Why cant we make WindowBlind like themes ?


Recommended Posts

hi guys

I have been using nearly all themes created by users here ...

I ahve to say they are doing such a Beautiful job... but my question is ... Why arent we able to make themes which can compete with windowblinds... thier themes rock ??

where are we lagging ???

I hope this thread will clear up any doubts and can provide tips for theme creators to better thier themes to next level...

All the best guys ..

All your themes Rock !! no denial !!

Windowblinds uses it's own theme engine, and can style way more UI elements than you can with Msstyles. If you do full system patches (all sorts of dll's) you can do almost as much as WindowBlinds, but still in a way less convenient way.

so is there any theme here that does to extent windowblind does ... ??/

coz recently i saw a theme from them showing a dragon on top of start menu ... it was awesome...

Not as visual style. If you want to use WindowBlinds themes, buy the software.

WindowBlinds is far ahead of what you can do in a Msstyle. There is no way to get similar stuff without it.

Can you link to the theme?
http://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?ski...libid=1&c=1

The Dragon is actually animated...

Unfortunately or WB, all the talented themers with any sense of style and design, seem to like just making visual styles, while all the peopel with no design, color matching or style clue whatsoever make WB themes, usually way overdone with huge everythings.

YEah, WB themes have a few nuggets hidden here and there, but they're usually made by the few themes who do both VS and WB, and they know not to use the garish overdone WB Extras and other crap, and their themes are available just as good as simple visual styles.

I myself used to put up some amazing skins for msstyles and WindowBlinds back in the day, and I'm trying to be as modest as I can here. The problem is the sheer scope of completely designing a skin and replacing every little last element in Windows. Skinning just a control button for example, requires 5 or 6 images just to make a single element.

Skinning takes time, patience, and above all, creativity. Most people just don't have those requirements. I myself lost the first two a while back, it's just too time consuming and all the problems you run into just kills your motavation.

i find that most WB skin designers try too hard to use all the features of WB, most skins are big and clunky (look at that awful dragon skin that was posted :x)

I know what you are saying, but to be fair that skin was meant to be a tech demo just to show that animations are now possible so you have to cut it a little slack.

I know what you are saying, but to be fair that skin was meant to be a tech demo just to show that animations are now possible so you have to cut it a little slack.

I can understand that but unless things have changed (it's been a while since I looked at WB skins), the skins are really busy and it's hard to find nice simple and easy to use skins

i think the big euphoria is gone. i remember back in 2001 when xp came out, the next 2 years there came a lot of visual styles, many very impressive and nice. same with windowblinds.

i did some vs myself too, but basically, as some already said, its a lot of work and sometimes too much work :rolleyes:

WindowBlinds isn't actually as bad as it used to be (back in the days of Windows 98 where it became quite popular); it doesn't use as much memory and it allows you to conveniently theme Windows without patching system files or modifying other resources in the operating system, which could be overwritten by an update or a service pack.

One thing that I find with a lot of visual styles is that there are a lot of inconsistencies and oddities, I usually wind up sticking with the default theme or using Windows Classic.

The "WindowBlinds skins are clunky" argument is just about as bad as the "WindowBlinds uses tons of resources" label that several horses have tragically been beaten to death by.

I can go through so many Vista .msstyles that are nothing but recolored Aero or some other mod and compare them to the "clunky" skins. Both side have good and bad skins, but I don't think people take the time to look for WindowBlinds skins that are very nice and well designed.

To answer the original question, Vista and XP .msstyles are limited in what they can do, simple as that. WindowBlinds doesn't have those limitations and is constantly being updated with new features.

;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I used a Pixel 10 Pro XL when it first came out for about 8 months. When I first got it, it was using Google assistant and that was fast, when asking it to call somone etc. Then it automatically switched with some update to Gemini. Doing even the simplist of things like asking it to call someone in my contacts was soooooo slow compared to Google assistant. I guess it had to go out to the cloud to do that? Back on iPhone and while Siri is dumb right now, it does do those simple things, like call someone, set a timer, star the stop watch etc, really fast. That an while I like Google Material Design 3 over iOS 26, they Pixel 10 Pro XL was so slow in comparison to the iPhone 17 Pro I am using.
    • I use Gemini in my rotation of AI clients...that work pays for. It is good at most things, better than copilot for imgage searching and making images, worse at writing vs Claude and way worse at hadling technical issues when it comes to Azure stuff. I also use YT premium and maps. Anything else Google is a pass for me. I have now seen multiple people locked out of their Google accounts for reasons that are just very vauge.
    • Microsoft is building an AI datacenter that "uses less water than a fast food restaurant" by Ivan Jenic Image: Microsoft Microsoft has announced plans to build a new datacenter campus in Pecos, Texas, as the company continues to invest billions in AI infrastructure. The new facility, called project Kilby, will reportedly have a capacity of 2 gigawatts and will be one of the largest single capacity additions in the company’s history. To power the campus, Microsoft signed a 20-year deal with Chevron to supply natural gas from the Permian Basin, America's largest oil field. This deal is set to become the largest collaboration to date between a U.S. oil and gas giant and Big Tech. It’s no secret that Big Tech has often been criticized for exploiting natural resources for its AI developments. Microsoft is trying to mitigate some of that negative consensus by promising to build its own power supply for the new datacenter, independent of the public grid. The Pecos datacenter will be powered by a power plant hub, built by Chevron, with up to 2.5 gigawatts of gas-fired capacity, with potential to scale to up to 5 gigawatts. The facility will include at least seven GE Vernova turbines, with first power potentially coming online as early as late 2027 or early 2028. The power plant hub is part of an approximately $7 billion investment by Chevron, making it one of the largest dedicated energy projects tied to a single datacenter campus in the U.S. Microsoft hasn’t publicly disclosed the amount it’s investing in the new datacenter. Microsoft has also committed to implementing a closed-loop cooling system that will only require an initial water charge to operate. The company said that “the total lifecycle water use of this datacenter is only a fraction of that consumed annually by a typical fast-food restaurant.” What the press release doesn’t mention, however, is how much water the natural gas plant itself will consume, or how a 20-year fossil fuel commitment squares with the company's pledge to be carbon negative by 2030. The construction of the new datacenter should provide over 6,000 construction jobs at peak build-out, and create hundreds of operational job roles once the facility is built. Via: Reuters
    • A lot of uncertainty in this story. Might. Could. Maybe. The truth is we don't know what will happen to the universe in the end, or if it will end. Our own Milky Way galaxy will merge with the Andromeda galaxy in about 2.5 billion years, with our solar system as part of a new, larger cluster. I guess we'll have to and see how it goes down.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      195
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!