Recommended Posts

Would a moderator be able to top this subject, please?

Over the last few days, there has been a significant amount of members here who were having problems porting their boot screens to SP2. I happened to be experimenting with the SP2 boot screen lately and fortunately, I am pleased to mention that I have been able to successfully create a boot screen that works in SP2 that will be submitted onto ThemeXP later today. The purpose of this post is to state the problem and the workarounds.

Problem: Say you are using a program such as BootEditor. It allows you to compile most of the resources into the boot screen, move the progress bar to the desired location, and embed the colour palette. However, Service Pack 2 for Windows XP is released and when the boot screen is loaded after being compiled, the colours are screwed up.

Cause: When I previewed a SP2 boot screen compiled in BootEditor, I took a snapshot of the compiled boot screen as it loaded up on startup and compared it to the original. I noted that the first two colours have been bumped off (translated to black) and therefore, the rest of the palette has been shifted two spots towards the left. Yesterday, I checked the default NTOSKRNL.EXE file and the compiled NTOSKRNL.EXE file in UltraEdit and I noted that Microsoft programmed the boot screen palette does not start at the beginning of line 00075690h as BootEditor was programmed to read, but rather at the ninth hex couplet of line 00075680h (A line consists of 16 hex couplets). So, we understand now that BootEditor is only programmed to read the palette codes starting at the first hex couplet of a line.

Solution: Once you have made the graphics, converted them to indexes, and transferred the graphics to BootEditor to compile it for SP2; you will need a hex editor like UltraEdit. You load up the hex editor to open the SP2 boot screen file and look for the line that says 00075680h on the left. Go to the ninth hex couplet and start typing everything in order listed from lines 00075690h to 000756c0h. When you get to the last eight hex couplets of line 000756c0h after typing the 64 hex couplets, type the following:

01 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF

Save the changes and you are ready to test the boot screen.

If you decide to not use BootEditor to insert the images, note that when you load up the hex editor to type in the palette, the sequence is Blue Hex Value, Green Hex Value, Red Hex Value, 00 and NOT Red HV, Green HV, Blue HV, 00. And yes, the palette is typed in order from index 0 to 15.

Hope this helps for you all and I'll be doing some deeper boot screen hacking, which some of the info may interest you in the future.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/202250-boot-screens-in-xp-sp2/
Share on other sites

...sooooo... does anyone have a .pal palette that i can load into paint shop to do my editing with? the old/sp1 ones are obviously non-working and i have no clue how to put all this information together to make a new one.

give me a laser or a router and i'm fine - tell me to correct the colors on an image in photoshop and my brain freaks out :blush:

I signed up on this site to say thanks Webgraph for the info. Now I am able to make all my screens compat w/ the new sp 2 kernel. Its gonna take a few moew moments to complete a screen w/ this kernel but untill a easier way comes along, we will have to live w/ it.

Double H

You have my gratitude, Double H, and welcome to Neowin. ;)

...sooooo... does anyone have a .pal palette that i can load into paint shop to do my editing with? the old/sp1 ones are obviously non-working and i have no clue how to put all this information together to make a new one.

give me a laser or a router and i'm fine - tell me to correct the colors on an image in photoshop and my brain freaks out :blush:

I used the same palette that I had for sp0 & sp1 & its working fine frm here.

Double H

Ok, I tried this and the colors changed on the boot screen I made. However, they still aren't the proper colors. I'm not sure if I made any mistakes or not seeing as I rarely have the opportunity to use a hex editor, but I did it twice and the results were the same. Is there any other way possible to fix this? Thanks in advance for any help.

Ok, I tried this and the colors changed on the boot screen I made. However, they still aren't the proper colors. I'm not sure if I made any mistakes or not seeing as I rarely have the opportunity to use a hex editor, but I did it twice and the results were the same. Is there any other way possible to fix this? Thanks in advance for any help.

As I know of, the hex editor is the only way of doing this until BootEditor releases an update that will accomodate SP2 boot screens. Perhaps you may be able to post the boot screen bitmap and a picture of what it's turning out to be here (or links to the images)?

Ok, seems I got it working. Chances are I just goofed up the first couple times.

Something I noticed is that up in the left top corner there is this little black box, I don't suppose you know what that is from, or how to get rid of it?

Edited by X PsychoTron X

Humm ok, I seem to have stumbled upon another problem. You see I just built this new computer for my girlfriend who is going of to college in sep, and I wanted to make something really unique for her. So I decided I would go ahead and just tweak everything out. New login & Password images, boot screen ect with her school seal, colors and her name. So while doing all of this I did it all on my computer which is running xp pro, same as hers, as well as the same exact version of SP2. I got everything running just great on my computer and once I did I transferred it all over to hers and set it up. But for some reason it wouldn?t boot with the file I had made.

So I decided to just run through all the steps on her computer and I found out something rather strange. I have no idea why the kernel file would be any different but in the location you give everything is completely different from the one I made on my computer. I went ahead and changed it anyways, and it would boot however the colors are all still messed up.

hex.jpg

I?m not quite sure what to make of this, but I?ll post a link to the new kernel I made and if you want you can poke around. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

PS. I don?t know if this would have any relevance to the type of kernel, but I use a CRT monitor and her computer uses an LCD.

##NTOSKRNL DOWNLOAD##

Why don't you PM me a link to the image you're trying to create and the palette you intended to use?

Humm well that is the thing. I got it working fine on my computer using your guide, however on hers there seems to be a different ntoskrnl file because the color information doesn't apear to be where you said it was. Just take a look at the current ntoskrnl file download I've provided. Chances are if you were to put it together for me I would run into the same probelm I had using the one I created on my computer.

Well, bootskin seems alright. Not quite as good as a real windows boot image. Kind of flickers into view, also I don't like the way the progress meter animates. However, I'm just going to tinker around with it and change a few things, maybe I can come up with something that will better suit the way bootskin works.

X PsychoTron X, as soon as I downloaded your kernal frm here & opened it up in Boot Editor, I seen all your probs, & it all starts w/ the palette that your trying to use.

First off the black square you are getting in the top left corner is the first color (COLOR 0) of your pallette that your using is black. Heres a def of color 0-> Color No. 0 (first color) is the also the color for a stupid small rectangle with a size of 23x10 pixels in the left upper corner (I think this area will be used in the memory to show the running progress bar), a 8 pixels broad border around the whole boot screen and the background color for the progress bar.

Now since the background of the top left corner of your screen is purple, change the first color in your palette to the exact same purple. Also I would suggest to change the background in your Progess bar, where you have it black now, to the purple also. For example, look @ this screen I made, thats avail on Themexp.org

http://www.themexp.org/preview.php?mid=623...name=Beauty.zip

Now for this example My bg is white & see how I made the background for the progress bar white also, cant see her leg through the p bar area.

Now on the color palette the second color (Color 1) has to be BLACK (0,0,0). Nothing less then black has to go here. Def of color 1-> Color No. 1 (second color) is always black (also if you give another color than black, the color will be not considered and this areas will displayed black)

Fix these 2 errors in your editing software, being Photoshop, Paint Shop Pro or whatever, on the main bitmap, dont forget to apply that FIXED palette to your progress bar also. Then open BootEditor & apply those images to the ntoskrnl file in there. Then take that kernal into Ultra Edit, & you will be able to fix that bootscreen kernal in UE w/out a prob.

Double H

Humm ok, I seem to have stumbled upon another problem. You see I just built this new computer for my girlfriend who is going of to college in sep, and I wanted to make something really unique for her. So I decided I would go ahead and just tweak everything out. New login & Password images, boot screen ect with her school seal, colors and her name. So while doing all of this I did it all on my computer which is running xp pro, same as hers, as well as the same exact version of SP2. I got everything running just great on my computer and once I did I transferred it all over to hers and set it up. But for some reason it wouldn?t boot with the file I had made.

So I decided to just run through all the steps on her computer and I found out something rather strange. I have no idea why the kernel file would be any different but in the location you give everything is completely different from the one I made on my computer. I went ahead and changed it anyways, and it would boot however the colors are all still messed up.

http://www.information21.com/upload/psycho-tron/hex.jpg

I?m not quite sure what to make of this, but I?ll post a link to the new kernel I made and if you want you can poke around. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

PS. I don?t know if this would have any relevance to the type of kernel, but I use a CRT monitor and her computer uses an LCD.

##NTOSKRNL DOWNLOAD##

Does that computer use hyperthreading technology by chance? If so, it doesn't use the normal ntoskrnl.exe. During setup, if windows detects a dual processor/hyperthreading it renames ntkrnlmp.exe to ntoskrnl.exe and uses that as the kernel. The palette as well as progress bar postitions are in a different place.

The offset for the palette is: 79C08

First progress bar string: 3984C; 3B072; 3B08C (62 01 00 00); These three locations contain the vertical postitioning of the progress bar.

Second progress bar string: 398CA; 3B082 (6A 01 00 00) These two locations contains the vertial postitioning as well as the progress bar height.

Looking at a copy of ntkrnlmp.exe here looks like the screenshot you posted...

Ahh, thanks for the replies. Seems there is no email notification on this forum so I never know when to check back. You guys have shed a lot of light on things for me, thanks a ton. jrzycrim --> You're right, that computer does use HT. However I just ended up using boot skin on her computer and made her a boot screen with no progress bar because I don't like how the progress bar in boot skin animates. But everything you guys have told me should help in the future with my own computer so thanks a ton. :D

w00t!

The guy who makes boot editor hooked me up with a copy that supports service pack 2, it's not on his site yet and I don't think I should distribute it, but just wanted to let you guys know to expect it soon I guess. He changed the format around a little and now it only saves .zip files, but if you need .exe's what you do is set a test screen and just snag the new .exe out of the system 32 folder. I guess he did it to make file sizes smaller and to make it so everyone makes their own using their own kernel, which would mean if you shared the zip's I guess you would need his program to put everything back together.

That's good news. I figured there would be a new version released soon. I saw a couple of posts by UserXP the other day and he has a new version of his Loginui/boot randomizer.

---------

Some folk'll never eat a skunk but then again some folk'll,

like Cletus the slacked-jawed yokel. :laugh:

Edited by jrzycrim
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ooooh! Two editorial from Paul Hill on the same day! Is it my birthday or something? 😉 Okay, let's see if I get it right. SearXNG develops a meta-search engine app. Individuals install it on their relays. Users connect to these relays to have their own identity-stripping meta-search engine instead of relying on DuckDuckGo. And some of these volunteers have listed their SearXNG instances on SearX.space. That was a lot of wrap my head around. I hope I haven't missed anything.
    • You sound like some Ukrainians in Crimea before 2014: "I didn't vote for USSR disbanding - I want Ukraine to be part of Russia again" 🤣
    • Uninstalr 3.1 by Razvan Serea Introducing Uninstalr: Easy to use and very accurate software uninstaller for Windows. It can uninstall multiple apps at the same time and we think it’s pretty cool. Developed with expertise by Macecraft Software - the minds behind jv16 PowerTools. Key Features Batch uninstall many apps at the same time. Supports unattended uninstallation of apps. Supports monitoring of new software installations. Also detects portable apps and previously uninstalled software leftovers. Shows all the data added to your system by installed software on a file by file basis. Shows all the data it will remove before starting the uninstallation. Filter and search the list of installed software. According to our benchmark, Uninstalr is the most accurate software uninstaller by leaving the least amount of leftovers when uninstalling apps. Supports detection and uninstallation of Microsoft Store, Steam, Big Fish Game System, Chocolatey, NuGet and Ninite installed software. Supports Windows Dark Mode. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8 and 7. Comes with these translations builtin: Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Czech, Danish, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Turkish, Ukrainian and Vietnamese. Has a single executable file portable version and a normal setup version. Uninstalr is freeware, lightweight and easy to use. No bells and whistles, no nonsense. Uninstalr’s custom uninstallation engine has a dedicated support for the detection and uninstallation of 15 types of apps: Normal Windows apps Microsoft Store apps Portable apps Chocolatey apps Ninite apps PortableApps.com apps Steam games EA App games Epic Games Store games Riot platform games GOG Galaxy games WarGaming.net games Battle.net games itch.io games Big Fish platform games Uninstalr 3.1 changelog: Key Changes Uninstalr now starts and shows the list of installed apps faster after the initial scan has been completed, and with much smaller memory usage. Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps. Improvements New feature: Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. New feature: Uninstalr now highlights possible leftovers and apps from Russia and China. This can be disabled from the Settings. New feature: A new filter that allows you to show only software that is installed to other than the system drive. New feature: Users can now select to always do the deepest and the most accurate scan for installed apps, at the cost of the analysis taking a longer time. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps, such as added dedicated support for MiTeC, EZ Tools and SysInternals tools. Improved support for portable apps installed via Windows System Control Center (WSCC). NirSoft portable apps are now listed with "NirSoft" prefix for easier identification. Improved the speed of uninstalling apps. The main installed software listing search will now find "Xbox GameBar" if you search for "Game bar" and vice versa. The tooltip now displays more detailed information of the installed apps, such as its registry key and uninstaller path. The links in the About section now look more like clickable links. The main menu is now more clearly indicated in the main user interface. Microsoft Teams Meeting Add-in for Microsoft Office ships with some Windows 11 installations and is now considered a builtin Windows app and only listed if builtin Windows apps filter is enabled. Added a Help button to the main user interface that opens the help section of the website. Added an option not to close Uninstalr after uninstallation. If you open the Uninstalr website from the app, the website now receives the version number of your current Uninstalr version and warns you if you are using anything but the latest version. Improved the accuracy of the New Software Monitor. Improved confirmation messages for Steam and other platform related uninstalls. Improved the uninstallation performance of Steam games. Fixes: Known bug fixed: Some installed app names are capitalized incorrectly, such as "CCleaner Portable" is listed as "ccleaner portable". Known bug fixed: Some apps can be listed twice, for example, Smart Defrag can be listed once as Smart Defrag and then Smart Defrag Home. Known bug fixed: On the pre-uninstallation screen, the Scripts checkbox can be checked by default on Dark Mode but not on the normal mode. Known bug fixed: Perform Deep Analysis can be started only by clicking the button, not via the Right Click menu, main menu or F4 keyboard shortcut. Muse Hub could be incorrectly listed as Adobe Muse. SyncTrayzor was incorrectly detected as two unrelated software, SyncTrayzor and Syncthing. Smart Defrag was incorrectly listed twice as Smart Defrag 11 and Smart Defrag Home. It was possible to enter non-printable characters to the search input boxes of the main screen, and the path listing screen, which caused the UI to look funny. Changing the translation from Settings, especially many times in a row, caused the UI to distort. If you had multiple instances of portable apps on your system, such as the 64b and 32b versions of the same portable app, typically only one of them was detected, not both. In some very rare cases, Uninstalr UI could start with random characters in its search input boxes, which could make the UI look rather confusing. This was a rare issue, only reported by two users. The pre-uninstallation screen could display non-existing paths for example as the software's installation directory or main exe file. This was a cosmetic issue. New Software Monitor cannot detect the installation of Claude. Selecting all the found software made the UI look funny with the top panel covering everything else (because the names of all the selected software were listed there). Sometimes a Steam game could be listed a normal app instead of a Steam game. If the system restart after an uninstallation is delayed, e.g. because of Windows Updates being installed, this additional delay is incorrectly added to the time how long the uninstallation process took. This cosmetic bug could cause the program incorrectly report an uninstallation time longer than the actual uninstallation time. Uninstalling Minecraft could simply fail. The Only scan the system drive for installed apps setting does not fully work. If some apps are installed to a non system drive and this setting is enabled, the app could still be detected and listed on the main user interface. Changing any settings could also incorrectly alter the Only Scan The System Drive For Installed Apps setting. Microsoft OneDrive and Copilot are not always detected. If you enter something to the search filter field, then select the text and press the Delete key, this triggers the Uninstall button click even if your intent was to delete the text input. If you press the F5 key to refresh the screen during the uninstallation loading screen, the program will crash. If you enabled some setting, such as "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes", it could automatically be unchecked later. Uninstalr doesn't warn you if you try to remove Fortec antivirus. There should be a warning if user attempts to remove any antivirus or antimalware type program. Such programs should not be uninstalled using a third party uninstaller, as they are typically protected against automated uninstallation, for security reasons. With "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes" option checked from the Settings, Uninstalr could still display some installation size related elements in the UI which was confusing. The "Only scan the system drive" option moved under Improve Scan Speed from the General settings. If two software have the exact same name and version number, selecting both of them for uninstallation fails because only one is actually selected. Sorting the installed apps by size sometimes fails and the order is incorrect. The "Don't show which paths are currently analyzed" did not work correctly - some parts of the UI still show the currently analyzed path with this setting checked. The "Don't list software less than 10 MB" filter did not work correctly - some apps smaller than 10 MB could still be listed. Uninstalr could start very quickly and display an empty list of detected apps. Restarting the app usually fixed the issue and the list of installed apps was properly displayed. If you placed portable Uninstalr to a same folder with other portable apps, those were not detected because Uninstalr automatically added its installation folder to the ignore list. When trying to uninstall some specific software, Uninstalr could get stuck on the Searching for more data relating to the app phase. Uninstalr could sometimes do a silent uninstallation even if user had unchecked the Perform a silent uninstallation option. Known issues: Uninstalr can fail to run with an Out Of Memory error in systems that have a lot of installed apps. Using the New Software Monitor tool multiple times during one session can cause the program to get stuck on the Scanning stage. The "uninstallation completed" message box sometimes closes when the user moves the mouse cursor over the button before user clicks it. There is no feedback for the user after Fix Information feature has been used. The Right Click menu's Select by publisher option can display the number of apps per each publisher without correct vertical alignment. The default user interface might not display all of the found installed apps if you have over 600 installed apps. If you do, using the Screen Reader Compatible Interface solves the issue. Leftover apptype filter checkbox is shown in red font only in Dark Mode. Clicking the app's icon from the Windows Taskbar doesn't minimize/restore the app like other apps. The warning about an app that user wishes to uninstall being related to some other app user did not select can sometimes be inaccurate. If app's language is changed without restarting Uninstalr, the list of installed software might not automatically refresh. When software is being uninstalled, the UI can say it is processing paths unrelating to the uninstalled app. This is purely cosmetic and does not mean these paths are removed. Uninstalr might not properly detect and/or uninstall Steam games if they are installed to a drive different than Steam's default location in C:\. You might see "This action is only valid for products that are currently installed" error message from Windows Installer during uninstallation. This is a cosmetic issue. Download: Uninstalr 3.1 | 7.1 MB (Free, paid version available) Download: Uninstalr Setup 3.1 View: Uninstalr Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I always do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions relays before defining it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!