[Review] 24 inch iMac 2.8ghz


Recommended Posts

imac1.jpg

Click for larger images...

imac2_tn.jpg imac3_tn.jpg imac4_tn.jpg

As many of you know the iMac line was refreshed on Monday, April 28. For about 6 months I had been wanting to purchase a new computer, but I kept holding off for some reason. When I heard the rumors about the iMac update, I made up my mind that I would finally purchase one.

By the way, this is not my first Apple computer. I have had a 14? (1.33ghz) iBook for years now. I knew what to expect in terms of the initial setup of the iMac based off of my previous experience with Apple products. And I also knew my way around OSX pretty well.

I ordered the iMac the day it was updated. I don't game on my computer anymore (I have a 360, Wii, and PS3) so I figured I would go with the lower end of the 24? models. I selected the free shipping so I wasn't expecting to receive the iMac for about a week, but to my surprise it was delivered to my house on Wednesday, April 30...not even 2 full days after I placed my order. I was pretty happy with that to say the least.

My initial thought when I saw the box was, wow that's going to be huge. And believe me, I was right with my initial assessment.

I figured a 24? monitor wouldn't seem much different from the 20? monitor I was used to using with my Dell computer. I was completely wrong. The screen on the 24? iMac is totally amazing. I have never seen a display with a brighter screen. Even my 32? Samsung LCD television looks pale in comparison to the screen of this iMac. The glossy screen has a lot to do with that though. But anyways, the hardest thing to get used to, for me at least, is the resolution of the screen. 1920x1200 is amazing to work with. So much can be done on the screen at once. It is a great upgrade over the 1680x1050 resolution I am used to working with.

As for the computer itself, it came with a 2.8ghz Core 2 Duo and 2gb of 800mhz ram which I upgraded to 4gb (more on that later). This was a nice upgrade for me considering the pc I use at home is a 3.6ghz P4. My computer at work is a 1.83ghz Core 2 Duo though, so when I talk about responsiveness I will be comparing the iMac to that.

For me, this computer is extremely quick. I almost forgot how much quicker OSX in general is at launching applications. In terms of overall responsiveness there is no comparison between the iMac and my computer at work. Safari opens instantly...iTunes, even with a 10,000 song library opens in a fraction of the time that it does on my other computers. It takes a little under 2 seconds to be exact. Photoshop launches quicker than I have ever seen. I could go on and on, but I'm sure you get the general idea.

As for the ram upgrade, it really couldn't be any easier. It took maybe 2 minutes total to replace the ram with 2 new sticks. As far as I can tell, it is definitely best to max out the ram if you have the money to do so. At one point yesterday I saw I had a little over 800mb of ram free. I would have definitely noticed a performance hit if I had only been using 2gb.

This is my first time using Leopard for an extended period of time. A couple of my friends have iMacs (I talked them into buying them) so I have used it before, but not to the same extent as I have the past few days. I like the changes they have made for the most part. But just like anything else, there are a few default settings here and there that don't make much sense to me. For example the Mighty Mouse doesn't have right clicking enabled by default. Photo booth doesn't have the auto flip image setting enabled. Simple things like that can be slightly annoying to have to change, but like I said, it's impossible to please everyone completely. And the things I mentioned are very minor.

I ran xbench to include some figures in the review.

Please note though that I did not run the program right after a reboot, only because I haven't restarted the computer since I initially set it up and downloaded all the updates.

So here are the scores...

All tests enabled: 176.11

HDD test disabled: 228.84

Overall, I am very happy with my purchase. I hope this iMac lasts me a long time.

The only thing I dislike about the whole package is the Mighty Mouse. I just don't like it at all.

So here are some overall ratings.

iMac screen: 9.5/10

iMac performance: 9/10 (there is always something faster)

Overall look: 9/10 (people are amazed at this thing sitting on my desk)

Initial Leopard Impression: 9/10

Mighty Mouse: 6/10

Apple Keyboard: 8/10 (it takes some time to get used to)

Please ask any/all questions you may have about it and I will go into more detail.

Edited by StevoFC
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/634969-review-24-inch-imac-28ghz/
Share on other sites

Congratulations on your purchase, and great review. I have to agree with your criticism of the 'Mighty Mouse' - it is sub-optimal. I'd suggest using your PC mouse with the iMac.

/me pats his Logitech MX 1000

iMac is a really great all in one computer, I have one myself a 20" version from 07aug update (bought it 3 months ago) and can't be more pleased about it.

BTW what's your Power supply 1 temp in iStat (taken after couple of hours of general usage please)? Mine seems to be idling at 75C at general usage times and tops at 83C when really maxing out the computer.

iMac is a really great all in one computer, I have one myself a 20" version from 07aug update (bought it 3 months ago) and can't be more pleased about it.

BTW what's your Power supply 1 temp in iStat (taken after couple of hours of general usage please)? Mine seems to be idling at 75C at general usage times and tops at 83C when really maxing out the computer.

power supply is 60C.

it fluctuates a lot though.

edit: even if you just turn off the screen itself (control + shift + eject) it drops temps a ton.

for example i left my computer for about 25 minutes and the temp is now 45C for the power supply.

3 pics added to the first post...

Edited by StevoFC

I also agree on the Mighty mouse. It plain sucks.

There's some rumors that they will change the mouse soon, but I don't expect something much more ergonomical from them. Their mice were NEVER ergonomical.

Anyway, the only real problem I have with Apple is with mice. Otherwise, I also enjoy my 1st gen 24 inch imac :p

Welcome to the club lol

power supply is 60C.

it fluctuates a lot though.

edit: even if you just turn off the screen itself (control + shift + eject) it drops temps a ton.

for example i left my computer for about 25 minutes and the temp is now 45C for the power supply.

3 pics added to the first post...

Mine doesn't seem to fluctuate that much, it's stable around 75C pretty much all the time and turning the screen off hasn't ever changed the temp much. Currently the temp went from 75C to 73C and the hard drive was also turned to sleep for a 20min away time (it's a well ventilated room). Whatever the case I'm not really worried about it, but I just want to make sure my power supply isn't working abnormally compared to other iMac's with the same specs.

power supply is 60C.

it fluctuates a lot though.

edit: even if you just turn off the screen itself (control + shift + eject) it drops temps a ton.

for example i left my computer for about 25 minutes and the temp is now 45C for the power supply.

3 pics added to the first post...

Totally didn't know that Ctrl+Shift+^ turns off the screen. :| Thanks for that, and nice review. One question - does the glossy screen give off a lot of glare? I see the screen is facing away from the window, so does that help?

Totally didn't know that Ctrl+Shift+^ turns off the screen. :| Thanks for that, and nice review. One question - does the glossy screen give off a lot of glare? I see the screen is facing away from the window, so does that help?

When you sit directly in front of the screen it's not bad at all. Depending on your lighting and windows though there will be glare when looking at the screen from an angle. I have 2 windows in my room, one to the left also and sometimes it shines in but hasn't bothered me.

I forgot to point out that I have the brightness of the screen on notch 6 of 16 right now. It's crazy how bright it is. Sometimes I turn it up higher but after extended periods it actually bothers my eyes because it is so bright.

One question - does the glossy screen give off a lot of glare? I see the screen is facing away from the window, so does that help?

Yes, it does. I've got a 20" iMac with the glass front, and it reflects everything like a mirror. It's at the end of my bed, so when I read books at night with the light, I have to tilt the screen away so it doesnt reflect in my face. Can be a bit off-putting but the picture is definately better imo.

I own a 17" iMac as well, and I can say without a doubt that the 20" is far superior than the 17" (Screen-wise at least!)

When you sit directly in front of the screen it's not bad at all. Depending on your lighting and windows though there will be glare when looking at the screen from an angle. I have 2 windows in my room, one to the left also and sometimes it shines in but hasn't bothered me.

I forgot to point out that I have the brightness of the screen on notch 6 of 16 right now. It's crazy how bright it is. Sometimes I turn it up higher but after extended periods it actually bothers my eyes because it is so bright.

That's what I thought - it depends on on the lighting conditions since Raa's iMac can double as a mirror. :p

Yes, it does. I've got a 20" iMac with the glass front, and it reflects everything like a mirror. It's at the end of my bed, so when I read books at night with the light, I have to tilt the screen away so it doesnt reflect in my face. Can be a bit off-putting but the picture is definately better imo.

I own a 17" iMac as well, and I can say without a doubt that the 20" is far superior than the 17" (Screen-wise at least!)

Well it's good to know that the screen is better. I just wish Apple would have a matte option.

My friend just got his a few days ago also (he ordered it as soon as he got word of it, and it came here a couple of days later - and we're in Hawaii).

As a Windows user for more than 10 years, Apple computers are so freakin cool!

Now all you have to do is get one yourself. :cool:

For example the Mighty Mouse doesn't have right clicking enabled by default. Photo booth doesn't have the auto flip image setting enabled. Simple things like that can be slightly annoying to have to change, but like I said, it's impossible to please everyone completely. And the things I mentioned are very minor.

The Mighty Mouse is designed so that long time Mac users don't get confused by the right click, and can use it how it's always been. OS X is designed to not really need right click to keep things simple.

I think in Tiger auto flip was default, I remember using it and thinking it would irritate me a lot.

For me, I thought it was strange how tapping the trackpad didn't click by default, but when you watch an old/inexperienced person using a laptop and making lots of accidental clicks this way, it does make sense.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!