Reinstalling boot loader


Recommended Posts

Hey all.

At the moment I'm trying to get into Fedora Core 3 after a Windows XP format. Before I reformatted I could access it fine, but now Windows has overridden grub.

Now, I've tried installing the boot loader again by putting the FC3 CD 1 in and then going through the options. However, at the end it says something about there not being any kernel updates so it can't install it.

Is there any way to get it back? The only way I know is to reinstall Fedora which I don't really want to do unless necessary.

Thanks in advance,

-folio

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/267155-reinstalling-boot-loader/
Share on other sites

The procedure to do a rescue mode and chroot and do a grub-install should work.

What procedure did you follow, and did you get any errors?

However, if the procedure just isn't working, you will probably be able to put in the CDs and do an "upgrade" from FC3 to FC3, and that may re-write your GRUB. :unsure:

I did try the upgrade method, but it came up with the kernel error message. I went through the first few screens as I would in installation mode (graphic), then chose to upgrade my installation and used the default 'new' grub settings.

I'll try what you suggested although it may need explaining. I'll give it a go first. :)

Thanks,

-folio

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!