Free antivirus for server 2003


Recommended Posts

AVG does not work on server 2003 :no:

i tried installing it on my server 2003 and it came up with a message saying that it cannot be installed and detected it was a commercial file server or something

lol

585119004[/snapback]

The reason is that the AVG license specifically tells you that you cannot install on any kind of server. Read the EULA next time, please.

How did you managed to get it installed?

585151796[/snapback]

:angry: hehhe ;] :D I been on windows 2000 pro and xp for the past months, but when i did use win2k3 as a desktop it worked fine. I just decided to hit back up win2k3 as a desktop lastnight.... so i re-installed and it works fine. Thats the free version i had on my computer for some time now (months), so im not sure if the newest free version doesnt work, but this one works fine., :rofl:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/tw1sta/samething.jpg

right after i did that update it told me they are making a new avg and mine will be unsupport in couple weeks, so im going to upgrade to the newest free avg.. itll prob. kill my os ;( o well lol

Edited by Tw1sta

ur best bet for a free trial is f-prot if u want it they charge like 30$ for a version that works on ALL windows versions :D

i use it and as lons as i keep it updated i NEVER get viri unlike with other "top name" antiviri programs f-prot has NEVER failed me in the mannnnnnnny years i have used it (since the dos versions) :D

  • 2 weeks later...

Computer Associates eTrust

http://download.microsoft.com/download/d/6...AV-Standard.exe

Give this a try. Direct from MS. Is part of XP Partner Pack. MS are giving 1 years free updates and support on this, if you download and register it all.

This works perfectly on W2k3 systems

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      213
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!