-
Posts
-
By ZipZapRap · Posted
The Prime deal for the WD black is better (I got one of those) -
By ZipZapRap · Posted
Then one day, after you start your lovely new job, you turn up to work and your job has been made redundant because of AI. No job is really safe -
By olavinto · Posted
Kind of funny. But where will the profit go? To the bottomless pit of another big business where it disappears into the pockets of random money gobbling inverstors who have probably never actually worked a day in their lives, or is it used for the benefit of the workforce or donated to some worthy cause? The first option kills all entertainment value for me, and turns it into very negative marketing, the other two would I would be fine with. -
By olavinto · Posted
Which would have resulted in wealth created by reaping the benefits from those who actually worked by basically doing nothing yourself. I do not have anything against being wealthy but really do despise wealth that is generated this way, and I hate the system for makig this kind of thing possible. The money a business makes should go to the worforce and into improving their jobs, plain and simple (owners should make a decent profit, of course, but proportionally they get way too much than they deserve in comparison to the actual workers). -
By Chugworth · Posted
I think it's reasonable to say that AI will never be the same as a human, but I wouldn't go so far as to say AI would always be something less than a human. Things that differentiate it are: 1) The lack of real experiences 2) The lack of biological influences in the thought process (which is not necessarily a bad thing) 3) The extremely small context window which gets cleared with each new session If they could make an AI that uses the entire model file as re-writable memory rather than a small context window and works in real-time, I think they'd have something that you could argue is sentient or at least close to it. So often when I see AI make a mistake or perform poorly at something, I think to myself that a human could have done the same - especially a human with no experiences. At the most basic level, the brain is functioning on math also so don't think there's anything preventing AI from doing something similar. In a way, our current implementation of AI seems to be kind of like a high-level emulator, not necessarily replicating the human thought process but achieving much of the same results.
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
frj earned a badge
One Year In
-
tumultuoustangerine earned a badge
One Year In
-
goldblum earned a badge
First Post
-
IanFrosali earned a badge
One Year In
-
jahara21 earned a badge
Dedicated
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Tell a friend
Recommended Posts