• 0

offline defragmentation & reg optimizers


Question

Hi. I was wondering if disk defragmenters like perfectdisk, diskeeper, etc.. defrags the registry hives. Do they defrag everything that PageDefrag does? Is NTREGOPT and RegCompact.NET the same? I see that both compact the registry. It seems like RegCompact.NET does more though.

RegCompact.NET solves the problem of registry fragmentation and large size by rewriting the registry hives into new files which are optimized and often much smaller. Your computer is restarted after the registry hives are compacted and during system startup the old, fragmented files are replaced with the newly generated and optimized ones

I do not think that is defraging the registry though. From what I have looked up the only thing that will defrag the registry is PageDefrag. Am I right? lol. I was looking for a program to do both defrag and compact the registry. Once I started looking some say disk defragmenters does defrage the registry hives and some say they dont so any help appreciated.

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Hi. I was wondering if disk defragmenters like perfectdisk, diskeeper, etc.. defrags the registry hives. Do they defrag everything that PageDefrag does? Is NTREGOPT and RegCompact.NET the same? I see that both compact the registry. It seems like RegCompact.NET does more though.

I do not think that is defraging the registry though. From what I have looked up the only thing that will defrag the registry is PageDefrag. Am I right? lol. I was looking for a program to do both defrag and compact the registry. Once I started looking some say disk defragmenters does defrage the registry hives and some say they dont so any help appreciated.

Microsoft's defrag APIs (which all defragmenters use) support defragmenting registry hives (ensuring the file file as it exists on the drive is in 1 piece). However, even though the defrag APIs support it, not all defragmenters take advantage of this ability. Most of the commercial defragmenters take advantage of this feature. Reg optimizers (in my opinion) cause way more problems that they cure. Why they may recover space on disk by compacting the registry, they do not actually specifically defragment the registry (ensure that the file on disk is in 1 piece).

- Greg/Raxco Software

Microsoft MVP - Windows File Systems

Disclaimer: I work for Raxco Software, the maker of PerfectDisk - a commercial defrag utility, as a systems engineer in the support department.

  • 0
Reg optimizers (in my opinion) cause way more problems that they cure. Why they may recover space on disk by compacting the registry, they do not actually specifically defragment the registry (ensure that the file on disk is in 1 piece).

- Greg/Raxco Software

Microsoft MVP - Windows File Systems

Disclaimer: I work for Raxco Software, the maker of PerfectDisk - a commercial defrag utility, as a systems engineer in the support department.

Hello GHayes - you & I have "collided online" before, & I read your statement about "Registry Optimizers" & them causing troubles... well, I guarantee thsi one does not:

http://www1.techpowerup.com/downloads/389/...02++_SR-7_.html

(or, if that link does not work, try this one)

http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/389/A...02++_SR-7_.html

SCREENSHOT:

http://www1.techpowerup.com/downloads/screenshots/389.jpg

389.jpg

I didn't make the mistake other registry cleaners do/did, & that is:

MOST of them tend to expose CLSIDS (class identifiers - a registry based entity) &/or TypeLibs (both registry AND disk based entities) as valid candidates for removal by end-users, who most likely do NOT know how they work...

In other words, blow the wrong one of those? Don't wonder WHY things in your OS &/or APPs stop working!

(Mine filters vs. those & you never get problems from it because of that).

APK

P.S.=> By the by, nice seeing you around again man... apk

  • 0

From Systernals:

PageDefrag uses advanced techniques to provide you what commercial defragmenters cannot: the ability for you to see how fragmented your paging files and Registry hives are, and to defragment them. In addition, it defragments event log files and Windows 2000/XP hibernation files (where system memory is saved when you hibernate a laptop).

From NTRegOpt:

NTREGOPT is not a Registry defrag, it removes empty space/slack in the registry & returns the bytes back to general use.

Note that the program does NOT change the contents of the registry in

any way, nor does it physically defrag the registry files on the drive

(as the PageDefrag program from SysInternals does). The optimization

done by NTREGOPT is simply compacting the registry hives to the

minimum size possible.

All-important:

  • Aplications like Free Registry Defrag, Auslogics Registry Defrag, RegCompact.NET - don't defrag paging files/Registry hives/hibernation files.
  • JkDefragGUI can do that: it use NTRegOpt, firstly, to compact and PageDefrag to defrag paging files/Registry hives/hibernation files.

I use JkDefragGUI: useful, excellent and... freeware....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      212
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!