[Boxing] Mayweather 'wants Hatton rematch'


Recommended Posts

Floyd Mayweather is considering a rematch with Ricky Hatton at Wembley Stadium next spring, according to the Manchester boxer's promotional team.

Hatton, who fights Mexico's Juan Lazcano at the City of Manchester Stadium on 24 May, was stopped in 10 rounds by Mayweather last December.

Richard Schaefer, head of Golden Boy promotions, said: "It's very likely that Floyd will come over next spring.

"Floyd and his manager Al Hayman are very serious about it."

Hatton believes referee Joe Cortez contributed to his only defeat in 44 professional contests in Las Vegas and is keen to face Mayweather again under different circumstances.

"I thought the referee was a little bit harsh, the warnings were only coming one way and I lost my cool a little bit," said the 29-year-old.

"But I don't want to be an old man sat with my pipe and slippers in years to come and be blaming it on the referee.

"So I'd like to have another crack at him with a referee on better form and then if Floyd was to beat me again I could say, 'now you know'."

Before a return fight can be sealed, Hatton must first come through his fight with Lazcano before a possible clash with IBF light-welterweight champion Paul Malignaggi at New York's Madison Square Garden in the autumn.

Malignaggi, a native New Yorker, defends his title for a second time against Lovemore N'dou on the undercard of Hatton-Lazcano.

Mayweather, meanwhile, must negotiate a rematch with Oscar de la Hoya on 20 September, as well as an appearance on WWE's Wrestlemania on 30 March.

Schaefer added: "While Floyd would have to get past Oscar first, he knows that Ricky has talked about the referee.

"He wants to show that he will repeat what happened the first time and fighting in front of 100,000 fans would be huge motivation for Floyd."

Hatton ruled out a clash with domestic rival and WBC light-welterweight champion Junior Witter, saying: "If Junior Witter was fighting in my backyard, I'd shut the curtains."

I would love to see a rematch!!!

Would love to see a rematch, hopefully this time hatton will shut him up !!!

Hopefully the referee will be good this time, Spring 2009 they are saying but it may not happen if Hoya beats him in September.

I'd love to see it as well. For anyone who doesn't follow boxing, if they were told Joe Cortez was considered the best in the business they'd be laughing their heads off at the prospect of other referees! Definately some very poor decisions by Cortez in that fight!

Who knows though, maybe Oscar will shut him up. He nearly got their the last time!

If I were Mayweather, I would want Hatton again. Easy payday and low risk defense of the title. Mayweather needs to fight Cotto to seal the deal. Even though I believe he would beat Cotto, thats the only fight left. Enough with these rematches on PPV, lets get some real matches.

BTW, Hatton is fighting Lazcano! Lazcano is washed up, if Hatton loses, it will be a huge black eye on his career. At the same time, wtf? putting him in with a tomato can.

If I were Mayweather, I would want Hatton again. Easy payday and low risk defense of the title. Mayweather needs to fight Cotto to seal the deal. Even though I believe he would beat Cotto, thats the only fight left. Enough with these rematches on PPV, lets get some real matches.

BTW, Hatton is fighting Lazcano! Lazcano is washed up, if Hatton loses, it will be a huge black eye on his career. At the same time, wtf? putting him in with a tomato can.

Cotto would be the perfect opponent but I think Mayweather is avoiding him.

You can't blame the ref for getting knocked out.

Anywho, I would love to see a Cotto/Mayweather match up for sure. Floyd was interviewed the other day on Jim Rome is Burning about fighting Cotto and it was apparent that Mayweather is only interested in the fight if he gets a big audience (read:payout), something he believes he can't get from a fighter like Cotto.

You can't blame the ref for getting knocked out.

That's true, but who knows the KO might never have happened if Cortez allowed Hatton to get a rhythm together. Everytime he tried to unload on Mayweather, the ref stepped in as if he was protecting him. The commentators were all over Cortez for that.

I really only remember the match being stopped once and that was for Hatton hitting Mayweather in the back of the head, which I never saw on the replay either. I really don't think it mattered if Hatton got into a rhythm, Mayweather was just landing his punches and was too quick for Hatton.

You can't blame the ref for getting knocked out.

Anywho, I would love to see a Cotto/Mayweather match up for sure. Floyd was interviewed the other day on Jim Rome is Burning about fighting Cotto and it was apparent that Mayweather is only interested in the fight if he gets a big audience (read:payout), something he believes he can't get from a fighter like Cotto.

Cotto is the latest Puerto Rican boxing hero, surely the money would be good. Wouldn't be nearly as good as fighting DLH but sometimes you need to think about your sport first. This is where boxing needs reform.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!