Which Music Player has the best quality?


Recommended Posts

CD has the best quality, but if you encode your Mp3s yourself, you can encode them at CD quality. Minidiscs uses a custom compression format that isn't very good.

For players, I have heard that the iRiver mp3 players have superb sound, but iPods are the most popular. I've also heard great things about the Creative Zen Micro. Do some research by googling them to see which one you would like.

I love my MP3 CD Player, it never skips either, its a Panasonic and has anti-skip on it. Bateery life is good too and I know this isn't as much as a Hard Drive based player but it stores usually 120 mp3's ;)

oh so the db's tell how good the sound is?  the higher the better?

585282712[/snapback]

It's a large part of the picture. The higher the sound to noise ratio, the less "impurities" you'll get that are due to the hardware putting out the sound.

Yeahhh in terms of dB, Creative takes the cake... most of their products are at 98dB... iRiver is apparently 80dB, though it sure as hell sounds a lot better than that. And iPod is said to be in the 70s.

585283178[/snapback]

iriver is 90 and ipod is 86 or 89, I believe.

The difference in Signal to Noise ratio isn't great enough between any of the MP3 players to make a noticable difference when using cheap headphones.

Buy a pair of Sony MDR-EX71LP for $35 (link) to complement which ever MP3 player you purchase, and you will hear a noticable improvement in audio quality.

If you have the money, get the Shure E2c setup instead for $65 (link)

Edited by digistil

You can't just use signal to noise ratio measure the sound quality of DAPs. It is a part of it, but there are still many other factors to consider.

Also, you might like the way a player sounds, even though others hate it. From my own experience, Creative (Zen Touch) is the most "fun", the iRiver (H120, H320) is up there, but still lags behind the Creative, while the iPod is just... flat. My advice is, try out different players before you choose one. What sounds good to others might not sound good to you (except the iPod, it sounds worse than my two year old P.O.S. Samsung DAP, so avoid it if audio quality is top priority).

If you encode at 192kbit, it's almost the same as CD quality, and with some players, you have the option to encode to lossless formats as well.

Like digistil mentioned, if you quality is important to you, buy a good earbud/headphone (Sony EX71, Sharp MD33) as well. Stock earbuds sound like crap, no matter if it's used on a Zen or iPod.

I read the Creative has reported S to N ratio of 96!

I also read the iRiver H1xx/H3xx (and presumably the new H10) is around 92, followed by the undisclosed figure of the iPod, expected to be in the 80s.

I can notice a difference between the iRiver and iPod, and both of them versus the low-end Aiwa HDD players.

I'd also have to agree that quality headphone are a big part of it.

Sony's newest in-ear buds supposedly have very high quality and put out really good bass. Using them with any mp3 player will help.

But yeah, as far as SNR goes, Creative > iRiver > iPod

Not necessarily. Listen to me, try it before you buy it!!!

Just because a bunch of people on Neowin tells you it sounds good doesn't mean that you'll like the way it sounds.

From what I've seen, most people love the sound quality of Creative's DAPs. Take it for what it's worth.

I have a little different opinion about this topic. I have people ask me all the time about it because they know I love technology. I like having a pda (I have a hp ipaq 1945 with a 1gb sd card) because I can not only hold tons of music, but I also get all the other functionality that comes with having a computer with me all the time. I can carry tons of pictures, even videos with me. So, I know its not what you asked, but I just like it better having a computer with me always to play my mp3's and everything else. What do yall think?

I have a Creative Nomad Jukebox 3 and the sound quality is awsome on it (though it doesnt go too loud, which im sure is not the case with neweer products from creative now) but I havent not yet compared the sound directly between the jukebox and my new iriver... I can easily say though, iriver is a lot louder.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I don't find them "bitchy" or "whiny". I think the term you should use it, uhm, "passionate."
    • Ahh, I didn't know that. It makes sense. I was thinking I would be fine with 50 hours, but 100 is close enough that I wouldn't feel like I am paying for more than I am using. I might check it out sometime.
    • Google's next-gen Tensor AI chips might be produced by Samsung, report says by Hamid Ganji Image via Google Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is produced in collaboration with companies such as Broadcom and TSMC, but a recent report suggests that the search giant is in talks with Samsung to hand over part of the production to the Korean tech company. According to a report by The Information, citing people familiar with the matter, Google has begun talks with Samsung about using its chip manufacturing capacity for the next generation of Tensor AI chips. Google’s upcoming TPUs are reportedly codenamed “Icefish” and will be produced using Samsung's 2-nanometer process technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is expected to produce only a portion of the next-generation Tensor chips, with most of the production remaining at TSMC. The Information says the new Tensor chips are currently in the design stage and are scheduled to enter mass production in 2028. TSMC is generally considered one of the most reliable chip manufacturing partners and is trusted by tech giants such as Apple and Google. However, the growing demand for TSMC’s AI chips, combined with the company’s focus on meeting demand from AI data centers, has reportedly prompted Google to seek additional manufacturing partners for its next-generation TPUs. Besides Samsung and TSMC, Intel could also be assigned part of the production. The Information reported this week is that Google has begun talks with Intel to produce up to three million TPUs in 2028. However, this is not the first time Google has partnered with Samsung on chip production, as Samsung has previously manufactured Tensor chips for Pixel smartphones. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit is used in cloud data centers and competes with NVIDIA’s chips, which currently dominate the market. By relying on in-house chips, Google can not only reduce its dependence on third-party providers but also create new revenue opportunities. The company has already supplied its TPUs to the AI firm Anthropic.
    • Reminder that the Premium and Ultimate plans already come with a 100 hour per month limit, which you then have to pay more to increase in 15 hour blocks.
    • It does invite Linux because MS should have been improving their products all along these years instead chose to ignore the users now this year they’re making all of these improvements to their products where as Linux doesn’t have this kind of problems in fact it has gotten so good I can even play Windows games in Steam that I no longer ever needed Windows to carry on with my life, unlike you still use Windows and chose to try beat down down those who don't use Windows because they love their LG TV. (Surprisingly I actually own a 55” LED LG TV and it has been going strong for almost 14 years, longer than any Sony TV”)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!