• 0

I am writing a ceaser cipher


Question

hello all I am writing ceaser cipher in java (to go along with a massive encryption tool when its all done)...

I just wanted a few opinions really...

should I include special characters? like punctuation ... if I leave puntuation out of a cipher it could be easier to decrypt ... example

hello bob, how is you're mother?

could looks like

gyrrq tqt, gqp dz uqi'wy fqmgyw?

obviously I can see that the first word is probably hello and that the second is a name or something to address someone due to the normal letter lay out if wrong I can for sure see the " ' " which would suggest "re" .... but if I remove all punctuation sentences can become hard to understand or meanings can change all together.

also should i make everything a standard lower case? this is my alphabet char array so far:

{'a', 'b', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y', 'z',

'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F', 'G', 'H', 'I', 'J', 'K', 'L', 'M', 'N', 'O', 'P', 'Q', 'R', 'S', 'T', 'U', 'V', 'W', 'X', 'Y', 'Z', '1',

'2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9', '0', '\'', '\"', ',', '@', '[', ';', '#', ']', '-', '_', '~', '{', '}', '?', '*', '?',};

is this going a bit OTT? or good to allow proper communication? i need to add more special characters and maybe remove the caps (as most people would assume the first would be a cap in a sentence which allows a small amount of elimination)

opinions? thoughts? ideas? extras?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1154212-i-am-writing-a-ceaser-cipher/
Share on other sites

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

What type of encryption tool are you going to write that uses a caesar cipher?

Ceaser ciphers are pretty weak for security, as are most rotational ciphers, so I hope its not meant to protect something valuable. ROT13 is another good one to play with, but it doesnt use punctuation, only letters of the alphabet.

If you really wanted to mess with someone, make it load the russian cyrillic alphabet as a cipher :p

  • 0

What type of encryption tool are you going to write that uses a caesar cipher?

meh just an extra layer ... its ceaser ciphers (maybe going into enigma) the ciphered text will then be encrypted using RSA with an optional AES

Ceaser ciphers are pretty weak for security, as are most rotational ciphers, so I hope its not meant to protect something valuable. ROT13 is another good one to play with, but it doesnt use punctuation, only letters of the alphabet.

If you really wanted to mess with someone, make it load the russian cyrillic alphabet as a cipher :p

ha! I like that sounds amusing ... like i said just adding it on for that little bit extra ya know :p

  • 0

"meh just an extra layer"

"will then be encrypted using RSA with an optional AES"

So in other words utterly pointless.. Like mac filtering or disabling your dhcp server as "extra security layer" on your wireless while your using WPA2.

Clearly not following KISS

  • 0

"meh just an extra layer"

"will then be encrypted using RSA with an optional AES"

So in other words utterly pointless.. Like mac filtering or disabling your dhcp server as "extra security layer" on your wireless while your using WPA2.

Clearly not following KISS

pretty much pointless yes , just for practice mostly! it wont do anything.... except annoy who ever is trying to decrypt it as well as suck up processing power lol !

  • 0

"annoy who ever is trying to decrypt it"

So you mean after they break RSA or AES -- so your talking someone with the computer power of a small country at his disposable? You mean that guy, that guy that really wants to know those launch codes SPEhosting is sending via some special code he wrote.. That guy?

I am fairly sure, nobody is going to spend 2 seconds on "cracking" your encryption - unless you put some sort of prize on it in the 1,000's of dollars, etc. Now if in the 100's of Ks or Millions you might get some serious people trying to break it. If not then sorry nobody is going to be wasting time trying to break your "practice" code.

Thats great if you want to practice, practice with something useful - so some software using using a "Caesar Cipher" based encryption makes sense. But then wrapping it inside of AES, that is not practice that is just pointless complexity that serves no purpose.

KISS!!

  • Like 3
  • 0

"annoy who ever is trying to decrypt it"

So you mean after they break RSA or AES -- so your talking someone with the computer power of a small country at his disposable? You mean that guy, that guy that really wants to know those launch codes SPEhosting is sending via some special code he wrote.. That guy?

I am fairly sure, nobody is going to spend 2 seconds on "cracking" your encryption - unless you put some sort of prize on it in the 1,000's of dollars, etc. Now if in the 100's of Ks or Millions you might get some serious people trying to break it. If not then sorry nobody is going to be wasting time trying to break your "practice" code.

Thats great if you want to practice, practice with something useful - so some software using using a "Caesar Cipher" based encryption makes sense. But then wrapping it inside of AES, that is not practice that is just pointless complexity that serves no purpose.

KISS!!

wow you are just a bundle of joy to day aint ya :p lol the RSA and AES have a very vital role in my program, its for a secure communication which will be built in to android communications (text messaging and hopefully phone calls, which may be a little harder) I have already started this app in a basic messenger style (which is easy as hell) but I want to make it so people can use their text messages and minutes rather then their data allowence. the point of RSA being included is so that people dont have to have a key they made up... because lets face it people would send the password via a plain text message and make the whole thing rather pointless...

your right the cipher is POINTLESS it has no point in this program and wont be in my final version, I just thought it would be fun way to kill a boring night (i know how sad that sounds)

  • 0

your right the cipher is POINTLESS it has no point in this program and wont be in my final version, I just thought it would be fun way to kill a boring night (i know how sad that sounds)

Writing a Ceaser cipher encrypter/decrypter is acceptable fun (a few years ago I implemented a few algorithms to do brute force decryption and things like frequentist analysis to break things like Affine ciphers).

I think its more that you worry us by writing your own encryption layer AND THEN planning to use it in an actual application. Something that should never need to be done.

  • 0

hello bob, how is you're mother?

could looks like

gyrrq tqt, gqp dz uqi'wy fqmgyw?

Are you sure you even know what a Caesar cipher is? That's not encrypted with a Caesar cipher... a Caesar cipher is a type of substitution cipher where you shift by a constant.

h->g is +1, l->r is +6, o->q is +2... they should be the same... if not, don't call it a Caesar cipher. It's a generic substitution cipher... which, admittedly, is more secure... but so incredibly insecure that it's almost as good as unencrypted. But not the point if you're just having fun :)

Anyway, to answer your question:

char c = 'a';

char c_shifted = (char)((((int)c)+2)%256)

Something along those lines... convert the character to an ASCII value, add a constant (here, 20), then compute the modulus with 256 (assuming 8 bit chars...), then convert back to a char.

  • 0

Are you sure you even know what a Caesar cipher is? That's not encrypted with a Caesar cipher... a Caesar cipher is a type of substitution cipher where you shift by a constant.

h->g is +1, l->r is +6, o->q is +2... they should be the same... if not, don't call it a Caesar cipher. It's a generic substitution cipher... which, admittedly, is more secure... but so incredibly insecure that it's almost as good as unencrypted. But not the point if you're just having fun :)

Anyway, to answer your question:

char c = 'a';

char c_shifted = (char)((((int)c)+2)%256)

Something along those lines... convert the character to an ASCII value, add a constant (here, 20), then compute the modulus with 256 (assuming 8 bit chars...), then convert back to a char.

yes i know what a ceaser cipher is i just used random letters in the example to get my explination across I couldnt be bothered to actually do one for an example

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!