building a server...needs a os

By BigPaul2006
in Linux

 Share

Recommended Posts

Veteran

BigPaul2006

Posted
Posted

i have an old 133 mhz pentium, 32 megs of memory or more, i cant really remember right now, pc laying around that i would like to turn into a testing server. i would like to be able to host a small webpage from it (apache). this will all be primarily for learning purposes. i would like the os to include a gui that didnt take up alot of system resources but command line could also work (if the os comes with some good documentation) which os do you guys and girls recommend?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/263522-building-a-serverneeds-a-os/
Share on other sites
Proficient

MegaManXcalibur

Posted
Posted

I would say to take a look at Slackware (yeah my usual recommendation but bear with me)...

http://www.slackware.org

It's a really good distrabution for running on older hardware. Everything in Slackware can easily be done via the command line (and there is a lot of Linux command line documentation out there, much of it is very good). The distro is focused on stability, simplicity, and security (I know I say this whenever I talk about Slackware... sue me).

It lives up to all of those. The software that ships with Slackware is, for the most part, very stable. All the tools are command line based so you don't actually need a GUI (resource intensive, bad for older hardware for the most part) to do things. Also security updates are out as soon as humanly possible.

Grand Master

Fred Derf Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
i have an old 133 mhz pentium, 32 megs of memory or more, i cant really remember right now,  pc laying around that i would like to turn into a testing server. i would like to be able to host a small webpage from it (apache). this will all be primarily for learning purposes. i would like the os to include a gui that didnt take up alot of system resources but command line could also work (if the os comes with some good documentation) which os do you guys and girls recommend?

585185482[/snapback]

With 133MHz and 32MB of RAM then you'd better believe it's going to be command line. :D

Most distros should work. You'll just need to keep it basic.

Veteran

Mike Douglas

Posted
Posted
well, you could try Gentoo, and only compile the things you need... e.g. apache (though, it would take a long time to compile stuff on a 133)

585185835[/snapback]

I would have to go against this advice, why waste all that time compiling to the same architecure many other distros already provide?

Mentor

ThunderRiver

Posted
Posted

I would go against Gentoo as the compiling will take forever to finish.

If you are into Open Source, you should try an older version of Slackware (version 7.x) because it provides much better hardware support. Newer kernel doesn't seem to support as many old hardwares as it should.

If I were you, I would bust out Windows NT 4 with all the latest service pack (SP6...) and patches. Honestly, NT4 GUI should not take up too much resources.

Grand Master

markwolfe Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Another recommendation for "not Gentoo", unless you do the version that you don't have to compile.

Any current distro would work great, and I would also not recommend WinNT4 (obsolete and you would have to pay to have it properly licensed).

As for a GUI, don't put a GUI on your box, but install something like webmin, which will allow you to have a web GUI access to the server from another box on your network running a browser. Very little server resources taken up with that! :yes:

Mentor

randy_tho

Posted
Posted
You could try something like DamnSmall Linux.  Its Debian based so adding what ever server software you need should be pretty easy.

585187933[/snapback]

I jsut setup FreeBSD on a similar machine for the same purpose. I am planning on using it for a moblog type server eventually.

But I'm thinking about switching over to DSL because it appears to be very easy to get where I want. There is a tutorial on this board on setting it up. Seems pretty short. Right now I have everything running on BSD but PHP doesn't seem to work. It won't render pages. Likely something I have failed to do as I'm a newb at unix.

Edit: BTW, you can use Putty to SSH in to the linux/unix box and do everything. You don't even need anything hooked to the computer. No monitor / keyboard / mouse.

Mentor

Vlad

Posted
Posted
because the compiled code should run faster because it will be optimised for his system

585187530[/snapback]

All distributions compile for the i386. Some compile for i586 (mandrake and others). Original Pentiums don't contain additional instruction sets, merely faster clockspeeds and a FPU. Compiling Gentoo for this architecture would be a lesson in futility, as well as patience.

Save yourself a huge ass headache and grab a *BSD or tinyish Linux distribution, such as Slackware, Damn Small Linux, or possibly Debian.

Proficient

Maxious

Posted
Posted
I think 2003 would be a little slow on a Pentium 133 with 32 MB of RAM.

585188388[/snapback]

it actually refuses to install on a 133mhz

one vote for slackware - its been built up from the days of floppy disk installs and 8.1 seemed to run fine on a 100mhz processor.

definately NOT gentoo - that took about 3 days of compiling on my 1.1ghz :p

Proficient

vhane

Posted
Posted
well, you could try Gentoo, and only compile the things you need... e.g. apache (though, it would take a long time to compile stuff on a 133)

585185835[/snapback]

I would advise against a source-based distro. It would take weeks to compile everything, for little gain ultimately.

Grand Master

markwolfe Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
I think 2003 would be a little slow on a Pentium 133 with 32 MB of RAM.

585188388[/snapback]

it actually refuses to install on a 133mhz

585188411[/snapback]

According to Microsoft's site: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003...qs/default.mspx

it looks like Windows Server 2003 will just make the cut, as far as CPU speed is concerned. However that 32MB of RAM isn't even close to the 128MB minimum listed.

You might be able to just follow the HOWTO here that another Neowin member wrote up along the lines of setting up a Linux server quickly: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=258829

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By AndrewSteel · Posted

      So what is it, "Some exciting upgrades happened under the hood, and one of those upgrades is now available to all Windows 11 users." or "Also, you may need to enable it manually, as new features are rolling out gradually. Here is how to do it:" We keep hearing these are rolling out but they never seem to show up, we have force them on with ViVetool. Getting a bit tired of it.
    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By JoeyC203 · Posted

      Seems very lazy, so basically drain more battery power on laptops/tablets if this is turned on.
    • Edifier's popular R1280Ts bookshelf speaker can be a nice upgrade for your PC desktop audio

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Edifier's popular R1280Ts bookshelf speaker can be a nice upgrade for your PC desktop audio by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered a very nice discount on Sony's high-resolution SS-CS5M2 speakers, which are currently on sale for just $178. It packs the rather rare super tweeter that offers an additional level of clarity and "airy"-ness which a tweeter cannot provide. It's a passive speaker though which means it will require external amplification, which will cost extra. Let's say though that you have a budget of under $150 but still want a decent-sounding speaker that's active. The Edifier 1280Ts can help in this regard, as the unit is currently at a decent price of $130 (purchase link under the specs table down below). While you will not get deep sub-bass from the 1280Ts, you should get clearer vocals and highs like cymbals than a cheaper satellite-based 2.1 system. Obviously the soundstage and imaging will also improve due to the better reproduction of highs. As mentioned above, the Edifier R1280Ts is active and so does not need a separate amplifier, as it's a powered system with its own amplification. A great thing about this model is that you can add a separate active subwoofer to it too using the "sub out" option, which essentially acts like an LFE. This way, you can add in the missing deep bass. The technical specifications of the Edifier R1280Ts are given in the table below: Specification Value Total Output Power 42W RMS (21W + 21W) Driver Units 4-inch mid-range/bass driver + 0.5-inch silk diaphragm treble driver Frequency Response 52Hz – 20kHz Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) ≥85dBA Input Sensitivity Line In1: R/L: 500±50mV Line In2: R/L: 700±50mV Inputs Dual RCA inputs Outputs Sub Out port for external subwoofer Get it at the link below: Edifier R1280Ts Powered Bookshelf Speakers - 2.0 Stereo Active Near Field Monitors with Subwoofer Line Out: $129.99 (Sold by Edifier Online Store, Shipped by Amazon US) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By pookie62 · Posted

      Appreciate the focus on UI performance, but this is going the wrong way. Instead of optimizing performance, coding to lower latency, etc. this is just throwing horsepower. This is lazy.
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +primortal · Posted

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      489
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      197
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!