can mac mini fun tiger smoothly?


Recommended Posts

plenty enough. and it will fun it greatly too

585276371[/snapback]

:rofl: You noticed it too :laugh:

Anyway, I would hope so. It's pretty much my only chance at getting a Mac, which I REALLY want, so if it didn't, I would be highly disappointed.

corrent me if I am wrong, but isn't Tiger suppost to run faster then panther?

585277974[/snapback]

so far, apple has done a great job getting new versions of os x to work even better on older equipment, and i'm sure tiger will be no different. i am sure the mac mini will be no slouch.

Yea, my 12" PowerBook 1.33GHz with a GeForce FX 5200 Go runs it amazingly well. You won't get the really fancy effects of Core Image (because the Radeon 9200 doesn't support a few features Core Image needs) but you will get some of the nice OS X eyecandy.

While we are on the tiger running smoothly subject i just have to ask this myself. A G3 700 with 386 ram will run tiger well right? and if I want to put more memory into my laptop, (ibook) will it be as easy as a pc?

585285553[/snapback]

1. It'll run pretty well. Apple has a knack for making its software actually run better from release to release.

2. Putting memory in an iBook is pretty darn easy. Lift up the keyboard, take out the Airport Card, unscrew the protection plate, and the memory chip is right there. Arguably not as easy as taking the siding off of a PC (unless you have a horrible case), but very easy for a laptop.

I'm pretty much lost here for OS version for Macs - what are the main differences between Tiger and what the MiniMac is preloaded with? :/  <---- noob.

585285793[/snapback]

Mac mini comes with Panther (10.3) http://www.apple.com/macosx/

Tiger is 10.4 http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger

Have a look at the features. Basically, Tiger is everything in Panther, and then some...

You'll want Tiger, no question.

Elite_graphix - i think it has just one memory slot, which would contain the 256Mb stick. So you'd have to swap it out for an upgrade. I heard Apple might well support a 2Gb stick in there, soon. I believe it'd work, but Apple hasn't certified it for use in the machine yet.

Okies, hopefully I'll have the money for one of these pretty soon, but I doubt that I would be able to restrain myself from pre-ordering one even tho I havent read anything apart from the blatantly biased stuff over at Apple.com.

Specifically Id be interested in noise made by the system as well as how well it actually performs in 'real life' and not just in an Apple lab.

That little bitty box cant make too much noise at all. Id imagine its got a fan or 2 like the ones in the G5 iMacs. They've hit a point where the G4 chips just dont need nearly as much cooling as the used to. So one little fan and normal drive noise.

If you want any idea of how it would perform, I'd walk myself down to the nearest apple store and play around with it. But it'll be nice and fast for day-to-day work, you can count on that.

As for anyone else with the "will Tiger run on such and such" question, OSX scales very well. As long as you can handle less of the eye-candy, OS X is gonna run decentlyl on anything Apple recommends it will (anything post-beige G3).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!