes with the day too if your brain is big enough to see that. If that is proof of good coding then the live team have to be from another planet. Because it's not very hard to code different graphics at different times of the day. Man get a grip!

I would suggest you go to your doctor and perhaps get yourself some anti-depression pills or something or talk with your girlfriend. Good luck to :)u :)

EDIT: the word noob says somethnig about your age too. Perhaps you are not old enought to have a girlfriend. Poor guy.

@ <-cJr->: Unfortunately, the target audience of these sort of portal pages are for the technological proletariat. You can safely assume that none of them are going to do any research, and what really matters is the first impression.

You've probably noticed that the content box doesn't use up the entire screen. Why is that? Why does the live.com page (and the iGoogle page) take up the entire screen? Is that better?

Does the page being bland really matter? Personally, out of the three portal sites (home.live.com, live.com and iGoogle) I find the iGoogle "default" view the most useful. The Live.com look is probably the best (albeit probably too 'clean' a look; too much white), but the initial gadget frames that they provide are of little consequence.

Hmm OK, sorry, maybe I shouldn't have been so harsh to you nero78. I just hate it when people bash MS services when they're in beta and not complete.

I find the Live.com interface boring now, but I still think Live.com looks better than iGoogle. I don't know how anybody can like the iGoogle user interface tbh, it's too simple in my opinion.

I actually like the Windows Live Orb logo, how do you think it could be made better?? 'Cause I can't possibly see anything wrong with it (in my opinion).

Anyway, I'm just looking forward to the final release of Windows Live Home, when we are able to have feeds, gadgets and pages and when it replaces the already boring Live.com

@ <-cJr->: No probem! :) I have attached the start orb from the home.live.com page and the start orb from the vista. It's a small thing i know, but it just seems so lazy to use poor graphics on a so small thingy when they have a perfect one in the vista system. The other thing that they must have released this homepage to show off their new design. Why didn't they use a little bit more time to perfect the images and the graphics? It's not very hard work for a web designer...

post-202107-1187017314.png

post-202107-1187017321.png

The thing that lets the WL orb down is the poor quality save. The orb itself is cool. I think the reason it's not the Vista orb (white instead of dark blue) is to differentiate the products a bit :)

On a related note, the Windows Live Team just blogged this...

First of all, we hear you on the question of customization, but for now, Live.com is still the place for your customized gadgets and feeds, while Windows Live Home fills the need for an at-a-glance status page with quick links to all of your Windows Live services. Consider adding both as your Internet Explorer home page (in IE 7, you can have multiple tabs as your home page). We?re working on adding better navigation between these pages, and we will continue to explore whether or not merging their functionality is the right thing to do for all of our customers.

As far as the overlap between My MSN and Windows Live Home, we see these as different sites with different goals. MSN is a portal to content on the Internet, whereaWindows Live Home is a portal to online services like e-mail, social networking, and file sharing. That said, we?re working to create seamless connections between all these sites and services, so no matter which one you start with, you can easily find what you?re looking for. .

Thanks for all of your feedback so far! We?re building Windows Live with you in mind, so your comments will help shape how we serve you in the future. Please keep them coming!

One last thing, is home.live down for anybody else right now? I keep getting the message...

The Windows Live Network is unavailable from this site for one of the following reasons:

This site may be experiencing a problem

The site may not be a member of the Windows Live Network

You can:

You can sign in or sign up at other sites on the Windows Live Network, or try again later at this site.

You been haveing a bad day or something? Lost your girlfriend? My god you are angry.

PLEASE read my post before you attack me with stupid stuff. Of cource i know it's beta. Like 80% of the live stuff. B E T A! But it doesent take years to make a design man. Coding and gadgets 'n stuff takes time. Make the windows button nice DO NOT take years. And please read my post and say something about the live.com page THAT IS NOT IN BETA! Ugly. Compare it to the iGoogle page.

Wow... the home.live.com page changes with the time of day. Big deal! iGoogle changes with the day too if your brain is big enough to see that. If that is proof of good coding then the live team have to be from another planet. Because it's not very hard to code different graphics at different times of the day. Man get a grip!

I would suggest you go to your doctor and perhaps get yourself some anti-depression pills or something or talk with your girlfriend. Good luck to you :)

EDIT: the word noob says somethnig about your age too. Perhaps you are not old enought to have a girlfriend. Poor guy.

first off, please be a bit more respectfull. Theres no need to start a flame war. you say so your self you don't want to be atactked, but your doing the same thing. second, i do belive this came out a few days ago so thats why its worse them most of the betas that have been pout for months

The windows Live orb and the vista orb are diferent because they are DIFERENT PRODUCTS! Thats why msn had the butterfly and windows had the flag. I personly like that they have diferent orbs. Look at media center, it has a green orb.

@ <-cJr->: No probem! :) I have attached the start orb from the home.live.com page and the start orb from the vista. It's a small thing i know, but it just seems so lazy to use poor graphics on a so small thingy when they have a perfect one in the vista system. The other thing that they must have released this homepage to show off their new design. Why didn't they use a little bit more time to perfect the images and the graphics? It's not very hard work for a web designer...
The windows Live orb and the vista orb are diferent because they are DIFERENT PRODUCTS! Thats why msn had the butterfly and windows had the flag. I personly like that they have diferent orbs. Look at media center, it has a green orb.

To gonzoislost:

I have already appolgised to nero78, my disrespect was out of order, I know that now. I think what nero78 is saying is that the quality of the Windows Live Orb is rubbish compared to Windows Vista's. I don't think he is saying that the colour is different so its bad.

If you look at the current Windows Live Hotmail Orb and then compare it to Vista's it is the same quality and looks nice. Hoever, if you look at the Wave 2.0 Orb and compare it to the old one thequality is very poor.

I have only just noticed that myself, but look at the screenshot below to see:

test.jpg

Am I right nero78?? Is that what you mean? I never noticed it before but if that's what you mean you are completely right.

In relation to what the WL Team posted on thier blog:

I am not happy! What is the point in having both Live.com and WL Home?? They should incorporate feeds, gadgets and pages into WL Home (just like the screenshot last week showed) - that would be much better!!

  • 4 weeks later...

I totally understand Nero78. The overall design seems generic and hardly innovative. I can tell you why Live won't fly -- it's not cutting edge, it's not "young" or "sexy", it's not going to attract attention of the web's most saavy users: everyone under 30 years of age!

It makes no sense to create another web portal when MSN already has broad brand recognition. Alienating users is a recipe for failure when brand confusion between MSN and Live is rampant. Moreover, Windows is thought of as an OS, so adding the word Live to the mix only creates more misunderstanding.

As an instructional designer who deals mostly with e-learning for adults, I would never attempt to publish something that does not capture the eye or does not mesh well with already established services, namely competing services like MySpace, AOL, or Yahoo.

I don't doubt Microsoft has a team of extremely talented programmers, but these people clearly aren't "in" when it comes to UI innovation and tie-ins with existing services people already use. I play with mock-ups all the time with what MS ought to do with MSN and IE -- perhaps I'll share them some time.

Guys the Live Home project just started recently.

It's not a beta that has been cooking for years as Nero78 mentioned here.

It's brand new and is being built with input from the beta testers.

Does anyone even remember what Live looked like in the beginning?

It was called start.com and looked something like this

http://web.archive.org/web/20051226051415/.../www.start.com/

So as you can see things change.

Now the idea for the live.com vs. home.live.com is akin to the msn.com vs my.msn.com pages.

Something slightly more personalized for each person.

I'd also prefer to have the feeds and info on one page, rather than having feeds on one page and general at-a-glance info on another page. I'd like to have one page I can customize to show the feeds and info I want, and remove what I don't want. Just my opinion. However, I'm not passionate or angry or OMGWTF about any of it.

But WHY is MS building another portal brand separate from MSN? What is MSN lacking that requires MS to create a new online brand?

This was explained by several posts before didnt it? :

As far as the overlap between My MSN and Windows Live Home, we see these as different sites with different goals. MSN is a portal to content on the Internet, whereas Windows Live Home is a portal to online services like e-mail, social networking, and file sharing.

If you've been following Windows Live, a distinguishment is made at its early announcements, that MSN will be more content-based, whereas Windows Live are more service-based.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!