Recommended Posts

Okay, I'm gonna get a new distro, but before I choose, which package of X11 should I use, XFree86 or Xorg? What are the pros and cons of each one?

There are very little technical differences.

X.org is favoured for political reasons because XFree86 changed to a GPL incompatible license when they went to XFree86 4.4

XFree86 4.3 does not have the licensing issues, it is well supported by drivers and it considered to be stable.

X.org is based on XFree86 4.4 but is also free of licensing issues. It has improved screen fonts and better alpha transparencies. You may, however, have issues when you go to add such things as video drivers.

Some distros, like those based on Debian, plan to wait for the modular edition of X.org before they port their system onto it. Their reasoning is that there is too little benefit to justify a move to X.org until then. The current release of X.org is little more than XFree86 4.4 repacked under the X.org banner (albeit with a GPL compatiblelicense).

The general consensus, however, is that XFree86 is dead (in the long term).

I should also mention that X.org 6.8 (their repackaged version of XFree86 4.4 with a few extras) was supposed to ship on Wednesday, August 25th, 2004 but it looks like their release date has slipped.

There is probably little point in upgrading to X.org 6.7 at this point although I don't really know if they are getting even close to releasing 6.8. The chart that I saw on their website (which I don't know if it is up to date) showed a lot of red boxes in the unfinished category.

I heard that some distros, like SuSE 10 are waiting for X.org to release 6.8 before they launch so they pressure is on...

x.org - it's more stable, and constantly improving (something not true for XFree86 anymore).

I think some background info might be helpful:

X.org is approved by the Open Group, an entity governing the X11 standard. XFree86 was a usable reference-implementation of the UNIX-wide X standard. But X changed the license from MIT-X11 to something GPL-incompatible before 4.4 was released. One of the main X guru's, Keith Packard, left the XFree86 team some months ago, before the license change, and started fd.o XServer, an experimental, now defunct, X11 implementation to test new features. After the license change, the last XFree86 version before the change was forked, and approved as the new, official X11 reference-implementation by the Open Group, and hosted at freedesktop.org. Keith gave up XServer and ported his improvements to X.org. A lot of the other XFree86 core developers, fed up with XFree86's license change and lack of flexibility, joined the X.org team (Egbert Eich, Alan Coopersmith, Jim Gettys, Eric Anholt...). The first X.org release was 6.7, basically XFree86 with some bugfixes - the soon to be released 6.8 contains quite a few performance and eye-candy improvements like XDamage, XFixes and Compose, and future releases might even implement parts of Looking Glass and similar features. BTW, drivers are not really an issue, even Andy Ritger of Nvidia is a regular on the X.org mailinglist... ;-)

It's been said before, but I want to add my own 2?.

X.org is going to be the future of the X11 window system. Since it is a fork of the XFree 4.3 tree, it's tried and tested and as stable as XFree 4.3 ever was (with the same driver support). The advantage of X.org is that it is and will continue to be a GPL-compatible license, and, it has a better development schedule. X.org is planning on implementing a lot of features that users have been wanting. XFree is too slow with integrating new features, patches, and upgrades. And their development is a lot more restricted in that fewer people are allowed to commit directly to the tree versus a normal OSS project. X.org has opened up a lot more and is allowing more community contribution. Which is always a Good Thing.

It's been said before, but I want to add my own 2?.

X.org is going to be the future of the X11 window system. Since it is a fork of the XFree 4.3 tree, it's tried and tested and as stable as XFree 4.3 ever was (with the same driver support). The advantage of X.org is that it is and will continue to be a GPL-compatible license, and, it has a better development schedule. X.org is planning on implementing a lot of features that users have been wanting. XFree is too slow with integrating new features, patches, and upgrades. And their development is a lot more restricted in that fewer people are allowed to commit directly to the tree versus a normal OSS project. X.org has opened up a lot more and is allowing more community contribution. Which is always a Good Thing.

Actually it was forked at XFree 4.4RC2.

ATI does not provide driver support for XFree4.4 or X.org just XFree 4.3

I think that just about eveyone believes that XFree86 is dead. The decision is whether we should wait until X.org offers something more concrete (like their modular version).

Nobody doubts the future, just the present...

Xorg was meant to replace XFree86 as the license was reently chnged.

Many distributions already have Xorg packages (Fedora installs it by default now). And Debian gives you an option which to install.

I think Xorg is fully compatible with XFree86.

Fedora installs a hybrid version of the two. Its not one nor the other.

Xorg should be your choice, most users would agree.

  • 2 weeks later...
X.org for the speed at which it is developed

x.org will be the X11 system that we all use two years from now but there are little advantages in swiching now. xFree86 is effectively dead as far as the future is concerned but in the present, it matters little.

x.org may be progressing quickly but there were late with their 6.8 release.

I recomend using xorg over xfree86 for a few reasons. First off is that while they did miss their release date by almost 2 weeks, how many groups truly reach their release goals? I'd personally rather have a stable and solid 6.8 release than worry about a buggy 6.8 that crashes on me. Also xorg is on a cycle where they plan on making 2-3 eleases every year vs the beyond slow release schedule that the xfree86 team had. Next I feel that the xfree86 group's license change was not called for and it was done because there were rumors that x was going to be forked so they changed it simply to "protect" their code so to say. Finally xorg is working on actually making x11 a modern day xserver and not so ancient. whats really going to be nice is the direction that xorg is headed. When they add opengl acceleration its going to take x to whole new levels and the modular x will also make it easier patch, update and maintain x.

To make it short xorg has newer features, is being backed by most vendors and is gpl compliant.

  • 3 weeks later...

GPL-compliant doesn't necessarily mean that it is licenesed under the GPL.

The reason that many of us think it is important is that a change in licensing terms can allow software to be propriatary and closed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Euro-Office must default to ODF to be considered "genuinely European", LibreOffice argues by David Uzondu Euro-Office is a web-based collaborative office suite that positions itself as a "European sovereign alternative" to American tech companies, backed by a coalition of developers including Nextcloud, IONOS, Abilian, BTactic, OpenProject, and, more recently, Tuta. The project officially went live a couple of days ago, but not before drawing heavy fire from LibreOffice developers, who called the marketing claim that Euro-Office represents the "first open-source office suite developed in Europe" a deceptive historical inaccuracy because projects like OpenOffice and LibreOffice existed decades earlier. Now that the project has launched, LibreOffice is back with another complaint, arguing that Euro-Office cannot consider itself "genuinely European" while it pushes proprietary Microsoft defaults on users. Euro-Office had promised to improve the OpenDocument Format (ODF) back in April, but the current release still plagues users with several technical failures. For instance, the suite lacks an admin setting to enforce ODF, and mobile editors completely block ODF saves, forcing files into Microsoft's OOXML formats. Some configurations force files into read-only mode, while editing frequently corrupts document formatting or erases data. LibreOffice thinks that merely supporting a format as an afterthought does not make you a sovereign alternative, as file formats are the battleground where" digital sovereignty is won or lost." The road to the first stable release of Euro-Office has been quite bumpy due to an aggressive public fallout with OnlyOffice, from which the coalition originally forked the project. OnlyOffice struck back by accusing the coalition of violating copyright terms under its AGPLv3 branding requirements by stripping the original branding anyway and forking the code. Getting Euro-Office up and running is a bit wonky (at least for non-technical users), as there is no direct installer to grab off the web. The easiest way we learnt is by using Docker. First, pull the official Euro-Office image from the GitHub Container Registry: docker pull ghcr.io/euro-office/documentserver:latest Then, run the container with active ports and a secure JWT token, enabling the test environment: docker run -i -t -d -p 8080:80 --restart=always -e EXAMPLE_ENABLED=true -e JWT_SECRET=my_secure_jwt_secret ghcr.io/euro-office/documentserver:latest And finally, open a web browser and go to the following address: http://localhost:8080 If you are running this on a remote server, replace localhost with your server's IP address. You will see the Euro-Office test page, where you can create new text documents, spreadsheets, or presentations directly in the browser. Image via Euro-Office Nextcloud promises that proper standalone desktop versions and mobile apps will arrive in a future release.
    • It’s any of their products not just windows.
    • Google Gemini has been failing for users across the United States, Europe, and Asia since early Wednesday morning, June 10, 2026, and more than six hours into the incident Google has yet to declare a fix............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318152/20260610/google-gemini-outage-tops-six-hours-errors-1076-1099-worldwideflash-lite-still-answers.htm
    • Fun fact: There are more Warhammer 40k games than there are stars in the universe.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      197
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!