Windows Server 2003 taking over contract/maintenance questions


Recommended Posts

Hi chaps

I am a very advanced and experienced user of all Windows OS's including trouble shooting and fixing Windows since 3.1 and before that DOS.

I build PC's for customers and trouble shoot hardware as well, there is pretty much nothing I can't fix when it comes to PC's basically :)

I currently do this for a living and have been self employed for the last 3-4 years mainly with residential and small business's with 5-10 employees.

Now during my 15 years experience I have never really used or come into contact with Windows Server, I have always meant to get more experience with it but never really had the time.

I have now installed it on a spare machine I have here and had a little play and I feel I could pick it up very quickly but am aware that it's a big OS and there is lots to learn!

I have been asked to support a fairly big network of 40ish PC's running Windows XP and there is two Servers running Windows Server 2003 (both DC's as far as I can tell) The current guy has left the company in the lurch and is not responding to calls and has basically vanished.

I visited today to do a little audit and everything looks in order and there is no major problems as far as the customer knows either although there are some small problems occurring, the main server has 35'ish clients connecting and the current roles in Mange my Server are:

File Server

Print Server

Application Server

Domain Controller

DNS Server

DHCP Server

WINS Server

The customer is a relation to me and would really like me to take it over as they have had bad experiences in the past, my question is do you think I can pick up what I need to as I go along or by buying a Windows Server 2003 bible (if there is such a thing) or from help on here and other forums?

I there some video tutorials around or a really good intensive course paid or free?

If I did decide to take the maintenance on do you think it would be best to start a fresh, wipe the server and set it up myself so I know what is going on and gain experience or leave it alone as it's working but with some one else's possible mess?

I know there are lots of questions here but any input would be greatly appreciated :)

Well my 1st question would be how can you tell that there's a possible mess left over?

You say there's small problems occuring from your audit? Such as what?

There's loads of book out there I suppose. But not everything will be documented on one book.

You could maybe start with "Windows Server 2003 for Dummies" then move on to "Mastering Windows Server 2003"

Hi, I had a look through the book they write problems down in and there seems to be things like can't print from a certain machine , a user can't log on, system seems slow, cant access files they needs to etc. A far as a mess goes I'm really going on what the customer is telling me, but it seems that he wasn't exactly good at his job, very lax in returning calls, billing loads of hours for "remote work" not fixing or doing things that they asked etc...

Sounds like a really nice basic network to me. Because its so basic it is proberbly a nice network to be familiourising yourself with Windows domains and servers.

Networks with no problems are always good money makers. My goal for any network is to make it run sound then make sure I can remote access the site. Unless their internet breaks or there's a hardware issue I can remotely manage all customers. More often than not customers moan that you don't come on-site much for the price they pay for your support. Well... isn't that a good thing?

My first point of call would be to change the administrator password and look for any signs of remote access on the router. You don't want the previous guy coming back in and looking around the network. Why do companies employ someone full time to manage 40 users whom only use file and print sharing? That guy must have had some long boring days.

I wouldn't wipe and start over unless the network just didn't work at all. Rebuilding a domain and then configuring all usernames and 40 workstations would be a long long process. Because this network sounds so simple there isn't much to go wrong.

You need to gather up any information the previous guy had before. A list of passwords etc would be handy (Directory Restore Password would be nice to have. If you don't have this you should look at changing it while the servers are still functional). It depends on the previous guy though, if he's what I come across everyday then it will all be in his head (Sigh). As long as you have the administrator password or at least an account with domain admin privileges you can figure everything out.

You say you have managed small businesses before yet never come across Windows Servers. I can't think of one small company I have done work for that doesn't have a Windows Server on-site somewhere. What types of networks have these small businesses had?

I have the Mastering Windows 2003 Server book and read it right through. I highly recommend the book, I got mine cheap as a second hand copy on Amazon. It has a lot of good info inside it but like any book it won't tell you how to fix something when it doesn't work :)

Most people here at Neowin are always willing to help. Forums and/or Google are always a great source for information.

*Edit*

Ugh I started writting this before you replied to the guy above. I can see now that he was an external contact of the company. The problems you mention don't seem like big problems to me. You need to kick the customer for more information in regards to the login issues. Windows won't simply say "Not letting you logon". Error messages are needed to find the source of the problem. Can't access certain files just sounds like file permissions are preventing them. Again need error message. Slow systems need to be seen. Slow to someone can be fine to others. If it is slow then normally its just a PC that needs replacing or reloading. Then again it could always be EndPoint Protection (spit) doing it's thang.

Edited by ]SK[

I agree with SK, you should be fine but you need to change every administrator password to anything, ASAP, and it would be a very good idea to force every user to change their password as well because chances are the old guy will have one of them. It's also a good excuse to enforce strong passwords on them.

Thanks for the comments SK, sounds like a good idea to change every password on the server admin wise and the same with the router, defiantly don't want him snooping around or sabotaging anything.

The customers I have at the moment have been using one power PC in their network as the File Server, using POP3 with Outlook, auto backing up to an external hard disk. This works well for them and is cheap which is what they wanted at the time, thinking about the 3 company's I manage, they are all florishing business's now and could probably afford/need a Server but how do you persuade/convince a business to buy a server and the associated software when they won't notice any difference? (anyway that is another question)

In relation to your question Marshalus, the users all logon with the same username and no password at the moment, it's a learning center so they all login with group1, group2, group3 etc I was told while I was there that not much get saved by the users but the teachers have access to quite a lot of files stored on the server and the various groups open the shared files.

It's worth mentioning the second Server is serving 5-6 users (the teachers) 1 of which has outlook connecting to exchange on that server. I didn't get a proper look at this server as it had no screen and no one knew the password for it anyway.

The customers I have at the moment have been using one power PC in their network as the File Server, using POP3 with Outlook, auto backing up to an external hard disk. This works well for them and is cheap which is what they wanted at the time, thinking about the 3 company's I manage, they are all florishing business's now and could probably afford/need a Server but how do you persuade/convince a business to buy a server and the associated software when they won't notice any difference? (anyway that is another question)

What's your meaning of a 'power PC'? If the company had a fire where could their non-fried data be found? If they are using POP3 I guess their PST/OST's for outlook are stored on the local machine or have they been redirected to the 'power PC'? Exchange does alot more than just emails. Since all outlook data for Exchange is held on the server you can backup the companies exchange information easily. This also allows you to offer Outlook Web Access. Outlook isn't that useful when used for just mail. Having Exchange unlocks all of its features. Having a domain is an easy and secure way of making sure users are working and not able to do things they shouldn't.

It's worth mentioning the second Server is serving 5-6 users (the teachers) 1 of which has outlook connecting to exchange on that server. I didn't get a proper look at this server as it had no screen and no one knew the password for it anyway.

Surly if you have the admin user and password for the first server then you have the details you need to login to the exchange server. Most of my servers don't have monitors on them. Remote Desktop was a most welcome addition to Windows XP/2003.

Edited by ]SK[

What's your meaning of a 'power PC'? If the company had a fire where could their non-fried data be found? If they are using POP3 I guess their PST/OST's for outlook are stored on the local machine or have they been redirected to the 'power PC'? Exchange does alot more than just emails. Since all outlook data for Exchange is held on the server you can backup the companies exchange information easily. This also allows you to offer Outlook Web Access. Outlook isn't that useful when used for just mail. Having Exchange unlocks all of its features. Having a domain is an easy and secure way of making sure users are working and not able to do things they shouldn't.

A power PC meaning a Core2Duo with 4GB and 500GB of hard disk, the outlook data files are backed up every night from the local machines to backup drive, that then replicates to another drive which they take away incase of fire.

They already have Outlook web access with the ISP.

So you can see why it would be hard to convince they need a server.

Surly if you have the admin user and password for the first server then you have the details you need to login to the exchange server. Most of my servers don't have monitors on them. Remote Desktop was a most welcome addition to Windows XP/2003.

It wasn't the same password as the main server.

Going a little bit off track now any way.

So you guys think I should be ok with a little help from books and the internet?

Seems a really simple network to me as well, just 35-40 clients running basic software and printing hardly saving anything and not using Outlook/E-mails, the only thing that concerns me slightly is the other server running exchange but this appears to be running and working fine so I guess I will learn as I go with that...

I'll get a list of what is currently wrong today and post here if it's not too big.

See if the second server with Exchange is setup on the same Active Directory domain, if so the Admin password will be the same on all servers and all workstations on the domain.

GE

Not being able to access the server would be a major concern for me. I like to find out as much as I can about a network. That way when things go wrong you will have a better understanding for when things go wrong... and trust me things do go wrong from time to time.

I would say create your own test network using MS Virtual PC or alike. Familiarise yourself with Exchange because Exchange is quite a complicated program.

In relation to your question Marshalus, the users all logon with the same username and no password at the moment, it's a learning center so they all login with group1, group2, group3 etc I was told while I was there that not much get saved by the users but the teachers have access to quite a lot of files stored on the server and the various groups open the shared files.

Then change the username and passwords they share. If they are sharing them you can be assured that that guy has access.

You probably also want to poke around in AD Users and make sure he didn't leave any backdoors for himself.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!